Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 115192
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115192
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115192
Table 1 Comparative analysis of general data, mean ± SD
| Observation group (n = 86) | Control group (n = 50) | χ2/t value | P value | |
| Sex | 0.022 | 0.882 | ||
| Male | 35 | 21 | ||
| Female | 51 | 29 | ||
| Age (years) | 30.77 ± 5.14 | 31.06 ± 4.96 | 0.324 | 0.746 |
| Years of education | 11.19 ± 2.32 | 10.88 ± 2.09 | 0.769 | 0.443 |
Table 2 Comparative Hamilton Depression Rating Scale assessment, mean ± SD
| Observation group (n = 86) | Control group (n = 50) | t value | P value | |
| Depression | 3.77 ± 0.50 | 1.66 ± 0.66 | 21.04 | < 0.0001 |
| Anxiety | 3.81 ± 0.39 | 1.82 ± 0.72 | 20.92 | < 0.0001 |
| Sleep disorders | 3.44 ± 0.57 | 1.56 ± 0.58 | 18.43 | < 0.0001 |
| Loss of appetite | 3.64 ± 0.51 | 1.74 ± 0.49 | 21.25 | < 0.0001 |
| Guilt | 3.55 ± 0.55 | 1.20 ± 0.95 | 18.29 | < 0.0001 |
| Suicidal thoughts | 3.47 ± 0.52 | 0.81 ± 0.58 | 27.56 | < 0.0001 |
| Physical symptoms | 3.69 ± 0.27 | 1.08 ± 0.44 | 42.90 | < 0.0001 |
| Global | 25.36 ± 0.65 | 9.90 ± 1.54 | 81.59 | < 0.0001 |
Table 3 Intergroup differences on neuropsychological assessments, mean ± SD
| Observation group (n = 86) | Control group (n = 50) | t value | P value | |
| MoCA | 19.22 ± 1.88 | 28.30 ± 0.68 | 32.88 | < 0.0001 |
| TMT-A (second) | 69.51 ± 17.23 | 53.36 ± 14.64 | 5.561 | < 0.0001 |
| TMT-B (second) | 106.97 ± 33.27 | 87.90 ± 6.28 | 10.31 | < 0.0001 |
| DSST | 57.56 ± 10.07 | 44.16 ± 8.19 | 7.993 | < 0.0001 |
Table 4 Comparative analysis of fractional anisotropy across brain regions, mean ± SD
| Groups | Left superior frontal gyrus | Right superior frontal gyrus | Left middle frontal gyrus | Right middle frontal gyrus | Left inferior frontal gyrus | Right inferior frontal gyrus |
| Observation group (n = 86) | 0.48 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.08 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.10 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.06 |
| Control group (n = 50) | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.05 |
| t value | 1.320 | 0.364 | 2.088 | 1.166 | 0.767 | 1.989 |
| P value | 0.189 | 0.716 | 0.039 | 0.246 | 0.444 | 0.049 |
| Groups | Left temporal lobe | Right temporal lobe | Left occipital lobe | Right occipital lobe | Genu of the corpus callosum | Splenium of the corpus callosum |
| Observation group (n = 86) | 0.40 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.80 ± 0.09 | 0.80 ± 0.05 |
| Control group (n = 50) | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 0.79 ± 0.04 |
| t value | 6.299 | 9.316 | 1.773 | 1.367 | 0.625 | 1.207 |
| P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.078 | 0.174 | 0.533 | 0.230 |
Table 5 Inter-group comparison of mean kurtosis values across brain regions, mean ± SD
| Groups | Left superior frontal gyrus | Right superior frontal gyrus | Left middle frontal gyrus | Right middle frontal gyrus | Left inferior frontal gyrus | Right inferior frontal gyrus |
| Observation group (n = 86) | 0.83 ± 0.14 | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 0.92 ± 0.10 | 0.92 ± 0.11 | 0.98 ± 0.14 | 0.93 ± 0.09 |
| Control group (n = 50) | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.07 |
| t value | 5.438 | 6.995 | 0.623 | 1.686 | 0.472 | 0.676 |
| P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.534 | 0.094 | 0.638 | 0.501 |
| Groups | Left temporal lobe | Right temporal lobe | Left occipital lobe | Right occipital lobe | Genu of the corpus callosum | Splenium of the corpus callosum |
| Observation group (n = 86) | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 1.00 ± 0.78 | 1.32 ± 0.15 |
| Control group (n = 50) | 1.03 ± 0.05 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 1.03 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.13 ± 0.49 | 1.27 ± 0.21 |
| t value | 14.08 | 4.601 | 1.595 | 1.874 | 1.062 | 1.613 |
| P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.113 | 0.063 | 0.290 | 0.109 |
Table 6 Intergroup differences in mean diffusivity across brain regions, mean ± SD
| Groups | Left superior frontal gyrus | Right superior frontal gyrus | Left middle frontal gyrus | Right middle frontal gyrus | Left inferior frontal gyrus | Right inferior frontal gyrus |
| Observation group (n = 86) | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.11 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.07 | 0.92 ± 0.07 |
| Control group (n = 50) | 0.86 ± 0.10 | 0.84 ± 0.14 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.08 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.05 |
| t value | 1.553 | 1.385 | 0.937 | 1.795 | 0.845 | 1.773 |
| P value | 0.123 | 0.168 | 0.350 | 0.075 | 0.399 | 0.078 |
| Groups | Left temporal lobe | Right temporal lobe | Left occipital lobe | Right occipital lobe | Genu of the corpus callosum | Splenium of the corpus callosum |
| Observation group (n = 86) | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 0.08 | 0.94 ± 0.08 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 1.03 ± 0.12 | 0.94 ± 0.05 |
| Control group (n = 50) | 1.01 ± 0.10 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 0.92 ± 0.07 | 0.99 ± 0.19 | 0.93 ± 0.10 |
| t value | 0.600 | 0.671 | 0.703 | 1.935 | 1.505 | 0.777 |
| P value | 0.550 | 0.503 | 0.483 | 0.055 | 0.135 | 0.439 |
Table 7 Correlations of regional fractional anisotropy and mean kurtosis with cognitive metrics
| MoCA | TMT-A | TMT-B | DSST | |||||
| r value | P value | r value | P value | r value | P value | r value | P value | |
| FA value | ||||||||
| Left temporal lobe | -0.002 | 0.984 | 0.098 | 0.391 | 0.013 | 0.905 | 0.069 | 0.523 |
| Right temporal lobe | 0.095 | 0.384 | -0.117 | 0.283 | 0.049 | 0.652 | 0.100 | 0.358 |
| MK value | ||||||||
| Left superior frontal gyrus | 0.331 | 0.002 | 0.033 | 0.760 | 0.018 | 0.866 | -0.265 | 0.014 |
| Right superior frontal gyrus | 0.422 | < 0.0001 | -0.117 | 0.284 | -0.140 | 0.197 | 0.081 | 0.459 |
| Left temporal lobe | -0.092 | 0.401 | -0.089 | 0.413 | -0.111 | 0.307 | 0.076 | 0.486 |
| Right temporal lobe | 0.048 | 0.657 | 0.096 | 0.378 | 0.073 | 0.504 | -0.172 | 0.114 |
- Citation: Liu L, Tang S, Chen MZ, Nie X, Li J, Yao L, Zeng BG, Zhou JB, Zhou FQ. Monitoring white matter volume alterations via cranial magnetic resonance imaging in major depressive disorder: Association with cognitive dysfunction. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(4): 115192
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i4/115192.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115192
