BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 121996
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.121996
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants by assisted reproductive technology outcome (pregnant vs non-pregnant), n (%)/mean ± SD
Variable
Pregnant (n = 51)
Non-pregnant (n = 49)
All (n = 100)
P value
Demographic characteristics
Age (years)33.8 ± 4.135.3 ± 4.634.5 ± 4.40.079
BMI (kg/m²)23.3 ± 2.623.9 ± 3.123.6 ± 2.90.290
Years of education13.8 ± 2.413.2 ± 2.713.5 ± 2.60.248
Employed38 (74.5)34 (69.4)72 (72.0)0.556
Infertility characteristics
Infertility duration (years)2.8 ± 1.53.7 ± 2.03.2 ± 1.80.012
Type: Primary18 (35.3)22 (44.9)40 (40.0)0.317
Prior ART attempts, mean1.4 ± 0.91.9 ± 1.11.6 ± 1.00.017
CSD characteristics
CSD diameter (mm)8.1 ± 2.09.0 ± 2.58.5 ± 2.30.046
Residual myometrium (mm)3.6 ± 1.02.8 ± 1.13.2 ± 1.1< 0.001
CSD severity-mild26 (51.0)9 (18.4)35 (35.0)< 0.001
CSD severity-moderate19 (37.3)18 (36.7)37 (37.0)0.954
CSD severity-severe6 (11.8)22 (44.9)28 (28.0)< 0.001
Baseline psychological scores
SAS score54.2 ± 9.662.7 ± 10.358.3 ± 10.5< 0.001
SDS score52.1 ± 9.161.4 ± 10.056.6 ± 10.2< 0.001
FertiQoL score56.8 ± 8.447.9 ± 8.852.5 ± 9.3< 0.001
Spousal support score78.4 ± 9.268.3 ± 11.473.5 ± 11.2< 0.001
ART laboratory parameters
AFC11.4 ± 3.810.8 ± 4.111.1 ± 3.90.434
AMH (ng/mL)2.8 ± 1.42.5 ± 1.62.7 ± 1.50.321
Oocytes retrieved (n)12.1 ± 3.211.4 ± 3.711.8 ± 3.40.297
High-quality embryos (n)5.6 ± 1.95.0 ± 2.25.3 ± 2.10.145
Table 2 Prevalence and severity distribution of anxiety and depression by assisted reproductive technology outcome, n (%)
Category
All (n = 100)
Pregnant (n = 51)
Non-pregnant (n = 49)
P value
SAS
    Normal (< 50)26 (26.0)19 (37.3)7 (14.3)0.008
    Mild anxiety (50-59)32 (32.0)20 (39.2)12 (24.5)0.107
    Moderate anxiety (60-69)28 (28.0)10 (19.6)18 (36.7)0.054
    Severe anxiety (≥ 70)14 (14.0)2 (3.9)12 (24.5)0.003
    Any anxiety (≥ 50)74 (74.0)32 (62.7)42 (85.7)0.007
SDS
    Normal (< 53)32 (32.0)24 (47.1)8 (16.3)0.001
    Mild depression (53-62)35 (35.0)19 (37.3)16 (32.7)0.624
    Moderate depression (63-72)24 (24.0)7 (13.7)17 (34.7)0.012
    Severe depression (≥ 73)9 (9.0)1 (2.0)8 (16.3)0.013
    Any depression (≥ 53)68 (68.0)27 (52.9)41 (83.7)< 0.001
Co-morbid anxiety + depression
Both SAS ≥ 50 and SDS ≥ 5356 (56.0)19 (37.3)37 (75.5)< 0.001
Table 3 Assisted reproductive technology outcomes stratified by cesarean scar defect severity
CSD severity
n
Clinical pregnancy rate (%)
Live birth rate (%)
Miscarriage rate (%)
P value1
Mild (RMT ≥ 3.5 mm)3526/35 (74.3)22/35 (62.9)4/26 (15.4)Ref
Moderate (RMT 2.5-3.4 mm)3720/37 (54.1)15/37 (40.5)5/20 (25.0)0.046
Severe (RMT < 2.5 mm)285/28 (17.9)3/28 (10.7)2/5 (40.0)< 0.001
Overall10051/100 (51.0)40/100 (40.0)11/51 (21.6)-
Table 4 Univariate logistic regression analysis of candidate prognostic factors for clinical pregnancy
Variable
β
OR (95%CI)
SE
Wald (df = 1)
P value
Psychological variables
SAS score (per 1 point)-0.0670.935 (0.904-0.967)0.01617.24< 0.001
SDS score (per 1 point)-0.0710.932 (0.901-0.963)0.01619.89< 0.001
FertiQoL score (per 1 point)0.0831.087 (1.047-1.128)0.02017.61< 0.001
Spousal support score0.0721.075 (1.037-1.114)0.01914.23< 0.001
Co-morbid anxiety & depression-1.6010.202 (0.088-0.462)0.42114.47< 0.001
CSD characteristics
Residual myometrium (mm)0.6211.861 (1.382-2.506)0.15216.73< 0.001
CSD diameter (mm)-0.1580.854 (0.744-0.980)0.0705.090.024
CSD severity: Mild vs severe2.41711.21 (3.72-33.79)0.56518.27< 0.001
Infertility & ART variables
Infertility duration (years)-0.2250.799 (0.665-0.959)0.0945.740.017
Prior ART attempts (n)-0.3780.685 (0.494-0.949)0.1675.120.024
High-quality embryos (n)0.1891.208 (1.017-1.435)0.0884.620.032
Demographic variables
Age (years)-0.0710.932 (0.858-1.012)0.0422.860.091
BMI (kg/m²)-0.0390.962 (0.871-1.062)0.0500.600.438
Nursing intervention (comprehensive vs none)1.0052.732 (1.188-6.282)0.4275.540.019
Table 5 Multivariate binary logistic regression: Independent prognostic factors for clinical pregnancy
Variable
β
aOR (95%CI)
SE
Wald (df = 1)
P value
Model AUC = 0.821 (95%CI: 0.744-0.899); Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.612
SAS score (per 1 point)-0.0520.949 (0.913-0.987)0.0206.760.009
FertiQoL score (per 1 point)0.0581.060 (1.016-1.106)0.0227.000.008
Residual myometrium (mm)0.4881.629 (1.192-2.225)0.1609.300.002
CSD severity: Mild vs severe1.6425.167 (1.628-16.40)0.5897.770.005
Co-morbid anxiety & depression-1.1830.306 (0.106-0.886)0.5414.780.029
Spousal support score0.0431.044 (1.003-1.086)0.0214.200.040
Table 6 Subgroup analysis: Psychological scores and assisted reproductive technology outcomes stratified by cesarean scar defect severity and pregnancy outcome, mean ± SD
Subgroup
SAS
SDS
FertiQoL
Pregnancy rate (%)
P (SAS/SDS)
Mild CSD (RMT ≥ 3.5 mm, n = 35)
Pregnant (n = 26)52.8 ± 9.050.4 ± 8.658.9 ± 7.974.3-
Non-pregnant (n = 9)61.2 ± 9.859.1 ± 9.249.6 ± 8.425.70.028
Moderate CSD (RMT 2.5-3.4 mm, n = 37)
Pregnant (n = 20)55.3 ± 9.852.8 ± 9.356.4 ± 8.854.1-
Non-pregnant (n = 17)64.1 ± 10.462.3 ± 10.146.8 ± 9.145.90.009
Severe CSD (RMT < 2.5 mm, n = 28)
Pregnant (n = 5)58.0 ± 11.255.6 ± 10.453.2 ± 9.017.9-
Non-pregnant (n = 23)65.4 ± 10.865.0 ± 9.844.2 ± 9.682.10.018
P value (across CSD severity groups, non-pregnant only)
Between-group (non-pregnant)0.0480.0390.044-One-way ANOVA


Write to the Help Desk