BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 121996
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.121996
Prognostic factors of depression and anxiety in infertile women with cesarean scar defects
Xiao-Bin Lin, Li-Li Luo, Ying-Xing Chen, Yu-Ping Li, Hui-Min You, Xiao-Fen Chen, Qiu-Ping Wei, Qiao-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Lan Huang
Xiao-Bin Lin, Yu-Ping Li, Qiao-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Lan Huang, Department of Gynecology, Army 73rd Group Military Hospital, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China
Li-Li Luo, Department of Obstetrics, Army 73rd Group Military Hospital, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China
Ying-Xing Chen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Army 73rd Group Military Hospital, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China
Hui-Min You, Qiu-Ping Wei, Department of Nursing, Army 73rd Group Military Hospital, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China
Xiao-Fen Chen, Department of Psychiatry, Army 73rd Group Military Hospital, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China
Co-first authors: Xiao-Bin Lin and Li-Li Luo.
Co-corresponding authors: Qiao-Yu Zhang and Xiao-Lan Huang.
Author contributions: Lin XB and Luo LL contributed equally to this work as co-first authors, and they were responsible for study conception, data collection, and manuscript drafting; Chen YX contributed to clinical assessment and data interpretation; Li YP, You HM, and Wei QP participated in patient follow-up and data organization; Chen XF conducted psychiatric and psychological evaluations; Zhang QY and Huang XL, as co-corresponding authors, supervised the study design, revised the manuscript, and gave final approval. Both meet all four ICMJE authorship criteria, and their dual designation reflects their equal and complementary supervisory contributions to this work. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.
AI contribution statement: The AI tool Kimi 2.6 (Moonshot AI) was used solely for language polishing and improving the sentence structure and expression of this manuscript. It was not used in any aspect of study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, or generation of scientific content.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Army 73rd Group Military Hospital (approval No. 73JYY2026215137).
Informed consent statement: Individual informed consent was waived in accordance with national guidelines applicable to retrospective, anonymized studies.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Corresponding author: Xiao-Lan Huang, Department of Gynecology, Army 73rd Group Military Hospital, No. 92-96 Wenyuan Road, Siming District, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China. huangxiaolana@163.com
Received: May 15, 2026
Revised: June 15, 2026
Accepted: August 10, 2026
Published online: October 19, 2026
Processing time: 148 Days and 0.9 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar defect (CSD) is a common complication of the uterine cesarean section that leads to secondary infertility. Women experiencing CSD-associated infertility have a dual psychologic burden: Fertility-related distress compounded by guilt and anxiety stemming from past surgical decisions. However, the prevalence of clinically significant depression and anxiety in this population, compared with that in the general population, and their independent effect on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, have not been comprehensively measured.

AIM

To analyze the psychological morbidity profile of women with CSD-associated infertility and to determine independent predictors for failure of ART through multivariate regression analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the General Hospital of the 73rd Group Army of the People’s Liberation Army (January 2016 to December 2024), enrolling 100 women with CSD confirmed by ultrasound or hysteroscopy and concurrent infertility who underwent assisted reproduction (ART). Baseline psychological status was assessed using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Fertility Quality of Life scale (FertiQoL) and Spousal Support Scale. CSD severity was defined according to residual myometrial thickness (RMT): Mild (≥ 3.5 mm), moderate (2.5-3.4 mm), or severe (< 2.5 mm). ART outcome data, including clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage, were collected. The type of the nursing intervention (routine vs comprehensive psychological nursing) was included as a covariable in the analyses. Independent prognostic factors for clinical pregnancy failure were identified by univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed based on CSD severity.

RESULTS

At baseline, 74% of participants had clinically significant anxiety (SAS score ≥ 50) and 68% had depression (SDS score ≥ 53); 56% had co-morbid anxiety and depression, a rate nearly doubled that observed in general infertile populations. There was a significant difference in psychological scores between pregnant and non-pregnant patients (SAS score: 54.2 ± 9.6 vs 62.7 ± 10.3, P < 0.001; SDS score: 52.1 ± 9.1 vs 61.4 ± 10.0, P < 0.001). CSD severity was a very strong stratifier of both psychological burden and ART outcomes: Clinical pregnancy rates were 74.3%, 54.1% and 17.9% for mild, moderate, and severe CSD, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified six independent prognostic factors for ART failure: SAS score [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per one-point increase = 0.949, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-0.987, P = 0.009], FertiQoL score (aOR = 1.060, P = 0.008), RMT (aOR = 1.629, P = 0.002), CSD severity (mild vs severe: aOR = 5.167, P = 0.005), co-morbid anxiety and depression (aOR = 0.306, P = 0.029), and spousal support score (aOR = 1.044, P = 0.040). The model had good discriminatory power (area under the curve = 0.821). Nursing intervention type was significantly associated with the outcome in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 2.732), but this association did not remain independently significant after full covariate adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Depression and anxiety are common among CSD-associated infertility women and are independent prognosticators for ART failure, alongside CSD severity and fertility-related quality of life. These findings support the integration of systematic psychological screening, CSD severity–based risk stratification, and spouse-involved supportive care as essential components of ART management in this population.

Keywords: Cesarean scar defect; Uterine niche; Depression; Anxiety; Infertility; Assisted reproductive technology; Prognostic factors; Fertility Quality of Life scale; Residual myometrial thickness

Core Tip: This retrospective cohort study is the first to systematically characterize the psychological burden of cesarean scar defect (CSD)-associated infertility and quantify its independent prognostic contribution to assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. Among the 100 women included, clinically significant anxiety and depression were detected in 74% and 68%, respectively—rates that nearly double those reported in general infertile populations. Multivariate logistic regression identified six independent prognostic factors for ART failure: Anxiety score, fertility-related quality of life, residual myometrial thickness, CSD severity, co-morbid anxiety and depression, and spousal support. These findings support routine psychological screening and CSD-severity-based risk stratification as essential components of ART management.

Write to the Help Desk