BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2025; 15(12): 112479
Published online Dec 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.112479
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
PICOS
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PopulationPatients diagnosed with ovarian cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy after surgeryPatients with other concomitant diseases
InterventionUsing CBT for treatment, but not limited to specific schools of thought within CBT theory, including the third wave, such as ACT, MBCT, DBT, etc.In addition to CBT, the experimental group also received other treatments
ComparisonCBT is not used, but specific treatment methods are not restrictedNo controlled study
OutcomeCancer-related fatigue, mental health status (such as anxiety and depression levels), and quality of life of patients; there are no restrictions on the scales used to assess the outcomesUnreliable or incomplete data
Study designRandomized controls trailsCase report, conference paper, review article and letter; duplicate literature or duplicate studies
Table 2 Characteristics of the six included studies[12-17]
Ref.CountryStudy designMulti-centerRegisteredRecord patient timeOvarian cancer patientsAge (T)Age (C)Sample size
Intervention (T)
Intervention (C)
Outcome
T (n)
C (n)
Frangou et al[12]United KingdomRCTYesYesNovember 2013 to January 2018Primary or relapsed epithelial OC58.1 ± 9.4660.9 ± 10.23433CBTStandard careDepression, QoL
Zhou et al[13]ChinaRCTNoNRJanuary 2018 to March 2019Meets the diagnostic criteria for OC58.64 ± 13.8260.23 ± 15.783736CBT + conventional nursingConventional nursingCancer-related fatigue, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, QoL
Zhang et al[14]ChinaRCTNoNRNovember 2014 to November 2015Ages of 18 and 80 with OCNRNR3334CBT + exerciseUsual careCancer-related fatigue, depression, sleep quality
Petzel et al[15]United StatesRCTYesYesSeptember 2012 to February 2013Stage III/IV or recurrent (any stage) epithelial OC59.6 ± 10.055.5 ± 8.41612Website based on CBTControl websiteDistress, depression, anxiety
Moonsammy et al[16]CanadaRCTNoNRMarch 2011 to July 2011Newly diagnosed with OC52.7 ± 12.157.8 ± 12.035CBTSurveillanceCancer-related fatigue, depression, anxiety
Rost et al[17]United StatesRCTNoNRNRWomen with stage III or IV OC56561516ACTTreatment as usualDistress, depression, anxiety, QoL, acceptance
Table 3 Characteristics of cognitive behavioral therapy treatment, n (%)
Ref.
Intervention (T) specific method
Intervention (C) specific method
CBT implementer
Intervention duration/frequency/total times or time
Intervention time point
Assessment time point
Follow-up time after treatment
Lost to follow-up
Frangou et al[12]CBT (face to face sessions)Standard careDoctoral-level clinical/counselling psychologist90 minutes/NR/3 monthsThe 6-12 weeks post-chemotherapyBaseline/after treatment 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24 months24 months40 (37.4)
Zhou et al[13]At-home CBT + conventional nursingConventional nursingNursesHalf an hour/3-4 times per week/NRIn the light of chemotherapyBaseline/after treatment 1, 2, 3 months3 months0 (0)
Zhang et al[14]Nurse-led home-based exercise + CBTNurse-led usual careCBT-trained nurses1 hour/once weekly/12 consecutive weeksBefore the sixth chemotherapy treatmentBaseline/immediately after treatment/3 month3 months3 (4.3)
Petzel et al[15]Visit website (social cognitive theory + CBT)Visit website (usual care materials)Medical and psychological providersUnlimited time/2-3 times per week/60 daysPost-operative checkup or planned chemotherapyBaseline/1 month1 month6 (17.1)
Moonsammy et al[16]CBT (counselling sessions by phone)SurveillanceCBT-trained nurses1 hour/once every two weeks/12 weeksBefore completing two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapyBaseline/immediately after intervention/3 months3 months5 (26.3)
Rost et al[17]ACT (face to face meetings)Treatment as usualA PhD-level clinical psychologist1 hour/4 months/12 occasionsIn the chemotherapy treatmentsBaseline/at the end of the 4th, 8th, and final (12th) sessionEnd of treatment16 (34)
Table 4 Meta-regression analysis of depression and anxiety
AnalysisDepression

Anxiety
Estimate (SE)
95%CI
P value
Estimate (SE)
95%CI
P value
Patients characteristics
Age0.02 (0.14)-0.26 to 0.290.8838-0.06 (0.04)-0.14 to 0.030.1733
China-0.91 (0.59)-2.06 to 0.240.1229
United States-0.22 (0.65)-1.48 to 1.050.7388-1.28 (0.56)-2.36 to -0.190.0217a
United Kingdom-0.16 (0.67)-1.46 to 1.150.8127-0.85 (0.59)-2.01 to 0.310.1497
Intervention methods
CBT/exercise-0.49 (0.43)-1.33 to 0.340.2485
I-CBT0.98 (0.55)-0.10 to 2.050.07670.06 (0.53)-0.98 to 1.100.9092
Traditional-CBT0.23 (0.41)-0.57 to 1.020.5727-0.27 (0.40)-1.06 to 0.510.4966
Assessment scales
CES-D0.68 (0.69)-0.66 to 2.030.3179STAI-Y0.88 (0.64)-0.37 to 2.140.1704
HADS0.98 (0.61)-0.21 to 2.160.1073HADS0.06 (0.53)-0.98 to 1.100.9092
PHQ-90.53 (0.53)-0.50 to 1.560.3157SAS-0.40 (0.40)-1.19 to 0.400.3266
SDS-0.22 (0.45)-1.10 to 0.660.6292
Nurse-led-0.56 (0.28)-1.12 to -0.000.0486a1.15 (0.55)0.08 to 2.220.0359a