Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2025; 15(12): 112479
Published online Dec 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.112479
Published online Dec 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.112479
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
| PICOS | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
| Population | Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy after surgery | Patients with other concomitant diseases |
| Intervention | Using CBT for treatment, but not limited to specific schools of thought within CBT theory, including the third wave, such as ACT, MBCT, DBT, etc. | In addition to CBT, the experimental group also received other treatments |
| Comparison | CBT is not used, but specific treatment methods are not restricted | No controlled study |
| Outcome | Cancer-related fatigue, mental health status (such as anxiety and depression levels), and quality of life of patients; there are no restrictions on the scales used to assess the outcomes | Unreliable or incomplete data |
| Study design | Randomized controls trails | Case report, conference paper, review article and letter; duplicate literature or duplicate studies |
| Ref. | Country | Study design | Multi-center | Registered | Record patient time | Ovarian cancer patients | Age (T) | Age (C) | Sample size | Intervention (T) | Intervention (C) | Outcome | |
| T | C | ||||||||||||
| Frangou et al[12] | United Kingdom | RCT | Yes | Yes | November 2013 to January 2018 | Primary or relapsed epithelial OC | 58.1 ± 9.46 | 60.9 ± 10.2 | 34 | 33 | CBT | Standard care | Depression, QoL |
| Zhou et al[13] | China | RCT | No | NR | January 2018 to March 2019 | Meets the diagnostic criteria for OC | 58.64 ± 13.82 | 60.23 ± 15.78 | 37 | 36 | CBT + conventional nursing | Conventional nursing | Cancer-related fatigue, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, QoL |
| Zhang et al[14] | China | RCT | No | NR | November 2014 to November 2015 | Ages of 18 and 80 with OC | NR | NR | 33 | 34 | CBT + exercise | Usual care | Cancer-related fatigue, depression, sleep quality |
| Petzel et al[15] | United States | RCT | Yes | Yes | September 2012 to February 2013 | Stage III/IV or recurrent (any stage) epithelial OC | 59.6 ± 10.0 | 55.5 ± 8.4 | 16 | 12 | Website based on CBT | Control website | Distress, depression, anxiety |
| Moonsammy et al[16] | Canada | RCT | No | NR | March 2011 to July 2011 | Newly diagnosed with OC | 52.7 ± 12.1 | 57.8 ± 12.0 | 3 | 5 | CBT | Surveillance | Cancer-related fatigue, depression, anxiety |
| Rost et al[17] | United States | RCT | No | NR | NR | Women with stage III or IV OC | 56 | 56 | 15 | 16 | ACT | Treatment as usual | Distress, depression, anxiety, QoL, acceptance |
Table 3 Characteristics of cognitive behavioral therapy treatment, n (%)
| Ref. | Intervention (T) specific method | Intervention (C) specific method | CBT implementer | Intervention duration/frequency/total times or time | Intervention time point | Assessment time point | Follow-up time after treatment | Lost to follow-up |
| Frangou et al[12] | CBT (face to face sessions) | Standard care | Doctoral-level clinical/counselling psychologist | 90 minutes/NR/3 months | The 6-12 weeks post-chemotherapy | Baseline/after treatment 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24 months | 24 months | 40 (37.4) |
| Zhou et al[13] | At-home CBT + conventional nursing | Conventional nursing | Nurses | Half an hour/3-4 times per week/NR | In the light of chemotherapy | Baseline/after treatment 1, 2, 3 months | 3 months | 0 (0) |
| Zhang et al[14] | Nurse-led home-based exercise + CBT | Nurse-led usual care | CBT-trained nurses | 1 hour/once weekly/12 consecutive weeks | Before the sixth chemotherapy treatment | Baseline/immediately after treatment/3 month | 3 months | 3 (4.3) |
| Petzel et al[15] | Visit website (social cognitive theory + CBT) | Visit website (usual care materials) | Medical and psychological providers | Unlimited time/2-3 times per week/60 days | Post-operative checkup or planned chemotherapy | Baseline/1 month | 1 month | 6 (17.1) |
| Moonsammy et al[16] | CBT (counselling sessions by phone) | Surveillance | CBT-trained nurses | 1 hour/once every two weeks/12 weeks | Before completing two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy | Baseline/immediately after intervention/3 months | 3 months | 5 (26.3) |
| Rost et al[17] | ACT (face to face meetings) | Treatment as usual | A PhD-level clinical psychologist | 1 hour/4 months/12 occasions | In the chemotherapy treatments | Baseline/at the end of the 4th, 8th, and final (12th) session | End of treatment | 16 (34) |
Table 4 Meta-regression analysis of depression and anxiety
| Analysis | Depression | Anxiety | |||||
| Estimate (SE) | 95%CI | P value | Estimate (SE) | 95%CI | P value | ||
| Patients characteristics | |||||||
| Age | 0.02 (0.14) | -0.26 to 0.29 | 0.8838 | -0.06 (0.04) | -0.14 to 0.03 | 0.1733 | |
| China | -0.91 (0.59) | -2.06 to 0.24 | 0.1229 | ||||
| United States | -0.22 (0.65) | -1.48 to 1.05 | 0.7388 | -1.28 (0.56) | -2.36 to -0.19 | 0.0217a | |
| United Kingdom | -0.16 (0.67) | -1.46 to 1.15 | 0.8127 | -0.85 (0.59) | -2.01 to 0.31 | 0.1497 | |
| Intervention methods | |||||||
| CBT/exercise | -0.49 (0.43) | -1.33 to 0.34 | 0.2485 | ||||
| I-CBT | 0.98 (0.55) | -0.10 to 2.05 | 0.0767 | 0.06 (0.53) | -0.98 to 1.10 | 0.9092 | |
| Traditional-CBT | 0.23 (0.41) | -0.57 to 1.02 | 0.5727 | -0.27 (0.40) | -1.06 to 0.51 | 0.4966 | |
| Assessment scales | |||||||
| CES-D | 0.68 (0.69) | -0.66 to 2.03 | 0.3179 | STAI-Y | 0.88 (0.64) | -0.37 to 2.14 | 0.1704 |
| HADS | 0.98 (0.61) | -0.21 to 2.16 | 0.1073 | HADS | 0.06 (0.53) | -0.98 to 1.10 | 0.9092 |
| PHQ-9 | 0.53 (0.53) | -0.50 to 1.56 | 0.3157 | SAS | -0.40 (0.40) | -1.19 to 0.40 | 0.3266 |
| SDS | -0.22 (0.45) | -1.10 to 0.66 | 0.6292 | ||||
| Nurse-led | -0.56 (0.28) | -1.12 to -0.00 | 0.0486a | 1.15 (0.55) | 0.08 to 2.22 | 0.0359a | |
- Citation: Zhao F, Bo Y, Su XL. Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on cancer-related fatigue and psychological status in ovarian cancer patients: A meta-analysis. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(12): 112479
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i12/112479.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.112479
