BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2025; 15(11): 112206
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.112206
Table 1 Summary of twin studies investigating dermatoglyphic abnormalities in psychotic disorders
Study
Location
Twin type
Sample composition
Psychiatric diagnoses
Dermatoglyphic findings
United Kingdom studyMaudsley hospital, United KingdomMonozy-gotic11 normal control pairs; 16 concordant pairs; 9 discordant pairs; 2 triplets (1 concordant, 1 partially affected)PsychosisRD and APFC abnormalities mirrored psychosis discordance in discordant twins
United States studyNIMH twin registry, United StatesMonozy-gotic31 discordant pairs; 20 SZ/schizoaffective; 8 bipolar; 3 other psychosis; 19 concordant pairs; 11 SZ/schizoaffective; 3 SZ + schizotypal; 5 mixed psychosis/affective/schizotypalSchizophrenia, bipolar, schizoaffective, other psychosisInvestigated RD and APFC to test whether dermatoglyphic discordance parallels clinical discordance
Table 2 Prevalence of dermatoglyphic abnormalities among monozygotic twin pairs discordant and concordant for psychotic disorders
Twin pair type
Psychosis status
APFC (%)
RCD (%)
Any abnormality (APFC or RCD, %)
Discordant twins (n = 31)Affected twin36.09.7Significantly higher than non-affected
Non-affected twin16.06.5Lower than affected co-twin
Concordant twins (n = 19)Affected twins (both)32.410.5Moderate