Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2025.
    
    
        World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2025; 15(11): 106956
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106956
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106956
            Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, n (%)
        
    | Index | Intervention group (n = 60) | Control group (n = 55) | P value | 
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 68.5 ± 8.2 | 67.8 ± 7.5 | 0.712 | 
| Gender | |||
| Male | 35 (58.3) | 34 (61.8) | 0.621 | 
| Female | 25 (41.7) | 21 (38.2) | 0.621 | 
| Age of diagnosis (years), mean ± SD | 62.0 ± 10.5 | 61.5 ± 9.8 | 0.812 | 
| Duration of diabetes (years), mean ± SD | 8.6 ± 5.2 | 8.3 ± 4.9 | 0.725 | 
| Duration of DFU (months), mean ± SD | 6.0 ± 3.1 | 5.8 ± 2.9 | 0.668 | 
| Smoking history | - | 0.762 | - | 
| Active smoking | 15 (25.0) | 12 (21.8) | - | 
| Previous/never smoker | 45 (75.0) | 43 (78.2) | - | 
| Hypertension | 32 (53.3) | 30 (54.5) | 0.882 | 
| Dyslipidemia | 28 (46.7) | 27 (49.1) | 0.826 | 
| Overweight/obesity | 30 (50.0) | 29 (52.7) | 0.842 | 
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 28.1 ± 4.7 | 27.9 ± 4.6 | 0.579 | 
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean ± SD | 135.6 ± 15.3 | 133.2 ± 14.7 | 0.347 | 
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean ± SD | 85.4 ± 10.2 | 84.5 ± 9.8 | 0.422 | 
| Hemoglobin (g/dL), mean ± SD | 13.5 ± 1.2 | 13.3 ± 1.1 | 0.384 | 
| WBC (× 109/L), mean ± SD | 9.2 ± 2.1 | 9.5 ± 2.4 | 0.532 | 
| Platelet (× 109/L), mean ± SD | 250 ± 50 | 245 ± 48 | 0.717 | 
| Albumin (g/dL), mean ± SD | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 0.597 | 
| ALT (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 24.1 ± 6.5 | 23.8 ± 6.0 | 0.683 | 
| eGFR (mL/minute/1.73 m2), mean ± SD | 85.6 ± 10.3 | 84.5 ± 9.7 | 0.606 | 
            Table 2 Comparison of ulcer location distribution between the two groups, n (%)
        
    | Place of the ulcer | Intervention group (n = 60) | Control group (n = 55) | P value | 
| Calcaneus | 12 (20.0) | 10 (18.2) | 0.873 | 
| Dorsum | 10 (16.7) | 12 (21.8) | 0.541 | 
| Metatarsus | 14 (23.3) | 13 (23.6) | 0.98 | 
| Toes | 9 (15.0) | 8 (14.5) | 0.951 | 
| Midfoot | 15 (25.0) | 12 (21.8) | 0.643 | 
            Table 3 Comparison of wound healing rates between the two groups
        
    | Group | Wound healing rate (%) | Number of participants (n) | Number of healed wounds | 
| Intervention group | 91.7 | 60 | 55 | 
| Control group | 76.4 | 55 | 42 | 
            Table 4 Comparison of Hamilton Anxiety and Hamilton Depression scores between the two groups
        
    | Index | Control group (n = 55) | Intervention group (n = 60) | P value | 
| HAMA | 18.37 ± 3.02 | 13.01 ± 2.13 | < 0.001 | 
| HAMD | 17.35 ± 2.95 | 12.93 ± 2.04 | 0.002 | 
- Citation: Jiang C, Guan RN, Shu Y, Zhang L, Mao XP, Nie Q, Zhu HF. Impact of multidisciplinary nursing interventions and blood glucose control on diabetic foot ulcer healing, patient emotions, and satisfaction. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 106956
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i11/106956.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106956
 
