INTRODUCTION
Depression has emerged as a pressing global public health challenge, casting a shadow over the lives of approximately 357.44 million people[1]. Among those affected, young and middle-aged adults bear a heavy burden. As the backbone of families, workforces, and communities, they juggle career pressures, caregiving responsibilities, and financial stressors. Yet their mental health is often overlooked until symptoms escalate.
Subthreshold depressive symptoms (SDS), although not meeting the full diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD), is far from trivial[2]. It includes persistent low mood, reduced interest in daily activities, and fatigue - symptoms that chip away at quality of life and frequently progress to MDD if unaddressed[3,4]. MDD, in turn, brings debilitating consequences: It impairs cognitive function, strains relationships, and even increases the risk of self-harm[5]. However, what many fail to recognize, is that a significant portion of these depression cases can be traced back to a hidden root: Childhood maltreatment[6].
Since the 1990s, accumulating evidence has demonstrated the connection between adverse childhood experiences and adult mental health[7,8]. Research on neurobiological mechanisms has also revealed that there are epigenetic changes and dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in childhood trauma-related depression[9]. The study by Shi et al[10] has sharpened the focus. It aims at emotional abuse and neglect, two often invisible forms of maltreatment, and their long-term impact. Unlike physical abuse, which leaves visible scars, emotional abuse (such as constant criticism, humiliation, or manipulation) and emotional neglect (the absence of emotional support, affection, or responsiveness to a child’s needs) leave deep psychological wounds that fester over time[11]. This study reveals a strong association among childhood maltreatment, SDS, and MDD across age groups and clarifies that to tackle depression in young and middle-aged adults, we must first confront the legacy of childhood emotional trauma.
WHY EMOTIONAL NEGLECT AND ABUSE STAND OUT?
The results of this study are enlightening, particularly regarding the role of emotional abuse and neglect. Across all age groups of the young and middle-aged adults surveyed, those with a history of emotional abuse or neglect faced a significantly higher risk of developing SDS and MDD[10]. Emotional neglect can cause great harm to teenagers[12,13]. Why is emotional neglect so damaging? Childhood is a period of profound psychological growth, where children learn to regulate emotions, build self-esteem, and trust others - skills that depend entirely on consistent emotional nourishment. A child who is emotionally neglected grows up in an “emotional desert”: They never learn that their feelings matter, that they are worthy of love, or how to cope with stress in healthy ways. As adults, these gaps become glaring. A middle-aged professional who was emotionally neglected as a child, for example, may crumble under workplace pressure, slipping into SDS because they lack the resilience to manage stress. Over time, this can easily escalate to MDD as feelings of worthlessness and hopelessness take hold[4].
Emotional abuse is still a major risk factor[14]. Children subjected to constant criticism or humiliation internalize these negative messages, developing a harsh inner voice that persists into adulthood. A young adult who was told they were “useless” as a child may blame themselves for every setback, making them far more susceptible to depression when faced with life’s inevitable challenges.
EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT
If trauma-informed care is the solution for treating depression[15,16], then early identification of childhood maltreatment is the key to preventing it. The study emphasizes that catching maltreatment early and intervening promptly can break the cycle that leads to SDS and MDD in adulthood[10]. However, early identification is not the responsibility of any single group; it requires collaboration between families, schools, healthcare providers, and communities.
The family environment is fundamental to a child’s psychological development, as children spend most of their formative years at home. Even with robust external support systems, if a child must return to a stressful or oppressive family environment, their risk for MDD remains high[5,17]. Therefore, improving parental awareness is critical for early trauma identification. Although some family focused policies exist, such as sexual abuse prevention curricula, their implementation rate is often low[18]. Furthermore, it is important to extend this education beyond parents to other primary caregivers, such as grandparents in dual income households to ensure all key figures in a child's life are equipped to support their mental health[19].
Schools play a critical role[20]. Teachers and school counselors are often the first to notice signs of maltreatment in children, such as sudden changes in behavior, withdrawal from peers, or poor academic performance. By training educators to recognize these red flags and connect families to support services, schools can stop emotional abuse and neglect before they leave lasting scars. For example, a teacher who notices that a child is consistently quiet and unresponsive could refer the family to a local child welfare agency or mental health clinic, ensuring the child gets the emotional support they need.
Healthcare providers also play a part[21,22]. Pediatricians and family doctors can screen for childhood maltreatment during regular check-ups, asking gentle questions about a child’s home life and emotional well-being. They can also educate parents about the importance of emotional support, helping them understand that neglecting a child’s emotional needs is just as harmful as physical abuse.
Communities must step up. Local organizations can offer parenting classes that teach caregivers how to provide emotional support, manage stress, and build positive parent-child relationships. They can also raise awareness about childhood maltreatment, challenging the myth that it is a “private family matter” and encouraging people to speak up if they suspect a child is being harmed.
For young and middle-aged adults who already have a history of childhood maltreatment, early identification of SDS is equally important. Primary care doctors can screen for SDS during routine visits, asking about mood, energy levels, and interest in daily activities. By catching SDS early, they can refer patients to counseling or support groups, preventing the progression to MDD.
TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE IN DEPRESSION MANAGEMENT
The study not only identifies a problem, but points to a clear solution: Integrating trauma-informed care into depression management[10]. Traditional approaches to treating depression often focus on symptom relief, prescribing medication or generic talk therapy without addressing the underlying trauma[23]. This “one-size-fits-all” method frequently falls short for individuals with a history of childhood maltreatment, as it fails to acknowledge how past trauma shapes their current mental health.
Trauma-informed care, by contrast, starts with a simple but powerful question: “What happened to you?” rather than “What’s wrong with you?” It recognizes that depression symptoms, such as avoidance, mistrust, or emotional numbness, may be adaptive responses to past trauma, not just “abnormal” behaviors. For a young adult with MDD who experienced emotional abuse as a child, this means that their therapist will not only focus on reducing their low mood, but also help them heal the pain of their past, challenge the negative beliefs they developed as a child, and build healthier coping mechanisms[24].
The benefits of this approach are clear. Research shows that it improves treatment adherence, reduces symptom recurrence, and helps patients build long-term resilience[15]. However, despite its effectiveness, it remains underused in many clinical settings. Part of the problem is a lack of training: Many mental health professionals receive little education on recognizing or addressing childhood trauma[25]. Another barrier is stigma, both for patients, who may feel ashamed to share their past experiences, and for providers, who may underestimate the prevalence of childhood maltreatment.
To address this, healthcare systems must invest in training programs that instruct clinicians about trauma-informed practices. They should also create safe, non-judgmental spaces where patients feel comfortable disclosing their trauma. By centering trauma-informed care in depression management, we can ensure that individuals with a history of childhood maltreatment get the care they need to heal, not just from their depression, but from the wounds of their past.
CONCLUSION
The study on childhood maltreatment and depression in young and middle-aged adults is more than just research, it is a call to action. It reminds us that depression is not a random misfortune, but often a consequence of unaddressed childhood trauma. Protecting the mental health of young and middle-aged adults is not only a moral imperative, but also an economic and social one. Policymakers must allocate funding to expand trauma-informed care training and support services for children and families. Healthcare systems must integrate trauma screening and intervention into routine care. Schools must invest in educator training and student support programs. In addition, each of us must play a role by being vigilant for signs of childhood maltreatment, supporting survivors of trauma, and challenging the stigma that surrounds mental health and abuse. With commitment, collaboration, and compassion, we can help young and middle-aged adults heal from their past, overcome depression, and live healthy and fulfilling lives.
Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Psychiatry
Country of origin: China
Peer-review report’s classification
Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C
Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B
Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C, Grade C
Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
P-Reviewer: Agussalim A, PhD, Associate Professor, Indonesia; Xin YJ, PhD, Assistant Professor, China; Zhang XB, PhD, Professor, China S-Editor: Bai Y L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang YL