Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. May 19, 2026; 16(5): 114680
Published online May 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i5.114680
Published online May 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i5.114680
Figure 1 Psychological status comparison.
A: Pre- and post-interventional anxiety assessment; B: Pre- and post-interventional depression evaluation. aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01 vs pre-intervention; cP < 0.05 vs control group. GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Figure 2 Comparative analysis of psychological resilience.
A: Tenacity dimension scores between groups; B: Strength dimension score comparison; C: Optimism dimension scores evaluation. aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01 vs control group.
Figure 3 Comparative pain evaluation.
A: Numeric Rating Scale scores pre- and post-intervention; B: Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire results pre- and post-treatment. aP < 0.05 and bP < 0.01 vs before nursing; cP < 0.05 vs control. NRS: Numeric Rating Scale; SF-MPQ-2: Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire.
- Citation: Zhang T, Liang HX, Cao LD, Hu SS. Clinical nursing pathways and psychological care in early liver cancer surgery patients: Effects on anxiety, depression, and pain. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(5): 114680
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i5/114680.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i5.114680