BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Field of Vision
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Psychiatry. Feb 19, 2024; 14(2): 215-224
Published online Feb 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i2.215
Cognitive dissonance and mindset perturbations during crisis: “eco-socio-psycho-somatic” perspectives
Felix Tretter, Henriette Löffler-Stastka
Felix Tretter, Department of Systems Medicine and Healthcare Systems, Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna 1040, Austria
Henriette Löffler-Stastka, Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria
Author contributions: Tretter F and Löffler-Stastka H contributed to writing, editing, and revising of this paper.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Corresponding author: Henriette Löffler-Stastka, MD, PhD, Dean, Director, Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, No. 18-20 Währinger Gürtel, Vienna 1090, Austria. henriette.loeffler-stastka@meduniwien.ac.at
Received: September 12, 2023
Peer-review started: September 12, 2023
First decision: December 6, 2023
Revised: December 8, 2023
Accepted: January 3, 2024
Article in press: January 3, 2024
Published online: February 19, 2024
Processing time: 146 Days and 15.7 Hours
Core Tip

Core Tip: With the emergence of an increasingly fragmented and crisis-ridden world, sound containment and mentalization capacities are required. We provide a stepped multidimensional socioecological theoretical framework that serves as a heuristic reference model. The example of the pandemic crisis is transferable and related to other ecological approaches. Parameters for sustainable and enduring change processes are given.

Write to the Help Desk