Published online Sep 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.117965
Revised: March 15, 2026
Accepted: July 14, 2026
Published online: September 19, 2026
Processing time: 247 Days and 20.4 Hours
Depression is a leading global cause of disability, and its high relapse rates are closely linked to poor medication adherence. Current pharmaceutical care models for depression often lack continuity between hospital and home, limiting their long-term efficacy. Structured, continuous care models are needed to close this gap.
To evaluate the efficacy of a medication therapy management (MTM)-based “in-hospital assessment - home-based intervention” pharmaceutical care model in depression.
This single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 104 adults with depression, who were randomly assigned 1:1 to an intervention group (MTM-based “in-hospital assessment – home-based intervention” pharmaceutical care) or a control group (conventional care). The primary outcomes were me
Compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly higher medication adherence (76.92% vs 46.15% at 9 months, P < 0.05), greater reductions in depression symptom scores, a lower 9-month relapse rate (9.62% vs 23.08%, P < 0.05), and reduced healthcare resource utilization (all P < 0.05).
The MTM-based “in-hospital assessment - home-based intervention” pharmaceutical care model is associated with improved clinical outcomes in adults with depression.
Core Tip: To our knowledge, this is the first medication therapy management-based “in-hospital assessment - home-based intervention” model for depression care, addressing treatment discontinuity. It significantly improved 9-month medication adherence from 46.15% to 76.92% and reduced the 9-month relapse rate from 23.08% to 9.62% compared with conventional care. The model was associated with a 66.7% reduction in hospitalization risk, a 38.1% reduction in direct medical costs, and a 25-percentage-point reduction in the incidence of adverse drug reactions, offering an efficient pathway for comprehensive depression management. Standardized effect sizes (Cohen’s d) for primary outcome was 1.24, indicating large clinical benefits.