Wang JH, Jia SY, Zhao KG, Meng T, Ren YM, Gao X, Sun P. Psychological well-being and multimodal predictors of operational safety in heavy-haul railway drivers. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(8): 120114 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.120114]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Pei Sun, Faculty of Health and Wellness, City University of Macau, Avenida Padre Tomás Pereira, Taipa, Macao 999078, China. peisun@cityu.edu.mo
Research Domain of This Article
Psychology, Applied
Article-Type of This Article
research-article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Wang JH, Jia SY, Zhao KG, Meng T, Ren YM, Gao X, Sun P. Psychological well-being and multimodal predictors of operational safety in heavy-haul railway drivers. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(8): 120114 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.120114]
Jian-Hua Wang, Ting Meng, Jiliang Company, Guoneng Shuohuang Railway Development Co., Ltd, Cangzhou 061100, Hebei Province, China
Shu-Yi Jia, Yan-Ming Ren, Xin Gao, Pei Sun, Faculty of Health and Wellness, City University of Macau, Macao 999078, China
Kai-Gong Zhao, Department of Safety and Environmental Protection Supervision, National Energy Investment Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
Co-first authors: Jian-Hua Wang and Shu-Yi Jia.
Co-corresponding authors: Yan-Ming Ren and Pei Sun.
Author contributions: Wang JH and Jia SY contributed equally to this work as co-first authors; Wang JH, Zhao KG, Ren YM, and Sun P conceived and designed the study; Wang JH, Meng T, and Gao X collected and organized the data; Ren YM performed the statistical analyses; Jia SY drafted the manuscript; Wang JH, Ren YM, Gao X, and Sun P critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; Sun P and Ren YM supervised the study and made equal contributions as co-corresponding authors; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of City University of Macau, No. FHW-ER-2425-129.
Informed consent statement: All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available because they were derived from routine operational monitoring within a railway company and may contain potentially identifiable occupational information. The data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with permission from the relevant organization.
Corresponding author: Pei Sun, Faculty of Health and Wellness, City University of Macau, Avenida Padre Tomás Pereira, Taipa, Macao 999078, China. peisun@cityu.edu.mo
Received: February 24, 2026 Revised: March 20, 2026 Accepted: April 24, 2026 Published online: August 19, 2026 Processing time: 165 Days and 16.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Operational safety in heavy-haul railway systems is influenced not only by technical competence, but also by drivers’ psychological and physiological functioning. However, the relative contributions of psychological well-being, cognitive performance, and physiological indicators to real-world operational safety remain unclear.
AIM
To examine the associations of psychological well-being, cognitive task performance, and physiological indicators with operational safety among heavy-haul railway drivers.
METHODS
This observational study included 1117 operational records from 203 heavy-haul railway drivers. Psychological well-being was assessed using a multidimensional questionnaire covering mental fatigue, workload, self-efficacy, stress level, and emotional state. Cognitive performance was assessed using a rotating battery of computerized tasks, including Stroop, target tracking, ligature test, digit memory, BallSport, and Balloon tasks. A composite physiological indicator was derived from routine multimodal monitoring data. Operational safety was defined as full-score vs non-full-score performance. The overall psychological well-being score and other analytic predictors were entered into Poisson event-rate models with offset terms to estimate the associations of psychological well-being, cognitive task.
RESULTS
Higher overall psychological well-being was associated with a lower rate of non-full-score operational events at the driver level [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.99, P = 0.040]. In contrast, cognitive task indicators did not show stable independent associations with operational risk across task-specific models. The physiological indicator was not significantly associated with event rates overall (IRR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.65-1.22, P = 0.510), but showed a significant protective association in the digit memory subsample (IRR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.09-0.68, P = 0.012). Overall, operational safety appeared to be more consistently related to general psychological well-being than to isolated cognitive task performance, whereas the effect of physiological indicators may vary across cognitive load conditions.
CONCLUSION
Psychological well-being was a relatively stable protective correlate of operational safety among heavy-haul railway drivers, whereas individual cognitive task indicators showed limited independent explanatory value. Physiological indicators may have context-dependent relevance under specific cognitive load conditions. These findings support the value of multimodal safety assessment frameworks that prioritize psychological well-being while integrating cognitive and physiological information in a context-sensitive manner.
Core Tip: This observational study examined whether psychological well-being, cognitive task performance, and physiological indicators were associated with operational safety in heavy-haul railway drivers. Using 1117 operational records from 203 drivers, we found that higher overall psychological well-being was associated with a lower rate of non-full-score operational events. Individual cognitive task indicators did not show stable independent associations, whereas physiological indicators showed a context-dependent protective association in the digit memory subsample. These findings support multimodal safety assessment frameworks that prioritize psychological well-being.
