Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124485
Revised: July 23, 2026
Accepted: August 31, 2026
Published online: November 19, 2026
Processing time: 135 Days and 6 Hours
When students perceive artificial intelligence (AI) as a threat to their career prospects (an environmental factor), this perception may elicit self-doubt (a cognitive factor), which in turn may lead to avoidance of academic challenges (a behavioral response), ultimately contributing to anxiety or depression (psychological outcomes). However, to date, the literature lacks empirical evidence supporting this viewpoint within university student samples.
To explore the associations between multidimensional AI attitudes and mental health outcomes among Chinese university students, and to examine the non
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 2736 undergraduate students from China. Linear regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, and path analysis were applied to examine the relationships between AI attitudes (anxiety, job insecurity, self-doubt, and procrastination), self-efficacy, and mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, stress, loneliness, suicidal ideation, and non-suicidal self-injury).
Students’ AI attitudes showed a differentiated structure, characterized by low anxiety (9.5%), high job insecurity (50.4%), and moderate levels of self-doubt (25.6%) and procrastination (36.8%). All four AI attitude dimensions positively predicted poor mental health, with procrastination emerging as the strongest predictor. The RCS analysis revealed heterogeneous nonlinear relationships: AI-related anxiety showed nonlinearity for most outcomes, self-doubt and procrastination only for severe outcomes, while job insecurity exhibited stable linearity. Path analysis confirmed that self-efficacy played a partial mediating role in the AI attitude-mental health link.
AI attitudes are associated with complex linear and nonlinear impacts on university students’ mental health, with self-efficacy serving as a key mediating mechanism. These correlational findings provide an empirical reference for targeted mental health interventions and AI literacy education in higher education settings.
Core Tip: This study explored the associations between artificial intelligence (AI) attitudes and mental health outcomes among 2736 college students. It identified distinct linear and nonlinear relationships across four dimensions of AI attitudes, and confirmed that general self-efficacy played a partial mediating role in these associations.