BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Exp Med. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 117125
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v16.i1.117125
Table 1 Comparison of plaque scores at different time intervals
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value
Baseline302.220.64186.90.0011Baseline302.20.52327.820.0011
1 month300.320.041 month300.320.04
3 months300.820.43 months300.590.05
Table 2 Pairwise comparison of plaque scores within the groups
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Mean
SD
MD
P value

Mean
SD
MD
P value
Baseline2.220.641.9070.0011Baseline2.20.521.8830.0011
1 month0.320.041 month0.320.04
1 month0.320.04-0.4990.00111 month0.320.04-2.690.0011
3 months0.820.43 months0.590.05
3 months0.820.4-1.4080.00113 months0.590.05-1.6140.0011
Baseline2.220.64Baseline2.220.52
Table 3 Comparison of modified sulcus bleeding scores at different time intervals
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value
Baseline302.040.44219.120.0011Baseline301.980.53131.170.0011
1 month300.480.361 month300.540.42
3 months301.10.23 months301.150.27
Table 4 Pairwise comparison within the groups
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Mean
SD
MD
P value

Mean
SD
MD
P value
Baseline2.040.441.560.0011Baseline1.980.531.4350.0011
1 month0.480.361 month0.540.42
1 month0.480.36-0.6320.00111 month0.540.42-0.6070.0011
3 months1.10.23 months1.150.27
3 months1.10.2-0.9430.00113 months1.150.27-0.8280.0011
Baseline2.040.44Baseline1.980.53
Table 5 Comparison of probing pocket depth at different time intervals
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value
Baseline3071.08365.530.0011Baseline306.71.104198.110.0011
1 month303.260.521 month303.730.63
3 months303.130.623 months303.760.77
Table 6 Pairwise comparison within the groups
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Mean
SD
MD
P value

Mean
SD
MD
P value
Baseline71.083.7330.0011Baseline6.71.1043.030.0011
1 month3.260.521 month3.730.63
1 month3.260.520.1330.871 month3.730.63-0.0330.99
3 months3.130.62NS3 months3.760.77
3 months3.130.62-3.860.00113 months3.760.77-30.0011
Baseline71.08Baseline6.71.104
Table 7 Comparison of Mean relative clinical attachment level at different time interval in both groups
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value

Number
Mean
SD
F
P value
Baseline30121.01445.70.0011Baseline3012.231.16629.30.0011
1 month308.260.521 month308.70.98
3 months308.40.623 months308.90.99
Table 8 Pairwise comparison within the groups
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP

Mean
SD
MD
P value

Mean
SD
MD
P value
Baseline121.013.730.0011Baseline12.21.163.50.0011
1 month8.260.521 month8.70.98
1 month8.260.52-0.1330.311 month8.70.98-0.1670.068
3 months8.40.62NS3 months8.90.99NS
3 months8.40.62-3.60.00113 months8.90.99-3.330.0011
Baseline121.01Baseline12.21.16
Table 9 Distribution of BANA scores at different time interval in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with indocyanine green-doped chitosan nanoparticles group, n (%)

Negative
Weak positive
Positive
Total
P value
Baseline3 (10)10 (33.3)17 (56.7)30 (100)0.0011
Right after therapy17 (56.7)13 (43.3)030 (100)
1 month24 (80)6 (20)030 (100)
3 months24 (80)6 (20)030 (100)
Total68 (56.7)35 (29.2)17 (14.2)120 (100)
Table 10 Distribution of BANA scores at different time interval in conventional scaling and root planning group, n (%)

Negative
Weak positive
Positive
Total
P value
Baseline2 (6.7)11 (36.7)17 (56.7)30 (100)0.07
Right after therapy5 (16.7)19 (63.3)6 (20)30 (100)NS
1 month2 (6.7)13 (43.3)15 (50)30 (100)
3 months2 (6.7)11 (36.7)17 (56.7)30 (100)
Total11 (9.2)54 (45)55 (45.8)120 (100)
Table 11 Comparison of Mean plaque scores between the groups at different time intervals
Plaque index

Number
Mean
SD
t
P value
BaselineaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP302.220.640.1590.84
Conventional SRP302.20.52NS
1 monthaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP300.320.0400.99
Conventional SRP300.320.04NS
3 monthsaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP300.820.43.070.0051
Conventional SRP300.590.05
Table 12 Comparison of mean modified sulcus bleeding scores between the groups at different time intervals
Modified sulcus bleeding index
Number
Mean
SD
t
P value
BaselineaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP302.040.440.520.6
Conventional SRP301.980.53NS
1 monthaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP300.480.36-0.630.52
Conventional SRP300.540.42NS
3 monthsaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP301.1040.2-0.7870.43
Conventional SRP301.150.27NS
Table 13 Comparison of mean probing pocket depth between the groups at different time intervals

Probing pocket depth
Number
Mean
SD
t
P value
BaselineaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP3071.080.8260.41
Conventional SRP306.761.1NS
1 monthaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP303.260.52-3.090.0031
Conventional SRP303.730.63
3 monthsaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP303.130.62-3.490.0011
Conventional SRP303.770.77
Table 14 Comparison of Mean relative clinical attachment level between the groups at different time intervals

Relative clinical attachment level
Number
Mean
SD
t
P value
BaselineaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP30121.017-0.8260.41
Conventional SRP3012.231.16NS
1 monthaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP308.260.52-2.30.0261
Conventional SRP308.70.98
3 monthsaPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP308.40.62-2.330.0231
Conventional SRP308.90.99
Table 15 Comparison of BANA test scores at baseline between the groups, n (%)
Baseline
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP
Total
P value
Negative3 (10)2 (6.7)5 (8.3)0.88
Weak positive10 (33.3)11 (36.7)21 (35)NS
Positive17 (56.7)17 (56.7)34 (56.7)
Total30 (100)30 (100)60 (100)
Table 16 Comparison of BANA test scores at right after therapy between the groups, n (%)
Right after therapy
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP
Total
P value
Negative17 (56.7)5 (16.7)22 (36.7)0.0011
Weak positive13 (43.3)19 (63.3)32 (53.3)
Positive06 (20)6 (10)
Total30 (100)30 (100)60 (100)
Table 17 Comparison of BANA test scores after 1 month between the groups, n (%)
After 1 month
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP
Total
P value
Negative24 (80)2 (6.7)26 (43.3)0.0011
Weak positive6 (20)13 (43.3)19 (31.7)
Positive015 (50)15 (25)
Total30 (100)30 (100)60 (100)
Table 18 Comparison of BANA test scores after 3 months between the groups, n (%)
After 3 month
aPDT with CNPs-ICG + SRP
Conventional SRP
Total
P value
Negative24 (80)2 (6.7)26 (43.3)0.0011
Weak positive6 (20)11 (36.7)17 (28.3)
Positive017 (56.7)17 (28.3)
Total30 (100)30 (100)60 (100)