BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 115147
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.115147
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population (n = 250), n (%)/mean ± SD
Parameter
Value
Mean age (years)9.8 ± 4.1
Gender
    Boys135 (54)
    Girls115 (46)
Stone location
    Distal ureter76 (30.4)
    Mid-ureter70 (28)
    Proximal ureter104 (41.6)
Mean stone size (mm)10.2 ± 0.1
Fragmentation method
    Laser lithotripsy145 (58)
    Pneumatic lithotripsy105 (42)
Stone-free rate (%)92
Complication rate31 (12.4)
Average surgery duration (minutes)42.8 ± 16.3
    Laser lithotripsy40.5 ± 18.5
    Pneumatic lithotripsy45.1 ± 11.3
Stent placement rate30 (12)
Mean hospital stay (days)2.3 ± 0.5
Table 2 Stone size and location distribution (n = 250)
Parameter
Proximal (group 1)
Mid-ureter (group 2)
Distal (group 3)
P (ANOVA)
P1 (Tukey 1 vs 2)
P1 (Tukey 1 vs 3)
P1 (Tukey 2 vs 3)
Patients (%)104 (41.6)70 (28)76 (30.4)----
Stone size (mm)10.2 ± 1.39.2 ± 1.310.6 ± 1.20.030.010.20.02
Table 3 Comparison of endoscopic ureterolithotripsy outcomes by stone location
Parameter
Proximal (n = 104)
Mid-ureter (n = 70)
Distal (n = 76)
P (ANOVA)
P (Tukey post hoc)
Stone size (mm)10.2 ± 1.39.2 ± 1.310.6 ± 1.20.03Mid vs distal (P < 0.05)
Stone-free rate (%)9189940.07-
Operative time (minutes)44.5 ± 12.342.1 ± 11.841.0 ± 10.90.10-
Complication rate (%)10.511.39.20.74-
Hospital stay (days)2.4 ± 0.52.3 ± 0.52.2 ± 0.40.20-
Table 4 Comparison of laser vs pneumatic lithotripsy
Parameter
Laser lithotripsy (n = 145)
Pneumatic lithotripsy (n = 105)
P value
Stone-free rate (%)92.491.40.08
Operative time (minutes)40.5 ± 18.545.1 ± 11.30.10
Complication rate10.3% (15/145)15.2% (16/105)0.25
Hospital stay (days)2.4 ± 0.62.2 ± 0.40.20
Table 5 Comparison of endoscopic ureterolithotripsy outcomes by age group
Parameter
4-7 years (n = 19)
8-10 years (n = 40)
11-14 years (n = 75)
15-18 years (n = 116)
P (ANOVA)
P (Tukey post hoc)
Stone-free rate (%)899194960.12-
Operative time (minutes)49.3 ± 12.545.8 ± 10.241.2 ± 9.839.5 ± 8.70.034-7 vs 15-18 (P < 0.05)
Complication rate (%)15.512.08.05.70.024-7 vs 11-14, 15-18 (P < 0.05)
Hospital stay (days)2.6 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.52.2 ± 0.52.0 ± 0.40.044-7 vs 15-18 (P < 0.05)
Table 6 Intraoperative and postoperative complications by age group (n = 31), n (%)
Complication
4-7 years (n = 19)
8-10 years (n = 40)
11-14 years (n = 75)
15-18 years (n = 116)
Total
Intraoperative events (n = 11)
Stone migration1 (0.4)1 (0.4)1 (0.4)3 (1.2)
Retrograde access failure2 (0.8)2 (0.8)
Bleeding1 (0.4)1 (0.4)
Ureteral perforation1 (0.4)1 (0.4)1 (0.4)3 (1.2)
Conversion to open surgery1 (0.4)1 (0.4)
Mucosal injury1 (0.4)1 (0.4)
Subtotal intraoperative7 (2.8)1 (0.4)2 (0.8)1 (0.4)11 (4.4)
Postoperative events (n = 20)
Residual fragments ≥ 5 mm (ESWL performed)7 (2.8)4 (1.6)5 (2.0)4 (1.6)20 (8.0)
Total complications14 (5.6)5 (2.0)7 (2.8)5 (2.0)31 (12.4)
Table 7 Postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (n = 21)
Clavien-Dindo grade
Event
n (%)
Anesthesia/management
IIIaESWL for residual fragments20 (8.0)Sedation/ataralgesia
IIIbUreteral reimplantation (open conversion)1 (0.4)General anesthesia
Total21 (8.4)