BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2025; 14(4): 108878
Published online Dec 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i4.108878
Table 1 The predictors of damage in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Parameter
Se
Sp
OR (95%CI)
RR (95%CI)
P value
Polyarthricular JIA category35.086.53.5 (1.3-9.0)1.6 (1.2-2.2)0.017
ANA positivity45.075.02.5 (1.1-5.5)1.5 (1.1-2.1)0.027
Arthritis of ≥ 5 joints at onset25.090.43.1 (1.1-9.3)1.5 (1.1-2.1)0.034
Active joints > 8 at the study inclusion55.076.94.1 (1.8-9.3)1.8 (1.3-2.6)< 0.001
Parental/patient VAS > 6 cm53.371.22.8 (1.3-6.2)3.2 (1.6-6.2)0.009
MDVAS > 6 cm88.350.07.6 (2.9-19.7)3.2 (1.6-6.2)< 0.001
JADAS71 > 17.7 points81.748.14.1 (1.8-9.7)2.1 (1.3-3.6)0.001
CHAQ > 0 points68.359.63.2 (1.5-6.9)1.7 (1.2-2.6)0.003
Ankylosis, confirmed by X-ray29.897.919.5 (2.4-155.8)2.2 (1.7-3.0)0.008
MRI-confirmed erosions49.090.912.5 (3.8-40.9)2.2 (1.6-3.1)< 0.001
Table 2 The final predictors of damage development (multiple regression analysis data)
Predictor
Β
SE
P value
Intercept0.1080.0840.200
Active joints > 8 at the study inclusion0.1910.0930.044
MDVAS > 6 cm0.3180.1020.003
MRI-confirmed erosions0.3550.097< 0.001
Table 3 Baseline comparison of the studied population, with and without damage, n (%)
Parameter
JADI (+ ve), n = 60
JADI (- ve), n = 52
P value
Age at study inclusion, years, IQR11.6 (7.5-15.4)13.1 (9-16.1)0.244
Sex, females36 (60.0)29 (55.7)0.651
JIA category, according to the ILAR[3]
Oligoarthritis23 (38.0)19 (36.5)0.845
Polyarthritis21 (35.0)7 (13.5)0.017
Psoriatic arthritis4 (7.0)4 (8.0)0.834
Enthesitis-related arthritis12 (20.0)22 (42.0)0.019
JIA onset age, years, IQR8.7 (3-12)10.1 (6.9-13.1)0.079
Diagnosis delay, moths, IQR3.9 (1-12)4 (1.5-10)0.560
JIA duration, years, IQR2.3 (0.8-4.5)1.6 (0.9-3.2)0.360
Time before non-biologic DMARDs, months, IQR5 (2-14)6 (2.2-23)0.491
ANA positivity (> 1:320)27 (45.0)13 (25.0)0.027
RF-positivity6 (10.0)2 (3.8)0.207
ACCP-positivity6 (10.0)1 (1.9)0.078
Enthesitis6 (10.0)14 (26.9)0.019
Uveitis6 (10.0)4 (7.7)0.669
Arthritis of ≥ 5 joints at onset15 (25.0)5 (9.6)0.034
Number of past nbDMARDs
No3 (5.0)5 (9.6)0.345
One47 (78.3)37 (71.2)0.512
Two10 (16.7)9 (17.3)0.872
Three0 (0)1 (1.9)0.943
No episodes of nbDMARDs therapy interruption45 (75.0)41 (78.8)0.631
Past corticosteroid treatment11 (18.3)6 (11.5)0.314
Past corticosteroid treatment duration--0.622
< 3 months8 (13.3)5 (9.6)-
≥ 3 months3 (5.0)1 (1.9)-
Corticosteroid treatment duration, IQR1 (0.3-6)1.8 (0.2-2.6)0.802
Remission duration ≥ 6 months in the past5 (8.3)5 (9.6)0.812
Active joints, IQR9 (6-17.5)6 (4-8)< 0.001
Swollen joints, IQR8 (6-15)5 (3-7.5)< 0.001
Painful joints, IQR8 (5.5-15)6 (3.5-8)0.001
Joints with limited ROM, IQR3 (2-4.5)2 (1.5-2)< 0.001
Parental/patient VAS (cm), IQR7 (5-7)2 (1.5-2)0.045
MDVAS (cm), IQR7 (7-8)6 (4-8)< 0.001
ESR (mm/hour), IQR10 (5-24)11 (5.5-19)0.896
С-reactive protein (mg/L), IQR1.8 (0.3-10.5)1.5 (0.2-5.6)0.512
JADAS71, IQR23.5 (20-34.2)19.1 (15-25)< 0.001
CHAQ, IQR0.4 (0-0.8)0 (0-0.3)0.003
X-ray changes47/60 (78.3)32/52 (61.5)-
Early signs25/47 (53.2)29/47 (90.6)0.002
Erosions8/47 (17.0)2/47 (6.3)0.286
Ankylosis14/47 (29.8)1/47 (3.1)0.008
MRI-changes51/60 (85.0)44/52 (84,6)< 0.001
Bone marrow edema26/51 (51.0)40/44 (90.9)-
Erosions25/51 (49.0)4/44 (9.1)-
Table 4 Comparative analysis of clinical parameters of patients whose juvenile arthritis damage index improved vs remained unchanged/deteriorated on biological disease-modified antirheumatic drugs therapy (end of study), n (%)
Parameter
Improved JADI, n = 41
Non-improved JADI, n = 19
P value
Presence of the JADI–A at the baseline38 (92.7)14 (73.7)0.044
Baseline JADI-A, IQR2 (1-5)1 (0-2)0.014
Patients with uveitis2 (4.9)4 (21.1)0.05
Treatment with nbDMARDs at the EOS40 (97.6)14 (73.7)0.004
Stable nbDMARD treatment during the study39 (95.1)12 (63.2)0.001
Stable bDMARD treatment during the study36 (87.8)12 (63.2)0.03
Bone osteonecrosis (JADI-E)3 (7.3)6 (31.6)0.014
Eye damage (JADI-E)0 (0)2 (10.5)0.034
MRI-confirmed bone erosions, n/n performed (%)14/37 (37.8)11/15 (73.3)0.021
bDMARD treatment:0.297
Etanercept19 (46.3)8 (42.1)
Golimumab2 (4.9)3 (15.8)
Adalimumab14 (34.1)8 (42.1)
Tofacitinib4 (9.8)0 (0)
Secukinumab2 (4.9)0 (0)
Table 5 Comparative analysis of clinical parameters of patients whose JADI-A improved vs remained unchanged/deteriorated on biologic disease-modified antirheumatic drugs therapy (end of study), n (%)
Parameter
Improved JADI-A, n = 38
Non-improved JADI-A, n = 14
P value
Baseline JADI-A, IQR2 (1-6)1.5 (1-2)0.096
Patients with uveitis2 (5.3)2 (14.3)0.278
Treatment with nbDMARDs at the EOS38 (100)9 (64.3)0.001
Stable nbDMARD treatment during the study37 (97.4)8 (57.1)0.001
Stable bDMARD treatment during the study33 (86.8)9 (64.3)0.067
Bone osteonecrosis (JADI-E)2 (5.3)3 (21.4)0.079
MRI-confirmed bone erosions13/35 (37.1)8/12 (66.7)0.075
bDMARD treatment0.249
Etanercept17 (44.7)5 (35.7)
Golimumab2 (5.3)3 (21.4)
Adalimumab13 (34.2)6 (42.8)
Tofacitinib4 (10.5)0 (0)
Secukinumab2 (5.3)0 (0)
Table 6 Predictors of articular damage improvement (multiple regression analysis data), n (%)
Predictor
Β
SE
P value
Intercept-0.0260.1980.896
Treatment with nbDMARDs at the EOS0.3430.1190.006
Stable bDMARD treatment during the study0.2490.1190.042