Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2025; 14(4): 107127
Published online Dec 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i4.107127
Published online Dec 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i4.107127
Table 1 Currently available continuous glucose monitoring systems used in children in the United States
| Company | Dexcom, Inc | Abbott laboratories | Medtronic | Senseonics |
| Product | Dexcom G6 | FreeStyle Libre 2 | Guardian connect | Eversense |
| Approved age of use (years) | ≥ 2 | ≥ 4 | ≥ 14 | ≥ 18 |
| Sensor location | Abdomen | Upper arm | Abdomen or upper arm | Upper arm |
| Communication technique | Cloud-based wireless system | Bluetooth with smartphone. Uploads to cloud with app | Bluetooth to smartphone. Uploads to cloud | Bluetooth to smartphone. Cloud storage |
| Year of FDA approval | 2018 | 2020 | 2018 | 2018 |
| Special features | Glucose streaming to smartphone, customizable alarms, compatible with smartwatches | 14-day wear, real-time alarms. Option for high and low glucose alerts | Predictive alerts (60 minutes before reaching low/high levels, real-time glucose values, predictive alerts, critical alerts customizable alerts) | Long wear sensor (up to 90 days in United States), real-time glucose data, alerts and alarms signaled with on-body vibration, customizable alarms through app |
| Ability to integrate with insulin pump | Yes | Some | Yes | Yes |
| Smartphone requirement | Dexcom Clarity | LibreView | Carelink | Eversense data management system pro |
| Pharmacologic interferences | Acetaminophen, hydroxyurea | Vitamin C | Acetaminophen | Acetaminophen, mannitol or sorbitol |
| Contraindications | MRI, X ray, diathermy | MRI, X ray, diathermy | MRI, X ray, diathermy | MRI, diathermy, lithotripsy |
| Device classification | Real-time glucose display | Intermittent scanned | Real-time glucose display | Implant |
| EHR compatibility potential | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Table 2 Preprocedural checklist recommendations for type 1 diabetes pediatric surgical patients
| Preprocedural visit checklist for pediatric T1D with CGMS | |
| Preop checklist for T1D patient as obtained by endocrinologist: | |
| 1 | Verify type of insulin pump, CGM device and manufacturer |
| 2 | Verify patients’ insulin type and basal rate settings |
| 3 | Draw HbA1c and electrolyte levels |
| 4 | Verify insulin: Carbohydrate ratio, correction factor |
| 5 | Check for interference of operative site with CGMS equipment |
| 6 | Ensure patient has new sensor, working battery, and pump supplies on day of surgery |
Table 3 Summary of International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes recommendations
| ISPAD 2022 clinical practice guidelines for management of children with diabetes having surgery |
| Glycemic goals for surgery |
| BG should be maintained between 90-180 mg/dL |
| Prevent perioperative hypoglycemia and DKA |
| Assessment of pediatric T1D prior to surgery/or anesthesia |
| Preoperative endocrine consultation: Thorough assessment of glycemia, assess for ketones (blood and urine) formalize perioperative glycemic plan |
| Preoperative care |
| If patient expected to receive GA, can be admitted to hospital or same-day clinic |
| Insulin is required, even in fasting state, to avoid DKA |
| POC BG should be checked and recorded every hour |
| Intraoperative care |
| Monitor POC BG every hour and continue in recovery |
| CGM can be continued intraoperatively but validated with POC BG levels |
| Postoperative care |
| Give short or rapid acting insulin (based upon insulin: Carbohydrate ratio or correction factor) |
| More frequent CGM/POC BG levels recommended for 24-48 hours after surgery due to surgical stressors |
| Validate CGM readings after exposure to anesthetic agents with POC BG |
| Target BG levels in postoperative period between 140-180 mg/dL |
Table 4 Common medication interferences on continuous glucose monitor readings
| Medication | Effect on continuous glucose monitor reading |
| Acetaminophen | ↑ |
| Aspirin | ↓ |
| Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) | ↓ |
| Lisinopril | ↑ or ↓ |
| Losartan | ↑ or ↓ |
| Atenolol | ↑ or ↓ |
| Albuterol | ↑ or ↓ |
| Hydroxyurea | ↑ or ↓ |
Table 5 Summary of the health level 7 fast healthcare interoperability resource protocol criteria
| HL7 FHIR protocol development criteria | |
| 1 | Establishing a platform that can connect the technologies between different IT systems |
| 2 | Ensure data security for HIPPA regulations while maintaining highest level of patient privacy |
| 3 | Adopt or establish protocols which standardize data for ease of interpretation by EHR |
| 4 | Application programming interfaces are needed to facilitate communication between CGM cloud-based repository and the hospital EHR |
| 5 | Ensure data accuracy with data mapping and integration |
| 6 | User interface adjustments-allows personnel to follow data trends and gain insights into patient care specifics |
| 7 | Training and support-ongoing education of healthcare providers on how to interpret and use blood glucose data |
Table 6 Machine learning applications commonly used in continuous glucose monitors
| AI technique | Predictive modeling | Pattern recognition | Event prediction |
| Methodology | (1) Supervised learning: Use of labeled data in training models to predict future glucose levels (Hemoglobin A1c); (2) Case based reasoning: Adapts solutions based on previous data history | Unsupervised learning: Use of unlabeled data in training models used to identify patterns and relationships in the data | Supervised learning: Uses datasets with specific outcomes (hypo and hyperglycemia) for event prediction |
| Algorithms used | (1) Linear regression, decision trees, random forests, neural networks; (2) Similarity measures, nearest neighbor | k-means clustering, isolation forests | support vector machines, logistic regression and deep learning (require more resources for efficiency) |
| Diabetic applications | Strength: Provides early alerts for high and low glucose readings. Weakness: Requires copious data points for accuracy | Strength: Detects glucose patterns and atypical readings. Weakness: Clustering can require interpretation, can result in false + especially when readings are varied | Strength: Prompts critical alerts in hypoglycemia. Weakness: May produce false positive alarms |
| Examples in diabetic care | Predictive modeling, self-management tools, retinal screening | Decision support, prediction models, self-management tools, retinal screening | Predictive modeling, patient self-management tools, retinal screening |
- Citation: Doherty T, Kelley A, Kim E, Salik I. Use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in pediatric patients in the perioperative environment: Challenges and machine learning opportunities. World J Clin Pediatr 2025; 14(4): 107127
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v14/i4/107127.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v14.i4.107127
