Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2025; 16(11): 111857
Published online Nov 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.111857
Published online Nov 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.111857
Table 1 Comparison of pre- and post-revision functional outcomes, mean ± SD
| Variable | Pre-revision | Post-revision | N | P value |
| KSS | 39.43 ± 6.18 | 78.91 ± 6.17 | 118 | < 0.001 |
| Pain VAS | 7.99 ± 1.37 | 1.42 ± 1.17 | 118 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Association between gender and etiology of total knee arthroplasty failure, n (%)
| Gender | Infection | Aseptic loosening | Implant wear and tear | Total | P value |
| Male | 33 (50.8) | 27 (41.5) | 5 (7.7) | 65 | 0.391 |
| Female | 21 (39.6) | 25 (47.2) | 7 (13.2) | 53 | |
| Total | 54 (45.8) | 52 (44.1) | 12 (10.2) | 118 |
Table 3 Association between type of revision surgery and mobility improvement, n (%)
| Type of revision | Improved | Not improved | Total | P value |
| Single-stage | 32 (51.6) | 30 (48.4) | 62 | 0.574 |
| Two-stage | 26 (46.4) | 30 (53.6) | 56 | |
| Total | 58 (49.2) | 60 (50.8) | 118 |
Table 4 Comparison of age, body mass index, and time since primary total knee arthroplasty between mobility improvement groups
| Variable | Mobility improved (n = 58) | Mobility not improved (n = 60) | P value |
| Age (years) | 60.09 ± 7.01 | 61.90 ± 7.09 | 0.165 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.96 ± 3.76 | 28.19 ± 4.08 | 0.753 |
| Time since primary TKA (years) | 7.52 ± 4.40 | 7.72 ± 4.26 | 0.803 |
- Citation: Hassan SMT, Hussain S, Wasim S, Raza T, Khan N, Abidi SAR, Anwar K, Asim HS, Shenawa E. Etiology of total knee arthroplasty failure and functional outcome of revision knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 111857
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i11/111857.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.111857
