BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2025; 16(11): 111857
Published online Nov 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.111857
Table 1 Comparison of pre- and post-revision functional outcomes, mean ± SD
Variable
Pre-revision
Post-revision
N
P value
KSS39.43 ± 6.1878.91 ± 6.17118< 0.001
Pain VAS7.99 ± 1.371.42 ± 1.17118< 0.001
Table 2 Association between gender and etiology of total knee arthroplasty failure, n (%)
Gender
Infection
Aseptic loosening
Implant wear and tear
Total
P value
Male33 (50.8)27 (41.5)5 (7.7)650.391
Female21 (39.6)25 (47.2)7 (13.2)53
Total54 (45.8)52 (44.1)12 (10.2)118
Table 3 Association between type of revision surgery and mobility improvement, n (%)
Type of revision
Improved
Not improved
Total
P value
Single-stage32 (51.6)30 (48.4)620.574
Two-stage26 (46.4)30 (53.6)56
Total58 (49.2)60 (50.8)118
Table 4 Comparison of age, body mass index, and time since primary total knee arthroplasty between mobility improvement groups
Variable
Mobility improved (n = 58)
Mobility not improved (n = 60)
P value
Age (years)60.09 ± 7.0161.90 ± 7.090.165
BMI (kg/m2)27.96 ± 3.7628.19 ± 4.080.753
Time since primary TKA (years)7.52 ± 4.407.72 ± 4.260.803