Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 109196
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.109196
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.109196
Table 1 Pre- and post-match baseline demographic characteristics
| Pre-match | Post-match | |||||
| Traditional (n = 553) | High efficiency (n = 838) | SD | Traditional (n = 429) | High efficiency (n = 429) | SD | |
| Female, n (%) | 342 (63.9) | 619 (73.9) | 0.27 | 289 (67.4) | 289 (67.4) | 0 |
| Age (year), mean (SD) | 52.3 (15.4) | 55.9 (14.1) | 0.26 | 54.2 (14.7) | 53.9 (14.9) | 0.02 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 29.5 (6.5) | 28.0 (5.6) | 0.26 | 29.2 (6.3) | 28.3 (5.7) | 0.16 |
| ASA I and II, n (%) | 380 (68.7) | 622 (74.2) | 0.13 | 294 (69.9) | 300 (68.5) | 0.03 |
| Surgery below ankle, n (%) | 317 (57.3) | 718 (85.7) | 0.81 | 314 (73.2) | 314 (73.2) | 0 |
Table 2 Distribution of surgical procedures before and after matching, n (%)
| Pre-match | Post-match | |||
| Traditional (n = 553) | High efficiency (n = 838) | Traditional (n = 429) | High efficiency (n = 429) | |
| Below ankle | 318 (57.5) | 718 (85.6) | 314 (73.2) | 314 (73.2) |
| Soft tissue excision | 14 (2.5) | 48 (5.7) | 14 | 20 |
| Toe or foot hardware removal | 26 (4.7) | 69 (8.2) | 26 | 30 |
| Toe or foot arthrodesis | 147 (26.6) | 256 (30.5) | 145 | 108 |
| Toe open reduction | 17 (3.1) | 39 (4.7) | 17 | 21 |
| Toe or foot osteotomy | 81 (14.6) | 288 (34.4) | 81 | 127 |
| Foot tendon repair | 33 (6.0) | 18 (2.1) | 31 | 8 |
| At or above ankle | 235 (42.5) | 120 (14.3) | 115 (26.8) | 115 (26.8) |
| Ankle arthroscopy | 20 (3.6) | 6 (0.8) | 8 | 6 |
| Ankle or tibial hardware removal | 46 (8.3) | 100 (11.9) | 23 | 95 |
| Ankle arthrodesis | 25 (4.5) | 0 (0) | 10 | 0 |
| Ankle ligament repair | 8 (1.4) | 1 (0.1) | 4 | 1 |
| Ankle or tibial osteotomy | 25 (4.5) | 2 (0.2) | 11 | 2 |
| Ankle open reduction | 111 (20.0) | 11 (1.3) | 59 | 11 |
Table 3 Pre- and post-match outcomes
| Pre-match1 | Post-match2 | Mean difference or odds ratio3 (95%CI) | P value | E value (5%CL) | |||
| Traditional (n = 553) | High efficiency (n = 838) | Traditional (n = 429) | High efficiency (n = 429) | ||||
| Total recovery time (minute), median [IQR] | 133 [102-169] | 68 [51-90] | 133 [100-171] | 67 [49-88] | -63 (-69 to -57) | < 0.001a | 6.2 |
| Preoperative time (minute), median [IQR] | 40 [32-54] | 42 [31-58] | 39 [32-52] | 41 [31-59] | -2 (-4 to 1) | 0.17 | |
| Operating time (minute), median [IQR] | 59 [43-76] | 40 [27-52] | 59 [43-77] | 39 [27-51] | -20 (-23 to -17) | < 0.001a | 4.2 |
| Total length of stay (minute), median [IQR] | 324 [279-380] | 238 [203-275] | 320 [275-378] | 236 [205-273] | -84 (-92 to -75) | < 0.001a | 5.7 |
| Phase 1 recovery utilization, n/total, n (%) | 458/553 (82.8) | 45/838 (5.4) | 403 (93.4) | 26 (6.1) | 0.016 (0.010-0.026) | < 0.001a | 15.3 |
| Opioid utilization, n/total, n (%) | 175/553 (31.6) | 87/745 (11.7) | 139 (32.4) | 45 (10.5) | 0.24 (0.17-0.36) | < 0.001a | 3.5 |
Table 4 Pre- and post-match baseline demographic characteristics in the below ankle or at and above ankle surgery subgroup
| Pre-match | Post-match | |||||
| Traditional | High efficiency | SD | Traditional | High efficiency | SD | |
| Below ankle | n = 317 | n = 718 | n = 312 | n = 312 | ||
| Female, n (%) | 224 (70.1) | 545 (75.9) | 0.12 | 220 (70.5) | 230 (73.7) | 0.07 |
| Age (year), mean (SD) | 56.9 (13.4) | 57.5 (13.1) | 0.04 | 56.8 (13.5) | 57.3 (12.9) | 0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 29.7 (6.5) | 28.0 (5.6) | 0.30 | 29.3 (6.0) | 28.9 (6.1) | 0.07 |
| ASA I and II, n (%) | 198 (62.4) | 522 (72.7) | 0.23 | 198 (63.5) | 200 (64.1) | 0.04 |
| Above ankle | n = 236 | n = 120 | n = 114 | n = 114 | ||
| Female, n (%) | 118 (50.0) | 74 (61.7) | 0.24 | 68 (59.6) | 70 (61.4) | 0.04 |
| Age (year), mean (SD) | 46.1 (15.8) | 46.5 (16.6) | 0.03 | 45.6 (16.2) | 45.8 (16.2) | 0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 29.2 (6.4) | 28.4 (5.7) | 0.15 | 28.8 (6.1) | 28.6 (5.6) | 0.03 |
| ASA I and II, n (%) | 182 (77.1) | 100 (83.3) | 0.17 | 98 (86.0) | 96 (84.2) | 0.05 |
Table 5 Post-matched surgical procedures between high efficiency and traditional groups, n (%)
| Traditional | High efficiency | |
| Below ankle | n = 312 | n = 312 |
| Soft tissue excision | 14 (4.5) | 15 (4.8) |
| Toe or foot hardware removal | 26 (8.3) | 27 (8.7) |
| Toe or foot arthrodesis | 141 (45.2) | 130 (41.2) |
| Toe or foot open reduction | 17 (5.4) | 24 (7.7) |
| Toe or foot osteotomy | 81 (26.0) | 111 (35.6) |
| Foot tendon repair | 33 (10.6) | 5 (1.6) |
| At or above ankle | n = 116 | n = 116 |
| Ankle arthroscopy | 10 (8.6) | 6 (5.2) |
| Ankle or tibial hardware removal | 19 (16.4) | 96 (82.8) |
| Ankle arthrodesis | 14 (12.1) | 0 (0) |
| Ankle ligament repair | 3 (2.6) | 1 (0.9) |
| Ankle or tibial osteotomy | 14 (12.1) | 2 (1.7) |
| Ankle open reduction | 56 (48.3) | 11 (9.5) |
Table 6 Measured outcomes in pre- and post-matched samples with difference in mean and odds ratios in below ankle procedures
| Pre-match1 | Post-match2 | Mean difference (95%CI) | P value3 | E value (5%CL) | |||
| Traditional (n = 317) | High efficiency | Traditional (n = 312) | High efficiency | ||||
| Total recovery time (minute), median [IQR] | 137 [101-173] | 69 [51-92] | 137 [101-173] | 68 [51-92] | -63 [-70 to -56] | < 0.001a | 5.8 |
| Preoperative time (minute), median [IQR] | 39 [32-51] | 42 [31-58] | 40 [32-51] | 42 [33-56] | -2 [-5 to 1] | 0.12 | 3.5 |
| Operating time (minute), median [IQR] | 59 [41-77] | 41 [28-52] | 59 [41-77] | 41 [28-54] | -17 [-20 to -13] | < 0.001a | |
| Total length of stay (minute), median [IQR] | 321 [278-378] | 240 [204-275] | 321 [278-378] | 242 [203-271] | -84 [-94 to -74] | < 0.001a | 5.8 |
| Phase 1 recovery utilization, n (%) | 249 (78.5) | 32 (4.5) | 245 (78.5) | 15 (4.8) | 0.014 (0.007-0.025) | < 0.001a | 16.4 |
| Opioid utilization, n (%) | 96 (30.2) | 71 (9.9) | 96 (30.8) | 30 (9.6) | 0.24 (0.15-0.38) | < 0.001a | 3.5 |
Table 7 Measured outcomes in pre- and post-matched samples with difference in mean in above ankle procedures
| Pre-match1 | Post-match2 | Mean difference (95%CI) | P value | E value (5%CL) | |||
| Traditional (n = 235) | High efficiency | Traditional (n = 116) | High efficiency | ||||
| Total recovery time (minute), median [IQR] | 130 [103-166] | 60 [48-82] | 131 [103-166] | 60 [48-81] | -67 (-77 to -56) | < 0.001 | 7.9 (5.9) |
| Preoperative time (minute), median [IQR] | 42 [32-59] | 42 [31-59] | 41 [33-59] | 41 [31-60] | 0 (-5 to 5) | 0.97 | 4.6 (3.4) |
| Operating time (minute), median [IQR] | 59 [46-73] | 34 [26-45] | 58 [44-78] | 35 [27-46] | -22 (-27 to -17) | < 0.001 | |
| Total length of stay (minute), median [IQR] | 330 [281-383] | 225 [200-274] | 327 [286-378] | 226 [200-274] | -101 (-117 to -82) | < 0.001 | 7.6 (5.6) |
Table 8 Measured outcomes in pre- and post-matched samples with difference in odds ratios in above ankle procedures, n (%)
| Recovery events | Traditional | High efficiency | Traditional | High efficiency | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value1 | E value (5%CL) |
| Phase 1 recovery utilization, n/total | 209 (88.9) | 13 (10.8) | 98 (84.5) | 12 (10.3) | 0.022 (0.009-0.049) | < 0.001a | 13.0 (8.5) |
| Opioid utilization, n/total | 79 (33.6) | 16 (13.3) | 44 (37.9) | 16 (13.8) | 0.26 (0.13-0.52) | < 0.001a | 3.3 (2.1) |
- Citation: Lin C, Nagdev T, Zhu DA, Nair GS, Cheng S, Kumar K. High efficiency pathway for lower limb orthopedic surgery: A matched historic cohort study. World J Orthop 2025; 16(10): 109196
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i10/109196.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.109196
