Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 116076
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116076
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116076
Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart.
CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2 Forest plots showing results of meta-analysis for lateral plateau depression and lateral plateau widening computed tomography parameters.
A: Lateral plateau depression in lateral meniscus injuries; B: Lateral plateau depression in medial meniscus injuries; C: Lateral plateau depression in posterior cruciate ligament injuries; D: Lateral plateau widening in lateral meniscus injuries. LPD: Lateral plateau depression; LM: Lateral meniscus; CI: Confidence interval; MM: Medial meniscus; PCL: Posterior cruciate ligament; LPW: Lateral plateau widening.
Figure 3 Forest plots showing results of meta-analysis for medial plateau depression computed tomography parameter.
A: Medial plateau depression in lateral meniscus injuries; B: Medial plateau depression in medial meniscus injuries; C: Medial plateau depression in posterior cruciate ligament injuries. MPD: Medial plateau depression; LM: Lateral meniscus; CI: Confidence interval; MM: Medial meniscus; PCL: Posterior cruciate ligament.
Figure 4 Funnel plot for publications that reported on lateral plateau depression as a predictor of lateral meniscus injury.
Egger’s regression test showed no statistically significant funnel plot asymmetry (P = 0.093), indicating a low likelihood of publication bias.
- Citation: Hassan AAA, Khalifa AA, Villalon AR, Hauri D, Zhu TY. Predictive value of preoperative computed tomography parameters for meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries in tibial plateau fractures: Meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2026; 17(4): 116076
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i4/116076.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116076
