BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 113710
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.113710
From subtle breaks to missed diagnoses: Real-world evaluation of an artificial intelligence fracture detection tool
Sari Wathiq Al Hajaj, Khaled Soliman, Mahira Zafar, Callum Garnham, Dawod Al Hajaj, Omar Elshafie, Ahmad Alsswah, Mohammed H Elwan
Sari Wathiq Al Hajaj, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering NN16 8UZ, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Khaled Soliman, Mahira Zafar, Callum Garnham, Omar Elshafie, Ahmad Alsswah, Mohammed H Elwan, Emergency Medicine, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering NN16 8UZ, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Dawod Al Hajaj, Altinbaş University, Istanbul 34360, Türkiye
Co-first authors: Sari Wathiq Al Hajaj and Khaled Soliman.
Author contributions: Al Hajaj SW and Soliman K study design and conceptualization; Zafar M, Garnham C and Al Hajaj D data collection and curation; Elshafie O, Alsswah A statistical analysis and data validation; Elwan MH, Al Hajaj SW interpretation of findings and drafting of the manuscript. All authors critical revision of the manuscript, approval of the final version, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Al Hajaj SW and Soliman K contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
Institutional review board statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Informed consent statement: As this was a retrospective study using anonymised radiology data with no patient identifiers collected, informed consent was not required.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The anonymised dataset underlying this article is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Corresponding author: Sari Wathiq Al Hajaj, MD, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Kettering General Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering NN16 8UZ, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom. sarialhajaj95@gmail.com
Received: September 1, 2025
Revised: October 2, 2025
Accepted: January 14, 2026
Published online: April 18, 2026
Processing time: 221 Days and 10.1 Hours
Core Tip

Core Tip: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilised in musculoskeletal imaging; however, its clinical utility in fracture detection remains a subject of debate. In this retrospective study aimed at assessing diagnostic accuracy, we evaluated an AI-based fracture detection system in comparison with radiologist reports across over 2000 limb radiographs. The AI demonstrated high accuracy but failed to identify approximately 10% of fractures, primarily subtle or minimally displaced injuries, and frequently over diagnosed old or degenerative changes. False negatives posed a greater clinical risk than false positives, underscoring the importance of implementing AI as a triage and decision-support tool rather than a substitute for radiologists.