BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2026; 17(3): 115537
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.115537
Significant quality of life improvement following total knee replacement for end-stage osteoarthritis: Retrospective cohort study
Mohammed H Abushal, Osama M Embaby, Mahmoud Mersal, Emran Badghish, Mohamed Elalfy
Mohammed H Abushal, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
Osama M Embaby, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham B66 2QT, United Kingdom
Mahmoud Mersal, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, United Kingdom
Emran Badghish, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 67714, Saudi Arabia
Mohamed Elalfy, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
Co-first authors: Mohammed H Abushal and Osama M Embaby.
Author contributions: Abushal MH and Embaby OM designed the study concept and methodology, they contributed equally to this article, they are the co-first authors of this manuscript; Abushal MH, Embaby OM, and Mersal M conducted the clinical investigation and data collection; Embaby OM and Mersal M performed data curation, prepared original manuscript draft; Abushal MH, Embaby OM, Mersal M, Badghish E, and Elalfy M subsequently reviewed and edited; Abushal MH and Elalfy M provided supervision; and all authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, approval No. 704.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of de-identified patient data.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Corresponding author: Mohammed H Abushal, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Tabuk, Duba Road, University City, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia. mabushal@ut.edu.sa
Received: October 20, 2025
Revised: November 4, 2025
Accepted: December 17, 2025
Published online: March 18, 2026
Processing time: 148 Days and 10 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a cornerstone intervention for advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet real-world data directly comparing its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) against non-surgical management using standardized patient-reported outcome measures remains limited, particularly from the Middle East. This study addresses this gap by evaluating HRQoL changes in a Saudi Arabian cohort.

AIM

To compare the change in HRQoL, measured by the EuroQol five-dimension, five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L) instrument, between patients undergoing TKR and those receiving conservative treatment for severe knee OA.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary orthopedic center in Saudi Arabia, analyzing data from patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade III-IV knee OA between January 2018 and December 2022. This study is reported following the STROBE guidelines. Patients were allocated into two groups: The TKR group (n = 480) and the conservative management group (n = 400). The primary outcome was the change in the EQ-5D-5 L index score from baseline to one-year post-intervention. Statistical analyses included paired and independent t-tests, with a P value < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 880 patients were included in the final analysis. The TKR group demonstrated a substantial and clinically significant improvement in mean EQ-5D-5 L scores, from 0.35 ± 0.08 at baseline to 0.76 ± 0.09 at one year (mean change: +0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.43; P < 0.001). This improvement far exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 0.07-0.12. In contrast, the conservative management group showed a minimal, non-significant improvement from 0.36 ± 0.07 to 0.42 ± 0.08 (mean change: +0.06; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.08; P = 0.07), which did not meet the minimal clinically important difference. The between-group difference in HRQoL improvement was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides strong evidence that TKR leads to substantial and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL for patients with severe knee OA, whereas conservative management offers limited benefits. These findings reinforce the effectiveness of TKR in the management of advanced OA, support timely surgical referral, and validate the use of the EQ-5D-5 L as a robust patient-reported outcome measure in this patient population.

Keywords: Total knee replacement; Knee osteoarthritis; Health-related quality of life; Patient-reported outcome measures; Conservative management; Retrospective cohort study

Core Tip: Total knee replacement is a highly effective procedure for improving the quality of life in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis. This retrospective cohort study from a major Saudi Arabian orthopedic center provides strong evidence that surgical intervention offers substantial and clinically meaningful benefits over conservative management, as measured by the EuroQol five-dimension, five-level questionnaire patient-reported outcome measure. These findings support prioritizing timely surgical referrals for eligible candidates to maximize improvements in health-related quality of life.