Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 10, 2017; 8(3): 266-272
Published online Jun 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.266
Published online Jun 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.266
Table 1 Quality assessment of selected randomized clinical trials evaluated by Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool (Risk of bias per study)
Criteria | Langer | Portier | Nordlinger | Ychou | Primrose |
Random sequence generation | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Allocation concealments | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Blinding of participants and personnel1 | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low |
Blinding of outcome assessment1,2 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Incomplete outcome data | Unclear | Low | Low | Unclear | Low |
Selective reporting | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Other bias | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Table 2 Comparative distribution of accessible baseline characteristics of patients among studies included in the systematic review
Characteristics | Langer n = 107 (%) | Portier n = 171 (%) | Nordlinger n = 364 (%) | Ychou n = 306 (%) | Primrose1n = 257 (%) | |||||
Surg n = 55 | S + C n = 52 | Surg n = 85 | S + C n = 86 | Surg n = 182 | S + C n = 182 | S + 5-FU n = 153 | S + FOLFIRI n = 153 | S + C n = 128 | S + C + Cetuximab n = 129 | |
Median age | 60 | 63.5 | 63 | 63 | 62 | 64 | 61 | 63 | 64 | 63 |
Gender (male) | 65.4 | 65.4 | 62.4 | 53.5 | 63 | 70 | 65.4 | 58.8 | 63 | 71 |
Primary site (rectum) | 30.9 | 26.9 | 40 | 40.7 | 37 | 46 | 26.1 | 28.8 | - | - |
DFI ≤ 12 mo | 38.2 | 34.6 | 74.1 | 74.4 | 24 | 27 | 62.3 | 61.4 | - | - |
Node-positive primary | 45.4 | 50 | 50.6 | 44.3 | 57 | 55 | - | - | - | - |
No. of lesions > 1 | 32.7 | 36.5 | 30.1 | 31.4 | 52 | 51 | 35.9 | 36 | - | - |
Largest met ≥ 5 cm | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Chemotherapy | 5-FU | 5-FU | FOLFOX | 5 –FU | FOLFIRI | 5-FU + OX or 5-FU + Cap or FOLFIRI | 5-FU + OX or 5-FU + Cap or FOLFIRI or + Cetuximab |
Table 3 Comparison of original planned and analyzed design of randomized clinical trials with patients who underwent surgery and additional chemotherapy for initially resectable colorectal liver metastases
Studies | Initial design | No. of patients | Chemotherapy | % | Median FU | RFS | OS | ||||||||||
by author | Primary endpoint | Planned HR | Type of analyses | Plan-ned | Acc-rued | ITT enrolled | PP (weight) | Regimen | Std Arm | Exp Arm | Resected | Std Arm | Exp Arm | Std Arm | Exp Arm | Std Arm | Exp Arm |
Langer | OS | NR | PP | NR | 129 | 129 | 107 (9) | Adj | 0 | 5-FU × 6 | 100% | NR | NR | 20 | 39 | 43 median | 53 median |
Portier | RFS | 20% abs dif 2 yr1 | ITT | 200 | 173 | 171 | 171 (15) | Adj | 0 | 5-FU × 6 | 100% | 87.4 | 87.4 | 17.6 | 24.4 | 46.4 median | 62.1 median |
Nord-linger | RFS | 0.714 | Both | NR | 364 | 364 | 342 (29) | Periop | 0 | FOLFOX × 12 | 93% | 8.7 yr | 8.7 yr | 20 | 12.5 | 54.3 | 61.3 |
Ychou | RFS | NR | PP | 420 | 321 | 321 | 306 (26) | Adj | 1 5FU | FOLFIRI × 6 | 100% | 42.4 | 41.7 | 21.6 | 24.7 | 72% at 3-yr | 73% at 3-yr |
Pri-mrose | RFS | 0.68 | ITT | 268 | 272 | 257 | 236 (20) | Periop | FOL-FOX | Cetux + FOLFOX (70%) | 85% (Chemo) | 21.1 | 19.8 | 14.1 | 20.5 | 39.1 | NR |
82% (Cetux) |
Table 4 Comparison of original hazard ratio and those from linear regression formula
Studies (by author) | n total (weight %) | RFS | OS | Assumption OS HR | ||||
HR | 95%CI | HR | 95%CI | |||||
Langer | 107 (9) | 0.78 | 0.46 | 1.31 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 1.4 | 0.87 |
Portier | 171 (15) | 0.66 | 0.45 | 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.48 | 1.1 | 0.75 |
Nordlinger1 | 342 (29) | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 1.14 | 0.87 |
Ychou | 306 (26) | 0.89 | 0.66 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 0.72 | 1.64 | 0.97 |
Primrose | 236 (20) | 1.48 | 1.04 | 2.12 | 1.49 | 0.86 | 2.6 | 1.52 |
- Citation: Araujo RLC, Herman P, Riechelmann RP. Recurrence-free survival as a putative surrogate for overall survival in phase III trials of curative-intent treatment of colorectal liver metastases: Systematic review. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8(3): 266-272
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v8/i3/266.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.266