Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2015; 6(6): 252-263
Published online Dec 10, 2015. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i6.252
Table 1 Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in triple negative breast cancer
Ref.Total numberNo. of TNBC subjectsEGFR expression1
Thike et al[9], 2010704876730%
Patil et al[10], 20116831367.4%
Nielsen et al[24], 2004-21 basal like tumours57%
Rakha et al[45], 2007172628237% in TNBC vs 15% in non-TNBC
Mehdizadeh et al[47], 2012113210323.3%
Rydén et al[48], 20105644841% TNBC vs 11% non-TNBC
Table 2 Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor expression in triple negative breast cancer
Ref.Total numberNo. of TNBCVEGFR-2 expression1
Mehdizadeh et al[47], 2012113210393.2%
Iosifidou et al[62], 2009-7377%
Chanana et al[63], 2012702754% vs 23%
Linderholm et al[67], 200867987Higher intratumour VEGF levels in TNBC
Andre et al[68], 2009693534%
Table 3 C-kit expression in triple negative breast cancer
Ref.Total numberNo. of TNBCC-kit expression1
Thike et al[9], 20107048767CK 5/6 in 6%, CK-14 in 48%, CK-17 in 50%, C-kit in 45%
Nielsen et al[24], 2004-21CK 5/6 in 62% and C-kit in 29%
Kim et al[76], 2009625147CK5/6 in 35.4% and C-kit in 11.6%
Bryan et al[78], 200666475% of TNBC vs 29% of non-TNBC
Table 4 p-53 expression in triple negative breast cancer
Ref.Total numberNo. of TNBCp-53 expression
Patil et al[10], 2011683135/68347.8%
Nielsen et al[24], 2004111182%
Rakha et al[45], 20071726282/172656% in TNBC vs 22% in non-TNBC
Chae et al[90], 200813532/13540.6% in TNBC vs 42.7% in non- TNBC
Biganzoli et al[89], 2011-(633 + 1026) from two separate sourcesDivided TNBC into subclass BL which accounts for 89% of total TNBCs