BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2026; 17(4): 118954
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.118954
Table 1 Summary of key studies on renal cell carcinoma at the European Society for Medical Oncology 2025 Congress
Ref.
Study name
Study design
Main findings
Burgers et al[3], 2025NESCIOPhase II randomized controlled trialThe ipilimumab plus nivolumab group and the relatlimab plus nivolumab group both met the prespecified primary endpoint of pathologic response, demonstrating clear antitumor activity, with the short-course (6-week) therapy being well-tolerated
Haake et al[6], 2025 OPTIC RCCProspective phase II multicenter studyTargeted immunotherapy based on molecular subtypes achieved a higher ORR in the selected population compared to historical controls (nivolumab plus cabozantinib) (75% vs 55%)
Hahn et al[20], 2025 LenCaboMulticenter phase II randomized controlled trialLenvatinib plus everolimus vs cabozantinib monotherapy: Superior median PFS (15.7 months vs 10.2 months), reducing disease progression risk by 49% (HR = 0.51); higher ORR (52.6% vs 38.6%); but higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (67.5% vs 50.0%)
Huang et al[25], 2025 Dynamic ctDNA-MRD MonitoringCohort studyctDNA levels decreased significantly after treatment; patients with persistently negative MRD had a lower risk of disease progression, and their median PFS was significantly longer than that of MRD-positive patients (not reached vs 14 months)
Huang et al[23], 2025 CLEAR-ITPhase II studyCadonilimab plus lenvatinib in patients progressing on prior immunotherapy: ORR was 29%, DCR was 96%, median PFS was 16.8 months, with a low incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (12.5%)
Kim et al[10], 2025 AI-based Immune Phenotype Analysis ModelCohort studyPatients with an “inflammatory” phenotype had significantly better PFS, OS, and ORR with dual immunotherapy (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) than with sunitinib, while no significant difference in efficacy was observed between the two treatments in patients with a “non-inflammatory” phenotype
Larkin et al[2], 2025 RAMPARTPhase III randomized controlled trialDurvalumab plus tremelimumab vs active surveillance significantly improved DFS in the overall population (2-year DFS rate: 81% vs 73%); the significant benefit was entirely driven by the high-risk recurrence population (HR = 0.52), with no clear benefit observed in the intermediate-risk group
Machaalani et al[9], 2025 Soluble MAdCAM-1 Translational StudyCohort studyHigher baseline plasma soluble MAdCAM-1 (sMAdCAM-1) levels were independently associated with longer PFS and OS
Seront et al[24], 2025 RENALUTMulticenter, open-label phase II trialFirst exploration of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in RCC resistant to both TKIs and ICIs; the study is ongoing, and results are pending
Simsek et al[8], 2025 COSMIC-313Randomized controlled trialDensity of a specific CD8+ T-cell subset (CD8+ PD-1 + TIM-3-LAG-3 TILs) significantly correlated with efficacy: The high-density group had an ORR of 60.4% and median PFS was not reached; the low-density group had an ORR of 37.9% and median PFS was only 9.3 months
Ye et al[26], 2025FRUSICA-2Phase III randomized controlled trialCompared to standard second-line monotherapy (axitinib or everolimus), the combination regimen significantly extended median PFS to 22.21 months (vs 6.90 months) and increased ORR to 60.5% (vs 24.3%), without increasing treatment-related death risk