Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2026; 17(4): 118954
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.118954
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.118954
Table 1 Summary of key studies on renal cell carcinoma at the European Society for Medical Oncology 2025 Congress
| Ref. | Study name | Study design | Main findings |
| Burgers et al[3], 2025 | NESCIO | Phase II randomized controlled trial | The ipilimumab plus nivolumab group and the relatlimab plus nivolumab group both met the prespecified primary endpoint of pathologic response, demonstrating clear antitumor activity, with the short-course (6-week) therapy being well-tolerated |
| Haake et al[6], 2025 | OPTIC RCC | Prospective phase II multicenter study | Targeted immunotherapy based on molecular subtypes achieved a higher ORR in the selected population compared to historical controls (nivolumab plus cabozantinib) (75% vs 55%) |
| Hahn et al[20], 2025 | LenCabo | Multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial | Lenvatinib plus everolimus vs cabozantinib monotherapy: Superior median PFS (15.7 months vs 10.2 months), reducing disease progression risk by 49% (HR = 0.51); higher ORR (52.6% vs 38.6%); but higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (67.5% vs 50.0%) |
| Huang et al[25], 2025 | Dynamic ctDNA-MRD Monitoring | Cohort study | ctDNA levels decreased significantly after treatment; patients with persistently negative MRD had a lower risk of disease progression, and their median PFS was significantly longer than that of MRD-positive patients (not reached vs 14 months) |
| Huang et al[23], 2025 | CLEAR-IT | Phase II study | Cadonilimab plus lenvatinib in patients progressing on prior immunotherapy: ORR was 29%, DCR was 96%, median PFS was 16.8 months, with a low incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (12.5%) |
| Kim et al[10], 2025 | AI-based Immune Phenotype Analysis Model | Cohort study | Patients with an “inflammatory” phenotype had significantly better PFS, OS, and ORR with dual immunotherapy (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) than with sunitinib, while no significant difference in efficacy was observed between the two treatments in patients with a “non-inflammatory” phenotype |
| Larkin et al[2], 2025 | RAMPART | Phase III randomized controlled trial | Durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs active surveillance significantly improved DFS in the overall population (2-year DFS rate: 81% vs 73%); the significant benefit was entirely driven by the high-risk recurrence population (HR = 0.52), with no clear benefit observed in the intermediate-risk group |
| Machaalani et al[9], 2025 | Soluble MAdCAM-1 Translational Study | Cohort study | Higher baseline plasma soluble MAdCAM-1 (sMAdCAM-1) levels were independently associated with longer PFS and OS |
| Seront et al[24], 2025 | RENALUT | Multicenter, open-label phase II trial | First exploration of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in RCC resistant to both TKIs and ICIs; the study is ongoing, and results are pending |
| Simsek et al[8], 2025 | COSMIC-313 | Randomized controlled trial | Density of a specific CD8+ T-cell subset (CD8+ PD-1 + TIM-3-LAG-3 TILs) significantly correlated with efficacy: The high-density group had an ORR of 60.4% and median PFS was not reached; the low-density group had an ORR of 37.9% and median PFS was only 9.3 months |
| Ye et al[26], 2025 | FRUSICA-2 | Phase III randomized controlled trial | Compared to standard second-line monotherapy (axitinib or everolimus), the combination regimen significantly extended median PFS to 22.21 months (vs 6.90 months) and increased ORR to 60.5% (vs 24.3%), without increasing treatment-related death risk |
- Citation: Liu ZY, Zhou Y, Zhao FH, Wang L, Pan TJ, Gao L. New breakthroughs and future trends in renal cell carcinoma therapy: Highlights from the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology Annual Congress. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(4): 118954
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i4/118954.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.118954
