Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2026; 17(4): 117540
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.117540
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.117540
Table 1 Major driver gene mutations and targeted therapy strategies in breast cancer
| Gene/biomarker | Mutation type | Related pathway | Main subtype association | Targeted agent | Key clinical evidence |
| PIK3CA | Somatic hotspot mutations | PI3K/AKT/mTOR | HR+/HER2- | Alpelisib (PI3Kα inhibitor) | SOLAR-1 study: Significant PFS benefit[5] |
| ESR1 | Acquired mutations | Estrogen signaling | HR+/HER2- | Elacestrant (SERD) | EMERALD study: Superior to standard endocrine therapy[6] |
| BRCA1/2 | Germline/somatic mutations | Homologous recombination repair | TNBC, HR+/HER2- | Olaparib, talazoparib (PARP inhibitors) | OlympiAD, EMBRACA studies: PFS benefit[7,8] |
| AKT1 | Somatic mutation (E17K) | PI3K/AKT/mTOR | HR+/HER2- | Capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) | CAPItello-291 study: Significant PFS benefit[9] |
| HER2 (ERBB2) | Somatic mutations | HER2 signaling | HR+/HER2- (non-amplified) | Neratinib (TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor) | SUMMIT basket trial: Demonstrated antitumor activity[10] |
Table 2 Acquired resistance mechanisms and subsequent management strategies for major targeted therapies in breast cancer
| Prior therapy | Category of resistance mechanism | Specific molecular event | Biological consequence | Potential subsequent strategy | Clinical evidence/considerations | Validation level |
| CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib) | Cell cycle pathway alteration | RB1 gene loss/mutation | Loss of key downstream brake, uncontrolled cell cycle | Switch to chemotherapy; ADCs (e.g., sacituzumab govitecan) | Poor prognosis, reduced response to subsequent endocrine therapy[18] | Clinically validated |
| CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib) | Upstream pathway activation | Acquired PIK3CA or AKT1 mutations | Activation of alternative pathways, bypassing G1 arrest | Combine with or switch to pathway inhibitors (e.g., alpelisib, capivasertib) | SOLAR-1, CAPItello-291 studies show PFS benefit[5,9] | Clinically validated |
| CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib) | Other mechanisms | Cyclin E (CCNE1/2) amplification; CDK2 upregulation | Direct drive into S phase, independent of CDK4/6 | Investigational CDK2 inhibitors; novel SERDs | Clear preclinical evidence, clinical trials ongoing[19] | Emerging clinical/preclinical |
| PI3Kα inhibitor (e.g., alpelisib) | Target up/downstream alteration | PTEN loss; AKT1 E17K mutation | Enhanced pathway signaling output | Switch to AKT inhibitor (capivasertib) | CAPItello-291 study confirms capivasertib efficacy[9] | Clinically validated |
| PI3Kα inhibitor (e.g., alpelisib) | Bypass activation | ERBB2/HER2, FGFR, MET amplification/overexpression | Reactivation of downstream signaling via RTKs | Corresponding RTK inhibitors (e.g., neratinib) in combination | Requires identification via NGS; mostly in trials[20] | Emerging clinical/preclinical |
| PARP inhibitor (e.g., olaparib) | HRR function restoration | BRCA1/2 reversion mutations | Restores HRR, abolishes “synthetic lethality” | Switch to platinum-based chemotherapy; DNA damaging agents | Common cross-resistance with platinum; clinical evidence[21] | Clinically validated |
| Selective ER degrader (e.g., elacestrant) | Continued ER activation | De novo or clonally expanded ESR1 mutations (e.g., Y537S) | Insensitivity to existing SERDs, constitutive activation | Switch to chemotherapy; explore next-gen SERDs or PROTACs | Different ESR1 mutations have varying SERD sensitivity[24] | Clinically validated |
| Selective ER degrader (e.g., elacestrant) | Bypass pathway activation | PIK3CA, AKT1 mutations | Provides ER-independent growth signals | Combine with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors | A common mechanism for endocrine therapy resistance[26] | Emerging clinical |
Table 3 Core challenges in precision therapy for driver genes in breast cancer
| Challenge dimension | Specific problem | Impact on clinical practice |
| Technology and management | Lack of standardization: Non-uniform gene coverage and bioinformatics pipelines across NGS panels | Poor comparability of results, affecting reliability of treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment[31] |
| Technology and management | VUS interpretation dilemma: Interpretation of “VUS” highly dependent on expert experience | Leads to clinical decision hesitancy, potentially causing patient anxiety or missed treatment opportunities[32] |
| Tumor biology | Spatiotemporal heterogeneity: Significant clonal evolution between primary and metastatic sites, and pre-/post-treatment | Single biopsy fails to represent the whole tumor landscape, leading to treatment failure based on localized information[34] |
| Tumor biology | Complex resistance mechanisms: Involve on-target mutations, bypass activation, histological transformation, etc. | Makes subsequent treatment selection extremely complex, often requiring re-biopsy for dynamic assessment[35] |
| Clinical translation | Drug toxicity management: e.g., hyperglycemia with alpelisib | Affects patient quality of life and treatment adherence[11] |
| Clinical translation | Optimization of combination strategies and sequencing: Unclear optimal order of targeted agents | Difficult to maximize efficacy and delay resistance; most combinations remain exploratory[35] |
Table 4 Future innovative therapeutic strategies to address current challenges
| Current challenge | Future innovative strategy | Representative technology/drug class | Potential advantage and mechanism |
| Multi-mechanism resistance | ADCs | T-DXd, SG | Deliver high-potency cytotoxic agents precisely to tumor cells via a “biological missile” approach, potentially overcoming resistance from bypass activation, etc. |
| Tumor heterogeneity and drug targeting | Novel drug delivery systems | Nanocarriers, prodrugs | Increase drug concentration at tumor sites, enable tumor microenvironment-specific activation, thereby reducing systemic exposure and adverse effects |
- Citation: Liu ZY, Chen R. Precision therapy for driver gene mutations in breast cancer: Current landscape and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(4): 117540
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i4/117540.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.117540
