BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2026; 17(4): 117540
Published online Apr 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i4.117540
Table 1 Major driver gene mutations and targeted therapy strategies in breast cancer
Gene/biomarker
Mutation type
Related pathway
Main subtype association
Targeted agent
Key clinical evidence
PIK3CASomatic hotspot mutationsPI3K/AKT/mTORHR+/HER2-Alpelisib (PI3Kα inhibitor)SOLAR-1 study: Significant PFS benefit[5]
ESR1Acquired mutationsEstrogen signalingHR+/HER2-Elacestrant (SERD)EMERALD study: Superior to standard endocrine therapy[6]
BRCA1/2Germline/somatic mutationsHomologous recombination repairTNBC, HR+/HER2-Olaparib, talazoparib (PARP inhibitors)OlympiAD, EMBRACA studies: PFS benefit[7,8]
AKT1Somatic mutation (E17K)PI3K/AKT/mTORHR+/HER2-Capivasertib (AKT inhibitor)CAPItello-291 study: Significant PFS benefit[9]
HER2 (ERBB2)Somatic mutationsHER2 signalingHR+/HER2- (non-amplified)Neratinib (TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor)SUMMIT basket trial: Demonstrated antitumor activity[10]
Table 2 Acquired resistance mechanisms and subsequent management strategies for major targeted therapies in breast cancer
Prior therapy
Category of resistance mechanism
Specific molecular event
Biological consequence
Potential subsequent strategy
Clinical evidence/considerations
Validation level
CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib)Cell cycle pathway alterationRB1 gene loss/mutationLoss of key downstream brake, uncontrolled cell cycleSwitch to chemotherapy; ADCs (e.g., sacituzumab govitecan)Poor prognosis, reduced response to subsequent endocrine therapy[18]Clinically validated
CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib)Upstream pathway activationAcquired PIK3CA or AKT1 mutationsActivation of alternative pathways, bypassing G1 arrestCombine with or switch to pathway inhibitors (e.g., alpelisib, capivasertib)SOLAR-1, CAPItello-291 studies show PFS benefit[5,9]Clinically validated
CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib)Other mechanismsCyclin E (CCNE1/2) amplification; CDK2 upregulationDirect drive into S phase, independent of CDK4/6Investigational CDK2 inhibitors; novel SERDsClear preclinical evidence, clinical trials ongoing[19]Emerging clinical/preclinical
PI3Kα inhibitor (e.g., alpelisib)Target up/downstream alterationPTEN loss; AKT1 E17K mutationEnhanced pathway signaling outputSwitch to AKT inhibitor (capivasertib)CAPItello-291 study confirms capivasertib efficacy[9]Clinically validated
PI3Kα inhibitor (e.g., alpelisib)Bypass activationERBB2/HER2, FGFR, MET amplification/overexpressionReactivation of downstream signaling via RTKsCorresponding RTK inhibitors (e.g., neratinib) in combinationRequires identification via NGS; mostly in trials[20]Emerging clinical/preclinical
PARP inhibitor (e.g., olaparib)HRR function restorationBRCA1/2 reversion mutationsRestores HRR, abolishes “synthetic lethality”Switch to platinum-based chemotherapy; DNA damaging agentsCommon cross-resistance with platinum; clinical evidence[21]Clinically validated
Selective ER degrader (e.g., elacestrant)Continued ER activationDe novo or clonally expanded ESR1 mutations (e.g., Y537S)Insensitivity to existing SERDs, constitutive activationSwitch to chemotherapy; explore next-gen SERDs or PROTACsDifferent ESR1 mutations have varying SERD sensitivity[24]Clinically validated
Selective ER degrader (e.g., elacestrant)Bypass pathway activationPIK3CA, AKT1 mutationsProvides ER-independent growth signalsCombine with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitorsA common mechanism for endocrine therapy resistance[26]Emerging clinical
Table 3 Core challenges in precision therapy for driver genes in breast cancer
Challenge dimension
Specific problem
Impact on clinical practice
Technology and managementLack of standardization: Non-uniform gene coverage and bioinformatics pipelines across NGS panelsPoor comparability of results, affecting reliability of treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment[31]
Technology and managementVUS interpretation dilemma: Interpretation of “VUS” highly dependent on expert experienceLeads to clinical decision hesitancy, potentially causing patient anxiety or missed treatment opportunities[32]
Tumor biologySpatiotemporal heterogeneity: Significant clonal evolution between primary and metastatic sites, and pre-/post-treatmentSingle biopsy fails to represent the whole tumor landscape, leading to treatment failure based on localized information[34]
Tumor biologyComplex resistance mechanisms: Involve on-target mutations, bypass activation, histological transformation, etc.Makes subsequent treatment selection extremely complex, often requiring re-biopsy for dynamic assessment[35]
Clinical translationDrug toxicity management: e.g., hyperglycemia with alpelisibAffects patient quality of life and treatment adherence[11]
Clinical translationOptimization of combination strategies and sequencing: Unclear optimal order of targeted agentsDifficult to maximize efficacy and delay resistance; most combinations remain exploratory[35]
Table 4 Future innovative therapeutic strategies to address current challenges
Current challenge
Future innovative strategy
Representative technology/drug class
Potential advantage and mechanism
Multi-mechanism resistanceADCsT-DXd, SGDeliver high-potency cytotoxic agents precisely to tumor cells via a “biological missile” approach, potentially overcoming resistance from bypass activation, etc.
Tumor heterogeneity and drug targetingNovel drug delivery systemsNanocarriers, prodrugsIncrease drug concentration at tumor sites, enable tumor microenvironment-specific activation, thereby reducing systemic exposure and adverse effects