Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2025; 16(9): 109034
Published online Sep 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.109034
Published online Sep 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.109034
Table 1 Therapeutic use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, randomized controlled trials: Study and population characteristics
Year | Ref./trial | Arms | Patients cohort | Oncologic exclusion criteria | CY+ | PCI | Ascites | Liver mets | Lung mets | Syncronous/metachronous (PM/CY+) |
2011 | Yang et al[27] | Arm 1: CRS-A (n = 34). Arm 2: CRS-H (n = 34) | 68 | Any lung metastasis, liver metastasis, prominent retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis | ND | CRS-H arm: 2-36 (median: 15). CRS-A arm: 3-23 (median: 15) | ND | No | No | Synchronous [PM (n = 51)], metachronous [PM (n = 17)] |
2014 | Rudloff/GYMSSA | Arm 1: FOLFOXIRI alone arm-S. Cht (n = 8). Arm 2: GYMS arm— CRS-H + S. Cht (n = 9) | 17 | Disease sites other than either peritoneum, lung or liver. Evidence of extensive para-aortic/retro-pancreatic lymph node metastases. Significant ascites | Yes | GYMS arm: PCI ≤ 20, n = 8/9 (89%); PCI = 21, n = 1/9 (11%) | No | Yes | Yes | Synchronous [PM (n = 14); CY+ (n = 1)], metachronous [PM (n = 2)] |
2023 | Rau/GASTRIPEC-I | Arm 1: CRS-A (n = 53). Arm 2: CRS-H (n = 52) | 105 | Further distant metastases except Krukenberg tumors. Pretreated with chemotherapy/radiotherapy | No | PCI ≥ 7 (44%) | Yes (40%) | No | No | Synchronous [PM (n = 105)] |
Table 2 Therapeutic use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, controlled trials: Study and population characteristics
Year | Ref./trial | Controlled trial phase | Patient cohort | Positive peritoneal cytology | PCI | Median PCI | Ascites | N stage | Syncronous metastasis only |
2020 | Blum Murphy et al[31] | 1 | 27 | Yes | < 8 (52%), 8-14 (15%), 15-21 (11%), > 21 (22%) | 6 | Admitted (41%) | ND | Yes |
2020 | Yu et al[30] | 2 | 38 | Yes | ≤ 20 (100%) | 8.8 | Admitted | 72.2% ypN+ (convertion to surgery group) | Yes |
2020 | PERISCOPE 1 | 1 and 2 | 25 | Yes | < 7 (100%) | 2 | ND | 68% ypN+ | Yes1 |
2021 | Badgwell et al[35] | 2 | 20 | Yes | 0 (40%), 1-2 (35%), > 3 (25%) | ND | ND | 70% ypN+ | Yes |
2023 | Green et al[34] | 2 | 41 | Yes | ≤ 10 (100%) | 2 | Excluded if > 500 cc | 68% ypN+ | Yes |
Table 3 Therapeutic use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, randomized controlled trials: Treatments and outcomes
Year | Ref./trial | Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy protocol | Completeness of cytoreduction score (CC 0-1) | Neodjuvant Cht | Neoadjuvant treatment regimen | Adjuvant Cht | Adjuvant treatment regimen | Median OS (month) | 1 year OS | 2 years OS | 3 years OS | Median relapse-free survival (month) |
2011 | Yang et al[27] | Cisplatin 120 mg + mitomycin C 30 mg for 60-90 minutes | CRS-A: 58.8% (20 of 34), CRS-H: 58.8% (20 of 34) | No | No | Yes | ND | CRS-A: 6.5 months vs CRS-H: 11.0 months | CRS-A: 29.4% vs CRS-H: 41.2% | CRS-A: 5.9% vs CRS-H: 14.7% | CRS-A: 0% vs CRS-H: 5.9% | ND |
2014 | Rudloff/GYMSSA | Oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2 for 30 minutes. Prior to perfusion: 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 IV and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 IV | CRS-H: 88.8% (8 of 9) | Yes. GYMS arm (n = 6/9), SA arm (n = 7/8) | ND | Yes | FOLFOXIRI | SA arm: 4.3 months vs GYMS arm: 11.3 months | SA arm: 0% vs GYMS arm: 44% | SA arm: 0% vs GYMS arm: 22% | SA arm: 0% vs GYMS arm: 22% | ND |
2023 | Rau/GASTRIPEC-I | Mitomycin C 15 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 for 60 minutes | CRS-A: 41.5% (22 of 53), CRS-H: 53.8% (28 of 52) | Yes (all) | HER-2+: Cisplatin, capecitabine, trastuzumab; HER-2-: Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine | Yes | HER-2+: Cisplatin, capecitabine, trastuzumab; HER-2-: Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine or fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel | CRS-A: 14.9 months vs CRS-H: 14.9 months | CRS-A: 60.5% vs CRS-H: 58.2% | CRS-A: 15.4% vs CRS-H: 25.5% | CRS-A: 0% vs CRS-H: 13.6% | CRS-A: 3.5 months vs CRS-H: 7.1 months |
Table 4 Therapeutic use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, controlled trials: Treatments and outcomes (all patients received neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy)
Year | Ref./trail | Patient cohort | S. Cht protocol | S. Cht cycles | N-HIPEC | Laparoscopic N-HIPEC | N-HIPEC protocol | N-HIPEC cycles | Convertion to surgery | T-HIPEC protocol | NIPEC | Adjuvant HIPEC bed site | OS media | 1 year OS | 2 years OS | 3 years OS | Relapse-free survival media (month) |
2020 | Blum Murphy et al[31] | 27 | 5-FU/OX (n = 24%-89%), 5-FU/OX/Pacli (n = 3%-11%) | 9 (range 4-24) | Yes | 27 patients | Mitomycin C (30 mg) + cisplatin (200 mg). Paclitaxel (dosing was started at 20 mg/m2 and sequentially increased up to 60 mg/m2) | 1 | CRS-H (6/27), CRS-A (1/27) 25.9% | ND | No | No | ND | 73.9% | 58.1% | ND | ND |
2020 | Yu et al[30] | 38 | Pacli + S1 (Transtuzumab added in HER-2+) | 4 | Yes | No | Paclitaxel (75 mg/m2) for 60 minutes | 2 | 18 (47.4%) | Paclitaxel (75 mg/m2) for 60 minutes | No | Yes (twice within 72 hours after CRS) | Conversion therapy group 21.1 months | 63.2% | 47.40% | ND | ND |
2020 | Koemans/PERISCOPE 1 | 25 | Epirubicin + cisplatin + capecitabin (n = 10), docetaxel + oxaliplatin + capecitabin (n = 7), capecitabin + oxaliplatin (n = 3), 5-FU/OX (n = 2), capecitabin + oxaliplatin (n = 3), Transtuzumab added in HER-2+ | 3 | No | No | No | No | No | Oxaliplatin (460 mg/sm) for 30 minutes | Docetaxel for 90 minutes in a dose-level escalation scheme (0, 50, 75 mg/m2) | No | 15 months | ND | ND | ND | 12 months |
2021 | Badgwell et al[35] | 20 | 5-FU+ OX (n = 17/20), Triplet therapy (n = 3/20) | < 8 (20%), 8-10 (75%), > 10 (5%) | Yes | 20 patients | Mitomycin C (30 mg) + cisplatin (200 mg) for 60 minutes | 2 (n = 5/20), 1 (n = 15/20) | No | Mitomycin C (30 mg) + cisplatin (200 mg) for 60 minutes | No | No | 22.1 months | 90% | 50% | 28% | ND |
2023 | Green et al[34] | 41 | Fluoruracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (56%), fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (24%), radiotherapy (17%) | ND | Yes | 23 patients | Cisplatin (90 mg/mq) + mitomycin C (10 mg/mq or 30 mg/mq) for 60 minutes | 1 or 2 | No | Cisplatin (90 mg/mq) + mitomycin C (10 mg/mq) for 60 minutes | No | No | 24.9 months | ND | ND | 25% | 7.4 months |
Table 5 Prophylactic use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, randomized controlled trials: Study and population characteristics, treatments and outcomes
Year | Ref. | State | Arms | Patient cohort | HIPEC sample | Oncological admission criteria (TNM stage) | Bedsite HIPEC | HIPEC protocol | Neoadjuvant CHT | Neoadjuvant treatment regimen | Adjuvant Cht | Adjuvant treatment regimen |
2014 | Cui et al[36] | China | Arm 1: Surgery alone (n = 48). Arm 2: Neoadjuvant Cht + surgery (n = 48). Arm 3: Surgery + postoperative HIPEC (n = 48). Arm 4: Neoadjuvant Cht + surgery + postoperative HIPEC (n = 48) | 192 | Arm 3 + 4: n = 98 | IIIA-IIIC + no Neoadjuvant Cht before enrollement | Yes | Day 1 and 4: 60 mg/m2 cisplatin, 90 minutes. Day 2 and 3: 0.75 g fluorouracil, 90 minutes +1000 cc of perfusate left in place for 23 hours at the end of each cycle | Yes | Paclitaxel, cisplatin, tegafur | Yes, if tumor progression occurred during neodjuvant treatment | Epirubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil |
2019 | Reutovich et al[37] | Belarus | Arm 1: Gastrectomy + HIPEC (n = 76). Arm 2: Gastrectomy only (n = 78) | 154 | 76 | IIB-IIIC + Borrmann type III-IV | No | Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, 60 minutes closed abdomen | No | _ | No | Not declared |
2021 | Fan et al[38] | China | Arm 1: S.Cht (n = 17). Arm 2: T-HIPEC + adjuvant S.Cht (n = 33) | 50 | 33 | IIIA-B | No | Cisplatin (50 mg/L), 30 minutes | No | _ | Yes | S1 + oxaliplatin |
2022 | Liu et al[39] | China | 4 weeks after D2 gastrectomy: Arm 1: Bedside HIPEC + oral S1 treatment; arm 2: IV cisplatin + oral S1 treatment | 114 | 57 | III A-B | Yes | Day 1 and 3: Cisplatin (30 mg/m2) + oral S1, (40-60 mg for 14 days) | No | _ | Yes | 6-8 cycles of IV cisplatin (60 mg/m2) + oral S1 (40-60 mg, 2/day) |
2023 | Yu et al[40] | China | Arm 1: HIPEC + Cht. Arm 2: Systemic chemotherapy alone | 134 | 67 | IIIA and B + no Neoadjuvant Cht before enrollement | Yes | Cisplatin (40 mg/m2), 60 minutes, 2 cycles within 72 hours after surgery | No | _ | Yes | 6-8 cycles of S1 + oxaliplatin |
Table 6 Prophylactic use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, randomized controlled trials: Studies outcomes
Year | Ref. | State | Arms | Median OS | 1 year OS | 3 years OS | Median RFS | RFS 2 years | RFS 3 years | Peritoneal recurrence |
2014 | Cui et al[36] | China | Arm 1: Surgery alone (n = 48). Arm 2: Neoadjuvant Cht + surgery (n = 48). Arm 3: Surgery + postoperative HIPEC (n = 48). Arm 4: Neoadjuvant Cht + surgery + postoperative HIPEC (n = 48) | Arm 1: 27 months. Arm 2: 33 months. Arm 3: 32 months. Arm 4: 36 months | Arm 1: 79.2%. Arm 2: 87.5%. Arm 3: 85.4%. Arm 4: 93.7% | Arm 1: 35.4%. Arm 2: 62.5%. Arm 3: 58.3%. Arm 4: 75.0% | Arm 1: 26 months. Arm 2: 28 months. Arm 3: 31 months. Arm 4: 33 months | Arm 1: 66.7%. Arm 2: 77.1%. Arm 3: 83.3%. Arm 4: 87.5% | ND | ND |
2019 | Reutovich et al[37] | Belarus | Arm 1: Gastrectomy + HIPEC (n = 76). Arm 2: Gastrectomy only (n = 78) | ND | ND | ND | Arm 1: 28 months vs arm 2: 13 months | ND | Arm 1: 47% vs arm 2: 27% | 12.8% vs 27.6% |
2021 | Fan et al[38] | China | Arm 1: S. Cht (n = 17). Arm 2: Traditional-HIPEC + adjuvant S. Cht (n = 33) | ND | ND | Arm 1: 100% vs arm 2: 87.9% | ND | ND | Arm 1: 88.2% vs arm 2: 84.8% | ND |
2022 | Liu et al[39] | China | 4 weeks after D2 gastrectomy: Arm 1: Bedside HIPEC + oral S-1 treatment; arm 2: IV cisplatin + oral S-1 treatment | Arm 1: 42 months vs arm 2: 31 months | ND | ND | Arm 1: 29 months vs arm 2: 15 months | Arm 1: 50.4% vs arm 2: 25.5% | ND | 0% vs 7% |
2023 | Yu et al[40] | China | Arm 1: HIPEC + Cht. Arm 2: Systemic chemotherapy alone | 51.4 months | ND | Arm 1: 73.9% vs arm 2: 77.6% | ND | ND | Arm 1: 73.8% vs arm 2: 61.2% | 20.9% vs 40.3% |
- Citation: D'Acapito F, Framarini M, Morgagni P, Di Pietrantonio D, Vittimberga G, Zucchini V, Ercolani G. Advancing gastric cancer treatment: A comprehensive review of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy’s role and outcomes. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(9): 109034
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i9/109034.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.109034