Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Oncol. Nov 24, 2024; 15(11): 1404-1411
Published online Nov 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i11.1404
Table 1 Baseline information, n (%)
IndicatorsSex (male/female)Age (year, mean ± SD)TNM
IIB
III
APS + GS (n = 41)24/1760.10 ± 11.2617 (41.16)24 (58.54)
GS regimen (n = 56)37/1958.35 ± 10.3622 (39.29)34 (60.71)
χ2 or t value0.5760.7800.047
P value0.4480.4380.829
Table 2 Comparison of short-term efficacy, n (%)

ORR
DCR
APS + GS (n = 41)21 (51.22)23 (56.10)
GS regimen (n = 56)17 (30.36)20 (35.71)
χ2 value4.3233.985
P value0.0380.046
Table 3 Immune function (%, mean ± SD)
Indicators
CD3+
CD4+
CD8+
CD4+/CD8+
IL-2 (pg/mL)
INF-γ (pg/mL)
APS + GS (n = 41)50.18 ± 9.5731.52 ± 5.3318.65 ± 6.371.69 ± 0.213.30 ± 0.8312.64 ± 4.90
GS regimen (n = 56)44.06 ± 8.5526.01 ± 7.8318.06 ± 3.801.44 ± 0.212.67 ± 0.5111.55 ± 3.70
t value3.3073.8860.5765.8524.5811.253
P value0.0010.0000.5660.0000.0000.213
Table 4 Adverse reactions and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores, n (%)

Leukopenia
Thrombocytopenia
Liver function damage
Fatigue
Thick greasy tongue coating
Weak pulse
APS + GS (n = 41)7 (17.07)4 (9.76)6 (14.63)13 (31.71)6 (14.63)3 (7.31)
GS regimen (n = 56)21 (37.50)16 (28.57)22 (39.29)34 (60.71)18 (32.14)14 (25.00)
χ2 value4.8105.1207.0057.9743.8975.068
P value0.0280.0240.0080.0050.0480.024