Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2022; 13(7): 577-586
Published online Jul 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i7.577
Published online Jul 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i7.577
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the study population
Characteristic | Group A (ESAS) (n = 100) | Group B (No-ESAS) (n = 100) | P value |
Age (mean ± SD) | 57.7 ± 11.5 | 56.6 ± 12.4 | 0.524 |
Age groups, n (%) | 0.880 | ||
≤ 60 yr | 64 (64) | 62 (62) | |
> 60 yr | 36 (36) | 38 (38) | |
Premenopausal status | 51 (51) | 34 (34) | 0.015 |
Breast cancer stage, n (%) | |||
I | 44 (44) | 36 (36) | 0.506 |
II | 28 (28) | 31 (31) | |
III | 28 (28) | 33 (33) | |
Cancer histology, n (%) | |||
Ductal | 84 (84) | 88 (88) | 0.415 |
Lobular | 16 (16) | 12 (12) | |
Tumour size (mean ± SD) , n (%) | 0.258 | ||
≤ 2 cm | 52 (52) | 44 (44) | |
> 2 cm | 48 (48) | 56 (56) | |
Lymph node status, n (%) | 0.883 | ||
N0 | 66 (66) | 59 (59) | |
N+ | 34 (34) | 41 (41) | |
Himmunohistochemical classification, n (%) | 0.754 | ||
Luminal A | 12 (12) | 8 (8) | |
Luminal B | 21 (21) | 25 (25) | |
HER2 positive | 55 (55) | 54 (54) | |
TNBC | 12(12) | 13 (13) | |
Type of surgery, n (%) | 0.157 | ||
BCS | 58 (58) | 48 (48) | |
Mastectomy | 42 (42) | 52 (52) |
Table 2 Outcomes of interest during the chemotherapy treatment in the study population
Variable | Group A (ESAS) | Group B (No ESAS) |
N of doctor visit scheduled for each patient | 3 | 16 |
Total No. of scheduled doctor visits | 300 | 1600 |
N of patients requiring adjunctive visit on the bases of ESAS score > 3 | 48 | - |
N of adjunctive visits on the bases of ESAS score > 3 | 130 | - |
N of patients requiring unplanned doctor visits | 6 | 12 |
N of unplanned doctor visit | 8 | 18 |
Effective total No. of doctor visitsa | 438 | 1618 |
N of visits for each patient (mean ± SD)b | 4.38 ± 0.51 | 16.18 ± 1.82 |
Adverse effects during chemotherapy treatment | 2 | 3 |
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression for factors associated with the need of additional medical visits before chemotherapy in patients the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Group (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale score > 3)
Variable | Odds ratio | St. Error | Z-score | 95%CI | P value |
Age | |||||
> 60 (n = 36) | 4.93 | 0.695 | 1.596 | 1.26-19.25 | 0.022a |
≤ 60 (n = 64) | Ref. | ||||
Lymph node status | |||||
Positive (n = 44) | 0.50 | 0.662 | 0.691 | 0.13-1.83 | 0.297 |
Negative (n = 66) | Ref. | ||||
Type of surgery | |||||
Mastectomy (n = 42) | 0.15 | 0.726 | -1.895 | 0.03-0.62 | 0.009b |
BCS (n = 58) | Ref. | ||||
IHC classification | |||||
Luminal (n = 33) | 1.96 | 0.699 | 0.674 | 0.49-7.73 | 0.335 |
Non-Luminal (n = 67) | Ref. | ||||
Tumour stage | |||||
I (n = 44) | 0.86 | 0.880 | 0.149 | 1.12-35.44 | 0.036c |
II/III (n = 56) | Ref. |
- Citation: Sanna V, Fedele P, Deiana G, Alicicco MG, Ninniri C, Santoro AN, Pazzola A, Fancellu A. Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale may reduce medical visits in patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13(7): 577-586
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v13/i7/577.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v13.i7.577