Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2022; 13(2): 71-100
Published online Feb 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71
Published online Feb 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71
Table 1 Non-hormonal treatments (Classic moisturizers and lubricants and innovative preparations) in breast cancer survivors: Summary of studies and their outcomes
| Ref. | Yr | n1 | Design | Treatment | Conclusion |
| Loprinzi et al[119] | 1997 | 45 | A double-blind, crossover, randomized clinical trial | Vaginal lubricating preparation, (Replens®) | Both Replens and the placebo appear to substantially ameliorate vaginal dryness and dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors |
| Lee et al[129] | 2011 | 44 vs 42 | Randomised controlled trial, double blinded | pH balanced gel vs placebo for 12 wk | Vaginal pH balanced gel could relieve vaginal symptoms |
| Juraskova et al[137] | 2013 | 25 | Prospective, observational study | polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer + olive oil as a lubricant during intercourse | Significant improvements in dyspareunia, sexual function, and quality of life over time |
| Goetsch et al[130,131] | 2014 2015 | 46 | Double-blind rct | 4% aqueous lidocaine vs saline | Significative and safe reduction in dyspareunia |
| Hickey et al[128] | 2016 | In a single-center, randomized, double-blind, ab/ba crossover design | Water- vs silicone-based lubricants | Total sexual discomfort was lower after use of silicone-based lubricant than water-based | |
| Juliato et al[126] | 2017 | 25 vs 25 | Randomised trial | Polyacrylic acid vs lubricant | Polyacrylic acid was superior to lubricant |
| Marschalek et al[136] | 2017 | 11 vs 11 | Randomised controlled trial, double blinded pilot study | Vaginal lactobacillus capsules vs placebo | Lactobacillus improves microbiota in BCSs |
| Hersant et al[139] | 2018 | 20 | Prospective, comparative (before/after) pilot study | A-PRP and evaluated at 0,1,3 and 6 mo | A-PRP improves vaginal mucosa in 6 mo treatment according VHI criteria |
| Chatsiproios et al[125] | 2019 | 128 | Open, prospective, multicentre, observational study. | oil-in-water emulsion during 28 d | This treatment seems to improve VVA symptoms with a short treatment |
| Carter et al[122] | 2021 | 101 | Single-arm, prospective longitudinal trial | Hyaluronic acid (HLA) vaginal gel for 12 wk | HLA moisturization improved vulvovaginal health/sexual function of cancer survivors |
Table 2 Systemic hormonal treatments in breast cancer survivors: summary of studies and their outcomes
| Ref. | Yr | n1 | Design | Treatment | Conclusion |
| Holmberg et al[147,149] | 2004 2008 | 221 vs 221 | Randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trial | Oral estradiol hemihydrate and Norethisterone (cyclic or continuous) vs control | In BCSs, an increased risk of new breast cancer events and adverse events were observed after 2 yr of therapy (HR = 2.4) |
| von Schoultz et al[150] | 2005 | 188 vs 190 | Randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trial | 2 mg estradiol for 21 d with addition of 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for last 10 d; or 2 mg estradiol for 84 d with 20 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for last 10 d; or 2 mg estradiol valerate daily | No increased risk of breast cancer recurrence; trial was closed early. So, HT doses of estrogen and progestogen and treatment regimens for menopausal hormone therapy may be associated with the recurrence of breast cancer |
| Kenemans et al[153] | 2009 | 1556 vs 1542 | Prospective randomized placebo controlled | Tibolone 2.5 mg daily or placebo | Trial was closed early. Tibolone had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer recurrence |
| Cai et al[168] | 2020 | 1728 vs 3456 | Retrospective matched cohort study | Incidence rate in ospemifene users vs untreated patients | No differences were observed in the BC incidence and recurrence rates in ospemifene users compared with matched controls |
Table 3 Local hormonal treatments in breast cancer survivors: summary of studies and their outcomes
| Ref. | Yr | n1 | Design | Treatment | Conclusion |
| Dew et al[178] | 2003 | 69 | Retrospective Cohort study | Estriol 0.5 mg cream and pessaries (33); Estradiol 25 μgtablets (n = 33) | VET does not seem to be associated with increased RR of BC |
| Kendall et al[190] | 2005 | 7 | Prospective before-after analysis | Estradiol 25 mg daily for 2 wk | Vaginal estradiol tablet significantly raises systemic estradiol levels. This reverses the estradiol suppression achieved by AIs in women with BC and is contraindicated |
| Biglia N et al[179] | 2010 | 26 | Prospective study | Estriol cream 0.25 mg (n = 10) or estradiol tablets 12.5 microg (n = 8) polycarbophil-based moisturizer 2.5 g (Replens®) (n = 8) | VET is effective in improving symptoms and objective evaluations in BCSs |
| Pfeifer et al[180] | 2011 | 10 | Prospective before-after analysis | 0.5 mg vaginal estriol daily for 2 wk | Increase in FHS and LH may indicate systemic estradiol effects |
| Whiterby et al[201] | 2011 | 21 | Phase I/II pilot Before-After study | Testosterone cream daily for 28 d. 300/ 150 μg | Vaginal testosterone was associated with improved signs and symptoms of vaginal atrophy related to AI therapy without increasing estradiol or testosterone levels |
| Wills et al[49] | 2012 | 24 vs 24 | Prospective clinical trial | 25 mcg estradiol vaginal tablet or ring vs control | VET treatment increases E2 levels. Should be used with caution |
| Le Ray et al[187] | 2012 | 13479TAM (n = 10806) or AIs (n = 2673) | Retrospective, nested case-control study | Vaginal cream and tablets containing estrogen | Use of VET is not associated with increase in BC recurrence in those treated with TMX or AI |
| Dahir et al[202] | 2014 | 13 | Pilot before-after study | Testosterone cream daily for 28 d, 300 μg | Improvement in FSFI scores |
| Donders et al[181] | 2014 | 16 | Open label bicentric phase I pharmacokinetic study | 0.03 mg Estriol + Lactobacillus | Estriol + Lactobacillusis safe in BCpatients andimprovessymptoms |
| Melisko et al[204] | 2016 | 69 | Randomised non-comparative study | Estradiol ring 7.5 ng vs Testosterone cream at 1% concentration: 1.5 mg/wk | Transient increase in E2 that finally reached normal levels. Meets the primary safety endpoint |
| Davis et al[203] | 2018 | 44 | Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial | Testosterone cream daily for 26 week/ 300 μg vs placebo | Testosterone improves sexual test items compared to placebo |
Table 4 Vaginal laser therapy in breast cancer survivors: Summary of studies and their outcomes.
| Ref. | Yr | n1 | Design | Treatment | Conclusion |
| Pieralli et al[223] | 2016 | 50 | Prospective Before-after study | 3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 d | The treatment seems to be feasible and effective |
| Pagano et al[221] | 2016 | 26 | Observational retrospective study | 3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 d | The treatment seems to be effective and with good tolerance |
| Gambacciani et al[218] | 2017 | 43 | Pilot before-after study | 3 sessions of Vaginal Erbium Laser every 30 d | The treatment seems to be effective |
| Pagano et al[214] | 2018 | 82 | Observational retrospective study | 3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 d | The treatment seems to be effective |
| Mothes et al[225] | 2018 | 16 | Retrospective study | 1 session of Vaginal Erbium YAG Laser | The treatment seems to be effective |
| Pearson et al[222] | 2019 | 26 | Single-arm pilot study Before-After study | 3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 d | The treatment seems to improve sexual function and vaginal atrophy |
| Areas et al[224] | 2019 | 24 | Open, prospective study | 3 sessions of Vaginal Erbium YAG Laser every 30 d | The treatment seems to improve sexual function and vaginal atrophy |
Table 5 Treatment options for management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in specific patient populations: Consensus recommendations of the The North American Menopause Society[65]
| General guidelines |
| Individualize treatment, taking into account risk of recurrence, severity of symptoms, effect on QoL, and personal preferences |
| Moisturizers and lubricants, pelvic floor physical therapy, and dilator therapy are firstline treatments |
| Involve treating oncologist in decision making when considering the use of local hormone therapies1 |
| Ospemifene, an oral SERM, has not been studied in women at risk for breast cancer and is not FDAapproved for use in women with or at high risk for breast cancer |
| Offlabel use of compounded vaginal testosterone or estriol is not recommended |
| Laser therapy may be considered in women who prefer a nonhormonal approach; women must be counseled regarding lack of longterm safety and efficacy data |
| Women at high risk for breast cancer2 |
| Local hormone therapies are a reasonable option for women who have failed nonhormonal treatment |
| Observational data do not suggest increased risk of breast cancer with systemic or local estrogen therapies beyond baseline risk |
| Women with ERpositive breast cancers on tamoxifen |
| Tamoxifen is a SERM that acts as an ER antagonist in breast tissue; small transient elevations in serum hormone levels noted with local hormone therapies in women on tamoxifen are less concerning than in women on AIs |
| Women with persistent, severe symptoms who have failed nonhormonal treatments and who have factors suggesting a low risk of recurrence may be candidates for local hormone therapy |
| Women with ERpositive breast cancers on AI |
| AIs block conversion of androgen to estrogen, resulting in undetectable serum estradiol levels; transient elevations in estradiol levels may be of concern |
| GSM symptoms are often more severe |
| Women with severe symptoms who have failed nonhormonal treatments may still be candidates for local hormone therapies after review with the woman’s oncologist vs consider switching to tamoxifen |
| Women with triplenegative breast cancers |
| Theoretically, the use of local hormone therapy in women with a history of triplenegative disease is reasonable, but data are lacking |
| Women with metastatic disease |
| QoL, comfort, and intimacy may be a priority for many women with metastatic disease |
| Use of local hormone therapy in women with metastatic disease and probable extended survival may be viewed differently than in women with limited survival when QOL may be a priority |
- Citation: Lubián López DM. Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: An update. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13(2): 71-100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v13/i2/71.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71
