Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2022; 13(10): 789-801
Published online Oct 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789
Published online Oct 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789
Table 1 Patient and surgical characteristics for patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction
| Patient | Age | ASA | Sex | BMI (kg/m2) | Surgery | Indication |
| 1 | 80 | 3 | F | 29.1 | Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT3N1M0 |
| 2 | 59 | 1 | F | 20.0 | Left hemicolectomy, transvaginal NOSE | Splenic flexure cancer pT3N1M0 |
| 3 | 82 | 3 | F | 22.4 | Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT3N0M0 |
| 4 | 43 | 2 | F | 31.7 | Anterior resection, transanal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT1N0M0 |
| 5 | 78 | 3 | F | 21.6 | Right hemicolectomy (D3), transvaginal NOSE | Transverse colon cancer pT3N1M0 |
| 6 | 63 | 2 | F | 28.0 | Right hemicolectomy (D3), transvaginal NOSE | Hepatic flexure cancer pT1N0M0 |
| 7 | 77 | 2 | M | 20.3 | Anterior resection with DI, transanal NOSE | Mid rectal cancer pT3N1M0 |
| 8 | 50 | 2 | F | 28.0 | Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT3N0M0 |
| 9 | 77 | 2 | M | 24.3 | Anterior resection with DI, transanal NOSE | Mid rectal cancer pT3N1M0 |
| 10 | 79 | 3 | M | 24.3 | Anterior resection, transanal NOSE | Upper rectal cancer pT3N1M0 |
| 11 | 73 | 3 | M | 22.4 | Anterior resection, transanal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT4N2M1 |
| 12 | 58 | 2 | F | 23.5 | Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT2N0M0 |
| 13 | 67 | 2 | M | 27.6 | Anterior resection, transanal NOSE | Sigmoid cancer pT2N1M0 |
| 14 | 58 | 2 | F | 23.8 | Left hemicolectomy, transvaginal NOSE | Splenic flexure cancer pT1N0M0 |
Table 2 Intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction
| Patient | Operative time (min) | Blood loss (mL) | Time to first flatus/ BO (da) | Postoperative LOS (da) | Postoperative complications |
| 1 | 235 | 30 | 1/1 | 4 | Nil |
| 2 | 170 | 20 | 1/2 | 3 | Nil |
| 3 | 210 | 30 | 2/2 | 3 | Nil |
| 4 | 200 | 20 | 1/1 | 3 | Nil |
| 5 | 260 | 100 | 2/1 | 3 | Nil |
| 6 | 255 | 50 | 2/2 | 5 | Chylous ascites |
| 7 | 265 | 80 | 1/1 | 3 | Nil |
| 8 | 175 | 10 | 1/1 | 3 | Nil |
| 9 | 300 | 150 | 1/1 | 6 | High stoma output |
| 10 | 365 | 100 | 1/1 | 3 | Nil |
| 11 | 205 | 20 | 1/2 | 3 | Nil |
| 12 | 155 | 30 | 1/2 | 2 | Nil |
| 13 | 205 | 10 | 2/2 | 3 | Nil |
| 14 | 180 | 50 | 1/2 | 3 | Nil |
Table 3 Comparison of characteristics between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
| Characteristic | NOSE, n = 14 Frequency (%) | Non-NOSE, n = 56 Frequency (%) | P value |
| Age, mean ± SD (yr) | 67.4 ± 12.4 | 73.1 ± 10.2 | 0.182 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 5 (35.7) | 21 (37.5) | 0.765 |
| Female | 9 (64.3) | 35 (62.5) | |
| BMI, mean ± SD (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 3.5 | 24.0 ± 4.1 | 0.526 |
| ASA score | |||
| 1 | 1 (7.1) | 1 (1.8) | 0.265 |
| 2 | 8 (57.1) | 43 (76.8) | |
| 3 | 5 (35.7) | 12 (21.4) | |
| Tumor location | |||
| Caecum to transverse colon | 2 (14.3) | 18 (32.1) | 0.219 |
| Splenic flexure to sigmoid | 9 (64.3) | 22 (39.3) | |
| Rectum | 3 (21.4) | 16 (28.6) | |
| Surgery | |||
| Anterior resection | 7 (50.0) | 23 (41.1) | 0.576 |
| Low anterior resection | 3 (21.4) | 13 (23.2) | |
| Left hemicolectomy | 2 (14.3) | 3 (5.4) | |
| Right hemicolectomy | 2 (14.3) | 17 (30.4) | |
| Defunctioning stoma creation | |||
| Yes | 3 (21.4) | 9 (16.1) | 0.634 |
| No | 11 (78.6) | 47 (83.9) | |
| AJCC pT stage | |||
| T1 | 4 (28.6) | 7 (12.5) | 0.527 |
| T2 | 2 (14.3) | 10 (17.9) | |
| T3 | 7 (50) | 33 (58.9) | |
| T4 | 1 (7.1) | 6 (10.7) | |
| AJCC pN stage | |||
| N0 | 6 (42.9) | 33 (58.9) | 0.236 |
| N1 | 7 (50.0) | 15 (26.8) | |
| N2 | 1 (7.1) | 8 (14.3) | |
| M stage | |||
| M0 | 13 (92.9) | 55 (98.2) | 0.282 |
| M1 | 1 (7.1) | 1 (1.8) | |
| Stage | |||
| I | 4 (28.6) | 13 (23.2) | 0.162 |
| II | 1 (7.1) | 20 (35.7) | |
| III | 8 (57.1) | 22 (39.3) | |
| IV | 1 (7.1) | 1 (1.8) |
Table 4 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
| Outcome | NOSE n = 14 Frequency (%) | Non-NOSE n = 56 Frequency (%) | P value |
| Duration of surgery, mean ± SD (min) | 227 ± 55 | 261 ± 96 | 0.463 |
| Intraoperative complications | |||
| Yes | 0 (0) | 2 (3.6) | 0.473 |
| No | 14 (100) | 54 (96.4) | |
| 30-day postoperative complications | |||
| Yes | 2 (14.3) | 13 (23.2) | 0.466 |
| No | 12 (85.7) | 43 (76.8) | |
| Clavien-Dindo classification | 0.202 | ||
| 1 | 1 (7.1) | 5 (8.9) | |
| 2 | 1 (7.1) | 7 (12.5) | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | 1 (1.8) | |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Time to first bowel movement, mean ± SD (d) | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 2.0 | <0.001 |
| Length of hospitalization stay, mean ± SD (d) | 3.4 ± 1.0 | 6.4 ± 5.3 | <0.001 |
| POD 1 highest pain scorea, mean ± SD | 1.5 ± 1.9 | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 0.012 |
| POD 2 highest pain scorea, mean ± SD | 0.7 ± 1.5 | 1.8 ± 2.2 | 0.066 |
| POD 1 PCA total morphine use, mean ± SD (mg) | 1.4 ± 3.3 | 6.7 ± 8.1 | 0.002 |
| POD 2 PCA total morphine use, mean ± SD (mg) | 0 | 2.5 ± 5.1 | 0.005 |
- Citation: Seow-En I, Chen LR, Li YX, Zhao Y, Chen JH, Abdullah HR, Tan EKW. Outcomes after natural orifice extraction vs conventional specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13(10): 789-801
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v13/i10/789.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789
