Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2021; 12(12): 1169-1181
Published online Dec 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1169
Published online Dec 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1169
Table 1 Techniques for circulating tumour cell isolation, markers, and their limitations
No. | Name | Property | Markers | Limitations | Ref. |
1 | CellSearch | Isolation by anti-EpCAM antibody coated immunomagnetic beads | EpCAM, CKs, CD45, DAPI | Only suitable for cancer of epithelial origin but not for that undergoing the EMT | [48] |
Cells are not viable after detection | |||||
2 | AdnaTest | Separation by way of anti-EpCAM and anti-MUC1 antibody coated immunomagnetic beads | EpCAM, MUC1, mucin-1, HER2 | Possible false-positive finding due to expression of a selection marker being present in other cells other than CTCs | [49] |
Cells are not viable after detection | |||||
3 | MACS | Immunomagnetic CTC enrichment by antibodies against cell surface markers | CK19, EpCAM, Her-2, MUC-1 CK7, CK8, CK18, CK19 | Lengthy processing time and low sensitivity | [50] |
4 | MagSweeper (Illumina Inc) | Immunomagnetic isolation of CTC by antibodies against EpCAM and cellsurface markers | EpCAM, CD45, DAPI | Less sensitive during the early stages of tumour development | [51] |
Captured cells are viable with intact RNA | |||||
5 | CTC Chip | Utilizes bifurcating traps to capture CTCs, release via flow reversal | EpCAM, CKs, CD45, DAPI | Identification of CTCs is lower than other methods | [52] |
6 | GEM chip | Geometrically enhanced mixing chip structure that allows enhanced capture of CTC on antibody coated surfaces | EpCAM, DAPI, CD45, cytokeratin | Low sensitivity | [53] |
7 | Onco Quick (Greiner BioOne, Frickenhausen, Germany) | Separation of erythrocytes and some leukocytes from CTC. High sensitivity, Quantification | CCNE2, DKFZp762E1312, EMP2 | No morphology confirmation; not really capture CTCs | [54] |
8 | ISET (Rarecells Diagnostics) | Rapid processing; non-antigen dependent; Filter based approach | CKs, EGFR, VE-cadherin, Ki67 | Size-dependent, manual processing | [55] |
9 | EPISPOT | Removes leukocytes via CD45 depletion | CD45, CK19, mucin-1, cathepsin-D | Problem arises when antigen levels are lower or binding efficiency is reduced | [56] |
Can detect viable CTCs | |||||
10 | Ficoll + RT-PCR | Separation of CTC based on size dependent enrichment. High Sensitivity | CK-19, HER2, h-MAM, CEA, maspin, GABA A, B726P | No morphology confirmation | [57] |
11 | Cyttel Method | Negative immune-magnetic selection of WBC (CD45 antibody)-High detection rate | CD45 | - | [58] |
12 | MetaCell | Size-based enrichment and separation for viable CTCs | CK-18, -19, -20, CK-7, EPCAM, MUC1, HER2, EGFR | Lengthy processing time | [59] |
Table 2 Studies showing postoperative isolation of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer–markers, techniques, and clinical implications
No. | Technology | Markers | Number of patients | TNM stage | Correlation | Clinical significance | Ref. |
1 | CellSearch system | EpCAM | 164 | I-III | With stage | N/A | [60] |
EpCAM | 24 | IV | With therapy response | May be used in monitoring response to therapy | [61] | ||
EpCAM | 97 | II | With stage | Correlates with stage | [62] | ||
CD133+, CD54+, CD44+ | 15 (nmCRC); 95 (mCRC) | I-IV | ≥ 5 CTCs were 8 times more likely to develop distant metastasis. CTC counts show good correlation with colorectal neoplasm | Independent prognostic marker for nmCRC | [63] | ||
hTERT, CK19, CK20, CEA | 438 | I-III | - | Poor relapse free survival | [64] | ||
hTERT, CK19, CK20, CEA | 157 | I-III | With stage | Poor relapse free survival and overall survival | [65] | ||
Survivin, CK20 and CEA | 156 | I-III | With stages (Duke’s) and lymph node metastasis. | Useful as an adjunct in detection of CRC patients | [66] | ||
CD133, CEA, CK20, CK19, | 197 | II-III | CEA/CK/CD133 expression and stage (Duke’s) | Prognostic significance (Duke's stages B and C) | [44] | ||
hTERT, CK-19, CK-20, CEA, GAPDH and mRNA | 72 | I-IV | CEA, mRNA: With stage, vascular invasion, and postoperative metastasis | Prognostic and predictive | [67] | ||
2 | Flow-cytometry with immunofluorescence | CTCs | 18 | I-III | With stage and also detected in an early cancer stage. | Predictive | [68] |
3 | Pyrosequencing | KRAS (Codon 12/13) | 26 | IV | No association | Prognostic | [69] |
4 | MetaCell separation method | CTCs | 98 | I-IV | CTC-positive in 83% | Prognosis and predictive | [70] |
CTC-negative in 17% | |||||||
5 | Mag Sweeper | PIK3CA | 242 | - | Mutational discordance found between CTCs, DTCs, and metastases, and among CTCs; DTCs from this patient propagated in vitro contained a PIK3CA mutation | Investigating new drug therapies | [71] |
6 | CTC-Chip | EpCAM, HER2, and EGFR | - | - | Efficiency of 87.5% | In situ protein expression, and culture CTCs from the same set of cells | [72] |
Table 3 Circulating tumour cells in metastatic vs non-metastatic colorectal cancer
No. | Type of CRC | Markers used | Detection method used | Relevance | Clinical implications | Limitations of the study | Ref. |
1 | nmCRC | CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 | Cyttel | Diagnostic/prognostic/predictive | Combination of CTCs and CEA: Diagnostic and prognostic indicators | Small sample size, weak power of the study | [73] |
2 | mCRC | CK, CD45 | Immunomagnetic separation | Prognostic/predictive | The number of CTCs before and during treatment is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with mCRC | The baseline unfavourable CTC was low (26%) and overall CTC yield was less than in other epithelial cells | [74] |
3 | mCRC | ALDH1, CD44, CD133, MRP5, Survivin | qRT-PCR | Prognostic | Poor prognosis and chemo therapy non-responsiveness | Require further molecular analyses of CTCs for selection of targeted agents | [75] |
Survivin and MRP5 selection of mCRC patients resistant to 5-FU and L-OHP | |||||||
4 | mCRC | CEA | Cyttel method, immunofluorescence in situ hybridization technologies (imFISH) | Prognostic | PFS, OS | Small sample size | [6] |
Lack of dynamic enumeration of CTCs | |||||||
5 | mCRC | VEGF, CD133+, CD34+/KDR + EPC, CD-34-VEGFR2 | Flow cytometry/IHC | Prognostic | Treatment response; PFS, OS | - | [76] |
6 | nmCRC | CD133, CD166, CD44, EpCAM, ALDH1 | Tissue microarray, IHC | Prognostic | No association with poor clinical response; OS | Treatment information was missing (local recurrence, distant metastasis, and postoperative therapy) | [77] |
7 | nmCRC | CK19, MUC1, CD44, CD133, ALDH1 | Flow-cytometry, CellSearch, Cytomorphology, qPCR | Prognostic | May be useful as a therapeutic target; PFS, OS | - | [78] |
- Citation: Yadav A, Kumar A, Siddiqui MH. Detection of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer: Emerging techniques and clinical implications. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(12): 1169-1181
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i12/1169.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1169