Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2021; 12(12): 1101-1156
Published online Dec 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1101
Published online Dec 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1101
Toxin | Mechanism | Necrosis pattern |
Acetaminophen (paracetamol)[19,36,37] | Free radical enhancement and Kupffer cell activation | Pericentral |
Carbon tetrachloride[19,30,37] | Free radical enhancement and Kupffer cell activation | Pericentral |
Concanavalin A[37] | T-cell activation; cytokine release; ICAM-1 & VCAM-1 upregulation. | Centrilobular |
D-Galactosamine[19,37] | Uridine metabolite deficiency | Random |
Ethanol[19,31] | Increases production of reactive oxygen species and infiltration of inflammatory cells | None |
Lipopolysaccharide[37] | Kupffer cell activation | Centrilobular |
Thioacetamide[19,37,38] | Increases production of toxic metabolites and reactive oxygen species | Pericentral |
Yr | First author | Gene product | Study title | Ref. |
1994 | Webber | TGF-α | “Overexpression of transforming growth factor-alpha causes liver enlargement and increased hepatocyte proliferation in transgenic mice” | [55] |
1996 | Cressman | IL-6 | “Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice” | [56] |
1997 | Yamada | TNF | “Initiation of liver growth by tumor necrosis factor: deficient liver regeneration in mice lacking type I tumor necrosis factor receptor” | [57] |
1998 | Greenbaum | C/EBP-β | “CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta is required for normal hepatocyte proliferation in mice after partial hepatectomy | [58] |
1998 | Rai | iNOS | “Impaired liver regeneration in inducible nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice” | [59] |
1998 | Roselli | uPA | “Liver regeneration is transiently impaired in urokinase-deficient mice” | [60] |
1998 | Yamada | TNFR-1TNFR-2 | “Analysis of liver regeneration in mice lacking type 1 or type 2 tumor necrosis factor receptor: requirement for type 1 but not type 2 receptor” | [61] |
2002 | Anderson | PPAR-α | “Delayed liver regeneration in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha-null mice” | [62] |
2003 | Leu | IGFBP-1 | “Impaired hepatocyte DNA synthetic response posthepatectomy in insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1-deficient mice with defects in C/EBP beta and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase regulation” | [63] |
2003 | Strey | C3a/C5a | “The proinflammatory mediators C3a and C5a are essential for liver regeneration” | [64] |
2004 | Borowiak | Met | “Met provides essential signals for liver regeneration” | [65] |
2004 | Mohammed | TIMP3 | “Abnormal TNF activity in Timp3(–/–) mice leads to chronic hepatic inflammation and failure of liver regeneration | [66] |
2004 | Nakamura | OSM | “Hepatocyte proliferation and tissue remodeling is impaired after liver injury in oncostatin M receptor knockout mice” | [67] |
2004 | Oe | TGF-β | “Intact signaling by transforming growth factor beta is not required for termination of liver regeneration in mice” | [68] |
2005 | Duffield | DTR | “Selective depletion of macrophages reveals distinct, opposing roles during liver injury and repair” | [69] |
2005 | Mitchell | HB-EGF | “Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor links hepatocyte priming with cell cycle progression during liver regeneration” | [70] |
2005 | Oliver | MT | “Impaired hepatic regeneration in metallothionein-I/II knockout mice” | [71] |
2005 | Seki | MyD88 | “Contribution of Toll-like receptor/myeloid differentiation factor 88 signaling to murine liver regeneration” | [72] |
2006 | Fernández | Caveolin-1 | “Caveolin-1 is essential for liver regeneration” | [73] |
2006 | Olle | MMP9 | “Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is an important factor in hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice” | [74] |
2007 | Mayoral | Caveolin-1 | “Dispensability and dynamics of caveolin-1 during liver regeneration and in isolated hepatic Cells” | [75] |
2009 | Tumanov | Rag1LT | “T cell-derived lymphotoxin regulates liver regeneration” | [54] |
2010 | Erhardt | CCR5, CXCR3 | “Tolerance induction in response to liver inflammation” | [47] |
2010 | Liu | GPC3 | “Suppression of liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation in hepatocyte-targeted glypican 3 transgenic mice” | [76] |
2012 | Borude | FXR | “Hepatocyte-Specific Deletion of Farnesoid X Receptor Delays But Does Not Inhibit Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy in Mice” | [77] |
2013 | Bhave | GPC3 | “Regulation of Liver Growth by Glypican 3, CD81, Hedgehog, and Hhex” | [78] |
2014 | Kong | FGF15 | “Fibroblast growth factor 15 deficiency impairs liver regeneration in mice” | [79] |
2014 | Yang | Lrp5/6 | “β-catenin signaling in murine liver zonation and regeneration: a Wnt-Wnt situation!” | [80] |
2015 | Lu | Mdm2 | “Hepatic progenitor cells of biliary origin with liver repopulation capacity” | [81] |
2016 | Swiderska-Syn | Cre recombinase | “Hedgehog regulates yes-associated protein 1 in regenerating mouse liver” | [82] |
2018 | Tsagianni | MET | “Combined Systemic Disruption of MET and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Causes Liver Failure in Normal Mice” | [83] |
2019 | Asrud | Epac | “Mice depleted for Exchange Proteins Directly Activated by cAMP (Epac) exhibit irregular liver regeneration in response to partial hepatectomy” | [84] |
2019 | Fortier | p38α MAPK | “Hepatospecific ablation of p38α MAPK governs liver regeneration through modulation of inflammatory response to CCl 4-induced acute injury” | [85] |
2019 | Modares | IL-6R | “IL-6 Trans-signaling Controls Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy” | [86] |
2019 | Zhou | Rictor | “Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 Signaling Is Required for Liver Regeneration in a Cholestatic Liver Injury Murine Model” | [87] |
2020 | Laschinger | CGRP-RAMP1 | “The CGRP receptor component RAMP1 links sensory innervation with YAP activity in the regenerating liver” | [88] |
2020 | Seguin | Mfrn1, Mfrn2 | “The mitochondrial metal transporters mitoferrin1 and mitoferrin2 are required for liver regeneration and cell proliferation in mice” | [89] |
2020 | Xue | GPC3 | “Phosphorylated Ezrin (Thr567) Regulates Hippo Pathway and Yes-Associated Protein (Yap) in Liver” | [90] |
Advantages | Disadvantages |
Vertebrate body plan | Partial genome duplication in teleosts |
Ease of husbandry | Differences in microanatomy and liver architecture |
Inexpensive to maintain | Less conserved physiology than mammalian models |
Large numbers of embryos produced rapidly | Less conserved morphogenesis than mammals |
External development | Less developed cell culture technology |
Optical clarity during development | Poorly developed embryonic stem cell technology |
Zebrafish liver not required for foetal haematopoiesis | |
Amenable to forward and reverse genetics | |
Molecular conservation of development | |
Amenable to high-throughput screening: (1) Phenotype assessment; and (2) Drug/chemical screening |
First author | Yr | Liver scaffold source | Cell source & type | Repopulation route | Outcomes | Ref. |
Uygun | 2010 | Rat | Rat hepatocytes | Portal vein | Recellularised liver grafts implanted in rats, perfused in vivo for 8 h, explanted and assessed after 24 h, demonstrating hepatocyte survival, albumin secretion, urea synthesis and cytochrome P450 expression. | Uygun 2010[127] |
Zhou | 2011 | Mouse | Human foetal hepatocytes | Portal vein | Recellularised liver matrix implanted in mice, achieving hepatocyte survival after 6 wk, with albumin secretion and cytochrome P450 expression. | Zhou 2011[131] |
Ko | 2014 | Pig | Murine endothelial cells, after scaffold conjugation with rat anti-mouse CD31 antibodies | Portal veinHepatic arteryInferior vena cava | Recellularised liver grafts implanted in pigs, demonstrating good blood flow and patency throughout vascular network over 24 h after transplantation. | Ko 2015[130] |
Navarro-Tableros | 2015 | Rat | Human liver stem-like cells | Portal vein | Loss of embryonic markers, expression of albumin, lactate dehydrogenase and cytochrome P450 subtypes. Production of urea and nitrogen. | Navarro-Tableros 2015[133] |
Ogiso | 2016 | Rat | Mouse hepatocytes | Biliary tree; Portal vein | (1) > 80% of cells seeded via biliary tree entered the parenchyma; (2) Approximate 20% of cells seeded via portal vein entered the parenchyma; and (3) Increased gene expression of foetal hepatocyte albumin, glucose 6-phosphatase, transferrin, cytokeratin 19, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, activation of liver detoxification enzymes, formation of biliary duct-like structures. | Ogiso 2016[132] [PMID 27767181] |
Verstegen | 2017 | Human | Human umbilical vein endothelial cells. | - | Re-endothelialisation of vascular tree, demonstrated by luminal vimentin and von Willebrand Factor/F8 staining. | Verstegen 2017[138] |
Butter | 2018 | Rat | Rat hepatocytes | Hepatic artery and portal vein | In vitro demonstration of hepatocyte spread to all liver lobes, with proliferation, and production of aminotransferases, lactate dehydrogenase and albumin. | Butter 2018[134] |
Chen | 2018 | Rat | Rat hepatocytes | Portal vein | None (description of materials and methods). | Chen 2018[135] |
Chen | 2019 | Rat | Rat cholangiocytes Rat hepatocytes | Common bile duct; Portal vein | In vitro viability and function demonstrated by albumin and urea secretion, and gene expression of functional proteins. | Chen 2019[136] |
Harper | 2020 | Rat | Rat bone marrow cells | Portal vein | Stem cells engrafted in portal, sinusoidal and hepatic vein compartments, achieving expression of endothelial cell surface markers for up to 30 d. | Harper 2020[118] |
Takeishi | 2020 | Rat | Human hepatocytes, biliary epithelial cells, and vascular endothelial cells derived from pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal cells, and fibroblasts. | Biliary tree; Portal vein; Central veins | Auxiliary grafts implanted in rats, achieving in vivo functionality for 4 d. | Takeishi 2020[137] |
- Citation: Hadjittofi C, Feretis M, Martin J, Harper S, Huguet E. Liver regeneration biology: Implications for liver tumour therapies. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(12): 1101-1156
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i12/1101.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1101