Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Nov 24, 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Table 1 Patient characteristics, n (%)
| RTCh | Ch | P value | |
| (n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
| Age | 60 (54-67) | 67 (62-73) | 0.32 |
| Gender | 0.29 | ||
| Male | 26 (65) | 21 (77.8) | |
| Performance status | 0.21 | ||
| ECOG 0 | 7 (17.5) | 5 (18.5) | |
| ECOG 1 | 33 (82.5) | 20 (74.1) | |
| ECOG 2 | 0 | 2 (7.4) | |
| Smoking habit | 0.48 | ||
| Yes | 20 (50) | 15 (55.6) | |
| No | 2 (5) | 3 (11.1) | |
| Former smoker | 18 (45) | 9 (33.3) | |
| Tumor localization | 0.33 | ||
| Apex | 7 (17.5) | 1 (3.7) | |
| Right upper lobe | 13 (32.5) | 13 (48.1) | |
| Right lower lobe | 6 (15) | 2 (7.4) | |
| Left upper lobe | 12 (30) | 9 (33.3) | |
| Left lower lobe | 2 (5) | 2 (7.4) | |
| Histology | 0.28 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 25 (62.5) | 20 (74.1) | |
| Squamous | 13 (32.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
| NSCLC1 | 0 | 1 (3.7) | |
| Large cell | 2 (5) | 0 | |
| Stage | 0.52 | ||
| IIIA | 27 (67.5) | 21 (77.8) | |
| IIIB | 12 (30) | 6 (22.2) | |
| IV | 1 (2.5) | 0 | |
| T | 0.08 | ||
| T1 | 4 (10) | 9 (33.3) | |
| T2 | 16 (40) | 9 (33.3) | |
| T3 | 10 (25) | 7 (25.9) | |
| T4 | 10 (25) | 2 (7.4) | |
| N | 0.04 | ||
| 0 | 5 (12.5) | 0 | |
| 2 | 34 (85) | 27 (100) | |
| 3 | 1 (2.5) | 0 | |
| Metastasis | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0.59 |
| Nodal station distribution | 0.012 | ||
| N0 | 6 (15) | 0 | |
| 1N2 | 12 (30) | 19 (70.4) | |
| 2N2 | 2 (5) | 1 (3.7) | |
| 1N2 + 1N1 | 13 (32.5) | 7 (25.9) | |
| 2N2 + 1N1 | 5 (12.5) | 0 | |
| 1N1 + 1N2 + 1N3 | 2 (5) | 0 | |
| Nodal staging method | 0.68 | ||
| EBUS | 24 (60) | 14 (51.9) | |
| Mediastinoscopy | 2 (5) | 3 (11.1) | |
| EBUS and mediastinoscopy | 8 (20) | 6 (22.2) | |
| EUS | 1 (2.5) | 2 (7.4) | |
| None | 5 (12.5) | 2 (7.4) |
Table 2 Chemotherapy regimens, n (%)
| RTCh | Ch | |
| (n = 40) | (n = 27) | |
| Cisplatin-Etoposide | 19 (47.5) | 0 |
| Cisplatin-Vinorelbine | 14 (35) | 6 (22.2) |
| Cisplatin-Pemetrexed | 4 (10) | 3 (11.1) |
| Cisplatin-Docetaxel | 0 | 6 (22.2) |
| Cisplatin-Gemcitabine | 0 | 2 (7.4) |
| Carboplatin-Vinorelbine | 3 (7.5) | 1 (3.7) |
| Carboplatin-Paclitaxel | 0 | 6 (22.2) |
| Carboplatin-Pemetrexed | 0 | 1 (3.7) |
| Carboplatin-Gemcitabine | 0 | 2 (7.4) |
Table 3 Radiological response, n (%)
| RTCh | Ch | P value | |
| (n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
| Disease progression | 1 (2.5) | 4 (14.8) | 0.025 |
| Stable disease | 14 (35) | 14 (51.9) | |
| Partial response | 25 (62.5) | 8 (29.6) | |
| Complete response | 0 | 1 (3.7) |
Table 4 Surgery characteristics, n (%)
| RTCh | Ch | P value | |
| (n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
| No surgery | 5 (12.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
| Type of surgery | 0.48 | ||
| Lobectomy | 21 (60) | 16 (76) | |
| Bilobectomy | 3 (8.6) | 1 (4.8) | |
| Pneumonectomy | 2 (5.7) | 1 (4.8) | |
| Lobectomy and vascular reconstruction | 1 (2.8) | 1 (4.8) | |
| Lobectomy and rib resection | 5 (14.3) | 1 (4.8) | |
| Lobectomy with rib resection and vertebrectomy | 3 (8.6) | 0 | |
| Segmentectomy with rib resection and vertebrectomy | 0 | 1 (4.8) | |
| Node level dissection | 0.26 | ||
| 2N2 + 1N1 | 4 (11.4) | 3 (14.3) | |
| 3N2 | 2 (5.7) | 5 (23.7) | |
| 3N2 + 1N1 | 12 (34.3) | 7 (33.3) | |
| 3N2 + 2N1 | 5 (14.3) | 3 (14.3) | |
| 4N2 + 1N1 | 8 (22.9) | 1 (4.8) | |
| 4N2 + 2N1 | 0 | 1 (4.8) | |
| 4N2 + 1N3 | 2 (5.7) | 0 | |
| 5N2 + 1N1 | 2 (5.7) | 1 (4.8) |
Table 5 Pathological response, n (%)
| RTCh | Ch | P value | |
| (n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
| No surgery | 5 (12.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
| Pathological complete response | 6 (17.1) | 1 (4.8) | 0.23 |
| Tumor response1 | 0.001 | ||
| 0%-10% | 19 (54.4) | 2 (9.5) | |
| 11%-30% | 9 (25.7) | 2 (9.5) | |
| 31%-50% | 4 (11.4) | 3 (14.3) | |
| 51%-70% | 2 (5.7) | 6 (28.6) | |
| > 70% | 1 (2.8) | 8 (38.1) | |
| Nodal response1 | 0.001 | ||
| 0%-10% | 30 (85.7) | 7 (33.3) | |
| 11%-30% | 1 (2.8) | 0 | |
| 31%-50% | 2 (5.7) | 3 (14.3) | |
| 51%-70% | 0 | 2 (9.5) | |
| > 70% | 2 (5.7) | 9 (42.9) | |
| Downstaging | 28 (80) | 7 (33.3) | 0.002 |
Table 6 Univariate analysis investigating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy radiochemotherapy on the response
| OR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Radiological response | |||
| Disease progression | Reference | ||
| Stable disease | 4 | 0.39-40.42 | 0.240 |
| Partial response | 12.5 | 1.21-128.61 | 0.035 |
| Complete response | NA1 | ||
| Pathological tumor response | |||
| 0%-10% | Reference | ||
| 11%-30% | 0.474 | 0.05-3.92 | 0.489 |
| 31%-50% | 0.14 | 0.17-1.13 | 0.065 |
| 51%-70% | 0.03 | 0.004-0.30 | 0.002 |
| > 70% | 0.01 | 0.001-0.16 | 0.001 |
| Pathological nodal response | |||
| 0%-10% | Reference | ||
| 11%-30% | 0.474 | 0.057-3.92 | 0.489 |
| 31%-50% | 0.14 | 0.17-0.13 | 0.065 |
| 51%-70% | 0.03 | 0.004-0.30 | 0.002 |
| > 70% | 0.01 | 0.001-0.16 | 0.001 |
| Downstaging | |||
| No | Reference | ||
| Yes | 8 | 2.34-27.32 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Muñoz-Guglielmetti D, Sanchez-Lorente D, Reyes R, Martinez D, Lucena C, Boada M, Paredes P, Parera-Roig M, Vollmer I, Mases J, Martin-Deleon R, Castillo S, Benegas M, Muñoz S, Mayoral M, Cases C, Mollà M, Casas F. Pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-contribution of IASLC recommendations. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i11/1047.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
