Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Nov 24, 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Table 1 Patient characteristics, n (%)
RTCh | Ch | P value | |
(n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
Age | 60 (54-67) | 67 (62-73) | 0.32 |
Gender | 0.29 | ||
Male | 26 (65) | 21 (77.8) | |
Performance status | 0.21 | ||
ECOG 0 | 7 (17.5) | 5 (18.5) | |
ECOG 1 | 33 (82.5) | 20 (74.1) | |
ECOG 2 | 0 | 2 (7.4) | |
Smoking habit | 0.48 | ||
Yes | 20 (50) | 15 (55.6) | |
No | 2 (5) | 3 (11.1) | |
Former smoker | 18 (45) | 9 (33.3) | |
Tumor localization | 0.33 | ||
Apex | 7 (17.5) | 1 (3.7) | |
Right upper lobe | 13 (32.5) | 13 (48.1) | |
Right lower lobe | 6 (15) | 2 (7.4) | |
Left upper lobe | 12 (30) | 9 (33.3) | |
Left lower lobe | 2 (5) | 2 (7.4) | |
Histology | 0.28 | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 25 (62.5) | 20 (74.1) | |
Squamous | 13 (32.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
NSCLC1 | 0 | 1 (3.7) | |
Large cell | 2 (5) | 0 | |
Stage | 0.52 | ||
IIIA | 27 (67.5) | 21 (77.8) | |
IIIB | 12 (30) | 6 (22.2) | |
IV | 1 (2.5) | 0 | |
T | 0.08 | ||
T1 | 4 (10) | 9 (33.3) | |
T2 | 16 (40) | 9 (33.3) | |
T3 | 10 (25) | 7 (25.9) | |
T4 | 10 (25) | 2 (7.4) | |
N | 0.04 | ||
0 | 5 (12.5) | 0 | |
2 | 34 (85) | 27 (100) | |
3 | 1 (2.5) | 0 | |
Metastasis | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0.59 |
Nodal station distribution | 0.012 | ||
N0 | 6 (15) | 0 | |
1N2 | 12 (30) | 19 (70.4) | |
2N2 | 2 (5) | 1 (3.7) | |
1N2 + 1N1 | 13 (32.5) | 7 (25.9) | |
2N2 + 1N1 | 5 (12.5) | 0 | |
1N1 + 1N2 + 1N3 | 2 (5) | 0 | |
Nodal staging method | 0.68 | ||
EBUS | 24 (60) | 14 (51.9) | |
Mediastinoscopy | 2 (5) | 3 (11.1) | |
EBUS and mediastinoscopy | 8 (20) | 6 (22.2) | |
EUS | 1 (2.5) | 2 (7.4) | |
None | 5 (12.5) | 2 (7.4) |
Table 2 Chemotherapy regimens, n (%)
RTCh | Ch | |
(n = 40) | (n = 27) | |
Cisplatin-Etoposide | 19 (47.5) | 0 |
Cisplatin-Vinorelbine | 14 (35) | 6 (22.2) |
Cisplatin-Pemetrexed | 4 (10) | 3 (11.1) |
Cisplatin-Docetaxel | 0 | 6 (22.2) |
Cisplatin-Gemcitabine | 0 | 2 (7.4) |
Carboplatin-Vinorelbine | 3 (7.5) | 1 (3.7) |
Carboplatin-Paclitaxel | 0 | 6 (22.2) |
Carboplatin-Pemetrexed | 0 | 1 (3.7) |
Carboplatin-Gemcitabine | 0 | 2 (7.4) |
Table 3 Radiological response, n (%)
RTCh | Ch | P value | |
(n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
Disease progression | 1 (2.5) | 4 (14.8) | 0.025 |
Stable disease | 14 (35) | 14 (51.9) | |
Partial response | 25 (62.5) | 8 (29.6) | |
Complete response | 0 | 1 (3.7) |
Table 4 Surgery characteristics, n (%)
RTCh | Ch | P value | |
(n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
No surgery | 5 (12.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
Type of surgery | 0.48 | ||
Lobectomy | 21 (60) | 16 (76) | |
Bilobectomy | 3 (8.6) | 1 (4.8) | |
Pneumonectomy | 2 (5.7) | 1 (4.8) | |
Lobectomy and vascular reconstruction | 1 (2.8) | 1 (4.8) | |
Lobectomy and rib resection | 5 (14.3) | 1 (4.8) | |
Lobectomy with rib resection and vertebrectomy | 3 (8.6) | 0 | |
Segmentectomy with rib resection and vertebrectomy | 0 | 1 (4.8) | |
Node level dissection | 0.26 | ||
2N2 + 1N1 | 4 (11.4) | 3 (14.3) | |
3N2 | 2 (5.7) | 5 (23.7) | |
3N2 + 1N1 | 12 (34.3) | 7 (33.3) | |
3N2 + 2N1 | 5 (14.3) | 3 (14.3) | |
4N2 + 1N1 | 8 (22.9) | 1 (4.8) | |
4N2 + 2N1 | 0 | 1 (4.8) | |
4N2 + 1N3 | 2 (5.7) | 0 | |
5N2 + 1N1 | 2 (5.7) | 1 (4.8) |
Table 5 Pathological response, n (%)
RTCh | Ch | P value | |
(n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
No surgery | 5 (12.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
Pathological complete response | 6 (17.1) | 1 (4.8) | 0.23 |
Tumor response1 | 0.001 | ||
0%-10% | 19 (54.4) | 2 (9.5) | |
11%-30% | 9 (25.7) | 2 (9.5) | |
31%-50% | 4 (11.4) | 3 (14.3) | |
51%-70% | 2 (5.7) | 6 (28.6) | |
> 70% | 1 (2.8) | 8 (38.1) | |
Nodal response1 | 0.001 | ||
0%-10% | 30 (85.7) | 7 (33.3) | |
11%-30% | 1 (2.8) | 0 | |
31%-50% | 2 (5.7) | 3 (14.3) | |
51%-70% | 0 | 2 (9.5) | |
> 70% | 2 (5.7) | 9 (42.9) | |
Downstaging | 28 (80) | 7 (33.3) | 0.002 |
Table 6 Univariate analysis investigating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy radiochemotherapy on the response
OR | 95%CI | P value | |
Radiological response | |||
Disease progression | Reference | ||
Stable disease | 4 | 0.39-40.42 | 0.240 |
Partial response | 12.5 | 1.21-128.61 | 0.035 |
Complete response | NA1 | ||
Pathological tumor response | |||
0%-10% | Reference | ||
11%-30% | 0.474 | 0.05-3.92 | 0.489 |
31%-50% | 0.14 | 0.17-1.13 | 0.065 |
51%-70% | 0.03 | 0.004-0.30 | 0.002 |
> 70% | 0.01 | 0.001-0.16 | 0.001 |
Pathological nodal response | |||
0%-10% | Reference | ||
11%-30% | 0.474 | 0.057-3.92 | 0.489 |
31%-50% | 0.14 | 0.17-0.13 | 0.065 |
51%-70% | 0.03 | 0.004-0.30 | 0.002 |
> 70% | 0.01 | 0.001-0.16 | 0.001 |
Downstaging | |||
No | Reference | ||
Yes | 8 | 2.34-27.32 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Muñoz-Guglielmetti D, Sanchez-Lorente D, Reyes R, Martinez D, Lucena C, Boada M, Paredes P, Parera-Roig M, Vollmer I, Mases J, Martin-Deleon R, Castillo S, Benegas M, Muñoz S, Mayoral M, Cases C, Mollà M, Casas F. Pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-contribution of IASLC recommendations. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i11/1047.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047