Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2019; 10(8): 283-292
Published online Aug 24, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i8.283
Published online Aug 24, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i8.283
Table 1 The clinical and treatment characteristics of the patients (n = 173)
| Characteristics | n (%) |
| AJCC 2010 T stage | |
| T1 | 3 (2) |
| T2a | 74 (43) |
| T2b | 14 (8) |
| T2c | 16 (9) |
| T3a | 49 (28) |
| T3b | 17 (10) |
| Gleason score (median) | 7 (3-9) |
| Initial PSA (median) | 14 ng/dL (2-100 ng/dL) |
| D’Amico risk group | |
| Intermediate | 52 (30) |
| High | 121 (70) |
| Perineural invasion | |
| Absent | 103 (60) |
| Present | 56 (32) |
| Unknown | 14 (8) |
| Percent positive core biopsy percentage | |
| ≤ 50 % | 76 (44) |
| > 50% | 59 (34) |
| Unknown | 38 (22) |
| Radiotherapy dose | |
| 736 Gy | 145 (84) |
| 76 Gy | 16 (16) |
Table 2 Multivariate analysis for independent predictors of biochemical failure free survival
| P value | HR | 95%CI for HR | ||
| Lower | Upper | |||
| LHRHa type | 0.757 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.24E+19 |
| D'Amico risk group (ref: intermediate) | 0.397 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.89E+00 |
| AJCC 2010 T stage (ref: T1) | 0.953 | |||
| T2a | 0.909 | 2869.3 | 0.0 | 2.85E+62 |
| T2b | 0.915 | 1646.5 | 0.0 | 1.64E+62 |
| T2c | 0.912 | 2150.3 | 0.0 | 2.14E+62 |
| T3a | 0.91 | 2583.9 | 0.0 | 2.57E+62 |
| T3b | 0.908 | 3108.0 | 0.0 | 3.10E+62 |
| Gleason score (ref: ≤ 6) | 0.799 | |||
| 7 | 0.932 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.99E+00 |
| ≥ 8 | 0.564 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.71E+00 |
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for two cut-off values of castrate testosterone levels
| AUC | SE | P value | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| Castrate level testosteron (≤ 20) | 0.628 | 0.049 | 0.011 | 63.6% | 62.0% |
| Castrate level testosteron (< 50) | 0.582 | 0.052 | 0.107 | 31.8% | 84.5% |
Table 4 Comparison of studies analyzing the effect of castrate testosterone levels in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation treatment and definitive radiotherapy
| Bryant et al[15] | Nabid et al[16] | Current study | |
| Time | 2000-2015 | 2000-2010 | 1998-2011 |
| Patient number | 764 | 796 | 173 |
| Hormone treatment | ADT+/- AA | ADT+/- AA | ADT+AA |
| Follow up (yr) | 5.27 | 9.15 | 10.4 |
| RT dose | Unknown | Unknown | 73.4-76 Gy |
| RT technique | Unknown | Unknown | 3DCRT-IMRT |
| Biochemical relapse rate | |||
| < 20 ng/dL | 18.3% (10 yr) | 20.8% | 17% (10 year) |
| 20-49 ng/dL | 28.1% (10 yr) | 24.9% | 35% (10 year) |
- Citation: Ozyigit G, Hurmuz P, Yuce D, Akyol F. Prognostic significance of castrate testosterone levels for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10(8): 283-292
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v10/i8/283.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v10.i8.283
