Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2024; 15(4): 468-471
Published online Apr 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i4.468
Understanding the role of transmembrane 9 superfamily member 1 in bladder cancer pathogenesis
Venkata Krishna Vamsi Gade, Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
Budhi Singh Yadav, Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
ORCID number: Budhi Singh Yadav (0000-0001-6185-4139).
Author contributions: Both the authors contributed equally by data collection, manuscript writing, editing and approval.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Budhi Singh Yadav, MD, Professor, Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh 160012, India. drbudhi@gmail.com
Received: December 20, 2023
Peer-review started: December 20, 2023
First decision: February 2, 2024
Revised: February 16, 2024
Accepted: March 6, 2024
Article in press: March 6, 2024
Published online: April 24, 2024
Processing time: 124 Days and 4.3 Hours

Abstract

In this editorial we comment on the article by Wei et al, published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Clinical Oncology. The authors investigated the role of Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 1 (TM9SF1) protein in bladder cancer (BC) carcinogenesis. Lentiviral vectors were used to achieve silencing or overexpression of TM9SF1 gene in three BC cell lines. These cell lines were then subject to cell counting kit 8, wound-healing assay, transwell assay, and flow cytometry. Proliferation, migration, and invasion of BC cells were increased in cell lines subjected to TM9SF1 overexpression. TM9SF1 silencing inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion of BC cells. The authors conclude that TM9SF1 may be an oncogene in bladder cancer pathogenesis.

Key Words: Urinary bladder cancer; Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 1 gene cell line; Lentiviral vectors; Wound healing assay; Oncogene; Proliferation; Migration

Core Tip: The scratch wound healing assay and transwell assay showed significantly improved cellular migration in the Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 1 (TM9SF1) overexpression group. TM9SF1 silencing inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion of bladder cancer (BC) cells. TM9SF1 can be used as a therapeutic molecular target. The importance of TM9SF1 as an oncogene and its use as a therapeutic target would ultimately depend on the prevalence of the mutation in BC tissues and replication of in vitro activity in tumour tissue.



INTRODUCTION

In a novel basic study, Wei et al[1] investigated the role of Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 1 (TM9SF1) protein in bladder cancer (BC) carcinogenesis[1]. Lentiviral vectors were used to achieve silencing or overexpression of TM9SF1 gene in three BC cell lines. These cell lines were then subject to Cell counting kit 8 (CCK8), wound-healing assay, transwell assay, and flow cytometry. Proliferation, migration, and invasion of BC cells were increased in cell lines subjected to TM9SF1 overexpression. Whereas TM9SF1 silencing inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion of BC cells. The authors concluded that TM9SF1 may be an oncogene in BC pathogenesis.

BC is the most common cancer of the urinary tract with more than 500000 cases diagnosed in 2020 worldwide[2]. Non muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) comprise around 60% of all cases. Although NMIBC has an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 71%-90%, they have a 15%-30% recurrence rate and up to a 10% rate of progression to muscle invasive BC (MIBC)[3]. MIBC has a 5 year survival rate of 60%-70% with patients having an aggressive clinical course as compared to NMIBC[4]. Patients of MIBC develop distant metastases in up to 29% of cases[5]. However, systemic therapy protocols in BC have remained largely unchanged in the last 2 decades[6,7]. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to their use in advanced BC. Randomised trials however, have only demonstrated a modest survival advantage with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced BC[8,9]. Therefore, there is a pressing need to identify new molecular targets in BC through basic research.

Increasing age, tobacco smoke, Schistosoma infection, exposure to aromatic amines and polycyclic hydrocarbons, ionizing radiation and phenacetin-containing analgesics are all proven risk factors for BC development[10]. A review of the genomic landscape of urinary BC shows that polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferase 2 and glutathione S-transferase-μ1 genes confer an increased risk of BC[11,12]. Other genes suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis include MYC, TP63, TERT, FGFR3, PSCA, UGT1A1, TACC3 and APOBEC3A[13]. TM9SF1, first identified in 1997, is a transmembrane protein localised to the autophagosomal and lysosomal membranes in the cytoplasm. TM9SF1 was identified to be one of the 17 common differentially expressed genes in BC samples but its precise role in BC pathogenesis was unclear.

In this study by Wei et al[1], stable transfectants overexpressing TM9SF1 were successfully constructed in all three BC cell lines which was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The CCK8 assay showed that the proliferation rate of BC cells in the TM9SF1 overexpression group was significantly higher than in the control group. The scratch wound healing assay and transwell assay showed significantly improved cellular migration in the TM9SF1 overexpression group. Matrix gel testing and flow cytometry showed TM9SF1 cells were more likely to demonstrate cell invasion and transition to G2/M phase. When these tests were performed in transfectants with silenced TM9SF1, the authors noted reduced cellular proliferation, invasion, migration and G1 cell block. With these findings TM9SF1 has been proposed to be a novel oncogene in BC pathogenesis.

In addition to BC, TM9SF1 has been found to be overexpressed in esophageal and cervical cancer with a speculated link to poorer survival and recurrence rates in some preclinical studies[14,15]. Its role as an oncogene might be due to its effects on the G1 phase. The precise molecular interaction of TM9SF1 with cell cycle proteins needs further investigation. The synergistic interaction of TM9SF1 with proteins regulating the epithelial mesenchymal transition such as EBAG9 might explain the increased invasion and migration in TM9SF1 overexpressed cells[16].

The inhibition of cellular proliferation, migration and invasion caused by TM9SF1 silencing hints at its pro-oncogenic role. Future directions might involve correlation of stage, grade and histology of BC patients with TM9SF1 overexpression. The prognostic and predictive value of TM9SF1 overexpression in BC would first need to be established in a retrospective study. For instance, while point mutation of the FGFR3 gene is observed in 60%-70% of NMIBC cases, it is only detected in 5%-10% of MIBC cases[17]. The upregulation of EGFR is observed in 20% of NMIBC cases, but it can be seen in up to 50% of MIBC cases[18]. Response of TM9SF1 overexpressing BC to standard chemotherapy regimens and radiation needs investigation.

The study also highlights the possible utility of TM9SF1 as a therapeutic molecular target. Since transfectants with silenced TM9SF1 had reduced cellular proliferation, invasion, migration and G1 arrest; therapeutic molecules inhibiting TM9SF1 might improve BC outcomes. The use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy is quickly gaining acceptance in BC treatment. Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) is one of the oldest forms of immunotherapy used in BC treatment. Its intravesical use is recommended in intermediate and high-risk NMIBC after transurethral resection of bladder tumour. BCG acts on BC cells via direct and indirect effects. Direct cytotoxicity of BC cells occurs due to apoptosis mediated by TLR7 and cellular necrosis mediated by HMGB7. Indirect effects occur due to the internalization of BCG followed by signal transduction leading to cytokine release that ultimately results in modulation of innate and acquired immune response[19].

This study by Wei et al[1] was based on in vitro cell line experiments. In a large meta-analysis of genomic hybridisation studies, there was a high degree of correlation between mutation patterns in tissue and cell line groups of similar histology. However, quantitatively, cell lines showed higher locus-specific and cell line-specific aberrations when compared with tissue samples[20]. Microarray studies in other tumour types such as in cervical cancer have shown that though major pathogenic mutations are reflected in cell lines, there were also several notable discordant genes forming major clusters. The reason for such discordance has not been definitively established and has been speculated to be due to changes in the tumour microenvironment[21]. Therefore, TM9SF1 expression patterns and behaviour in BC tissue samples warrants further investigation.

The importance of TM9SF1 as an oncogene and its use as a therapeutic target would ultimately depend on the prevalence of the mutation in BC tissues and replication of invitro activity in tumour tissue.

CONCLUSION

The importance of TM9SF1 as an oncogene and its use as a therapeutic target would ultimately depend on the prevalence of the expression in BC tissues and replication of in vitro activity in tumour tissue.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Oncology

Country/Territory of origin: India

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Yang LY, China S-Editor: Li L L-Editor: A P-Editor: Yuan YY

References
1.  Wei L, Wang SS, Huang ZG, He RQ, Luo JY, Li B, Cheng JW, Wu KJ, Zhou YH, Liu S, Li SH, Chen G. TM9SF1 promotes bladder cancer cell growth and infiltration. World J Clin Oncol. 2024;15:302-316.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
2.  Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53391]  [Article Influence: 8898.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (124)]
3.  Kamat AM, Sylvester RJ, Böhle A, Palou J, Lamm DL, Brausi M, Soloway M, Persad R, Buckley R, Colombel M, Witjes JA. Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the International Bladder Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1935-1944.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 204]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 276]  [Article Influence: 34.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7029]  [Article Influence: 7029.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Manig L, Käsmann L, Janssen S, Rades D. Predicting Survival After Irradiation of Metastases from Transitional Carcinoma of the Bladder. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:6663-6665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Yadav BS, Ghoshal S, Sharma SC. Outcome following radical cystectomy and bladder-preservation therapy in patients with invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder. Indian J Urol. 2008;24:48-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Dracham CB, Kumar N, Kumar S, Elangovan A, Yadav BS, Mavuduru RS, Lal A, Gupta PK, Kapoor R. A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by organ preservation in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Asian J Urol. 2022;9:318-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, Fradet Y, Lee JL, Fong L, Vogelzang NJ, Climent MA, Petrylak DP, Choueiri TK, Necchi A, Gerritsen W, Gurney H, Quinn DI, Culine S, Sternberg CN, Mai Y, Poehlein CH, Perini RF, Bajorin DF; KEYNOTE-045 Investigators. Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1015-1026.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2051]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2481]  [Article Influence: 354.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, Caserta C, Valderrama BP, Gurney H, Kalofonos H, Radulović S, Demey W, Ullén A, Loriot Y, Sridhar SS, Tsuchiya N, Kopyltsov E, Sternberg CN, Bellmunt J, Aragon-Ching JB, Petrylak DP, Laliberte R, Wang J, Huang B, Davis C, Fowst C, Costa N, Blake-Haskins JA, di Pietro A, Grivas P. Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1218-1230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 509]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 813]  [Article Influence: 203.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Janković S, Radosavljević V. Risk factors for bladder cancer. Tumori. 2007;93:4-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Marcus PM, Vineis P, Rothman N. NAT2 slow acetylation and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 22 case-control studies conducted in the general population. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:115-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Yu C, Hequn C, Longfei L, Long W, Zhi C, Feng Z, Jinbo C, Chao L, Xiongbing Z. GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms are associated with increased bladder cancer risk: Evidence from updated meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3246-3258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Nordentoft I, Lamy P, Birkenkamp-Demtröder K, Shumansky K, Vang S, Hornshøj H, Juul M, Villesen P, Hedegaard J, Roth A, Thorsen K, Høyer S, Borre M, Reinert T, Fristrup N, Dyrskjøt L, Shah S, Pedersen JS, Ørntoft TF. Mutational context and diverse clonal development in early and late bladder cancer. Cell Rep. 2014;7:1649-1663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Liu K, Jiao YL, Shen LQ, Chen P, Zhao Y, Li MX, Gu BL, Lan ZJ, Ruan HJ, Liu QW, Xu FB, Yuan X, Qi YJ, Gao SG. A Prognostic Model Based on mRNA Expression Analysis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:823619.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Huang Z, Wang H, Liu M, Li X, Zhu L, Dong L, Wang G, Li F, Li Q. Expression profiling analysis of autophagy-related genes in cervical cancer. 2021 Preprint. Research Square. 2021;1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Miyazaki T, Ikeda K, Sato W, Horie-Inoue K, Inoue S. Extracellular vesicle-mediated EBAG9 transfer from cancer cells to tumor microenvironment promotes immune escape and tumor progression. Oncogenesis. 2018;7:7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Ascione CM, Napolitano F, Esposito D, Servetto A, Belli S, Santaniello A, Scagliarini S, Crocetto F, Bianco R, Formisano L. Role of FGFR3 in bladder cancer: Treatment landscape and future challenges. Cancer Treat Rev. 2023;115:102530.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Hashmi AA, Hussain ZF, Irfan M, Khan EY, Faridi N, Naqvi H, Khan A, Edhi MM. Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) over expression in urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder. BMC Urol. 2018;18:59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Han J, Gu X, Li Y, Wu Q. Mechanisms of BCG in the treatment of bladder cancer-current understanding and the prospect. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 100]  [Article Influence: 25.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Greshock J, Nathanson K, Martin AM, Zhang L, Coukos G, Weber BL, Zaks TZ. Cancer cell lines as genetic models of their parent histology: analyses based on array comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 2007;67:3594-3600.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Wan F, Miao X, Quraishi I, Kennedy V, Creek KE, Pirisi L. Gene expression changes during HPV-mediated carcinogenesis: a comparison between an in vitro cell model and cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:32-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]