BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 10, 2016; 7(5): 406-413
Published online Oct 10, 2016. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i5.406
Factors associated with cervical cancer screening in a safety net population
Meredith A Heberer, Ian K Komenaka, Jesse N Nodora, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Sonal G Gandhi, Lauren E Welch, Marcia E Bouton, Paula Aristizabal, Barry D Weiss, Maria Elena Martinez
Meredith A Heberer, Ian K Komenaka, Lauren E Welch, Marcia E Bouton, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85008, United States
Ian K Komenaka, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
Jesse N Nodora, Maria Elena Martinez, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Mel and Enid Zuckerman Arizona College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
Sonal G Gandhi, New Horizon Women’s Care, Chandler, AZ 62691, United States
Paula Aristizabal, Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
Barry D Weiss, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
Author contributions: All the authors contribute to the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Maricopa Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent statement: Waiver of informed consent was obtained from the Maricopa Medical Center Institutional Review Board for this study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors report no conflicts of interest.
Data sharing statement: No data were created so no data are available.
Correspondence to: Ian K Komenaka, MD, Maricopa Medical Center, Hogan Building, 2nd Floor, 2601 E Roosevelt Street, Phoenix, AZ 85008, United States. komenaka@hotmail.com
Telephone: +1-602-3445368 Fax: +1-602-3441299
Received: February 19, 2016
Peer-review started: February 22, 2016
First decision: March 25, 2016
Revised: June 18, 2016
Accepted: August 11, 2016
Article in press: August 13, 2016
Published online: October 10, 2016
Processing time: 232 Days and 14.2 Hours
Abstract
AIM

To identify factors associated with Papanicolaou-smear (Pap-smear) cervical cancer screening rates in a safety net population.

METHODS

From January 2012 to May 2013, the use of Pap-smear was determined for all patients seen at the breast clinic in a safety net hospital. Health literacy assessment was performed using the validated Newest Vital Sign. The records of patients were reviewed to determine if they had undergone Pap-smears for cervical cancer screening. Sociodemographic information was collected included age, education, monthly income, race/ethnicity, employment, insurance status, and primary care provider of the patient. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to determine factors associated with utilization of Pap-smears. Crude and adjusted odds ratios derived from multivariate logistic regression models were calculated as well as the associated 95%CIs and P-values.

RESULTS

Overall, 39% had Pap-smears in the prior 15 mo, 1377 consecutive women were seen during the study period and their records were reviewed. Significantly more patients with adequate health literacy underwent Pap-smears as compared to those with limited health literacy (59% vs 34%, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, patients with adequate health literacy, younger patients, and those with later age of first live birth were more likely to undergo Pap-smears. Patients whose primary care providers were gynecologists were also significantly more likely to have Pap-smears compared to other specialties (P < 0.0001). Patients younger than 21 years or older than 65 years underwent screening less frequently (11% and 11%, respectively) than those 21-64 years (41%, P < 0.0001). Race, ethnicity, language, and insurance status were not associated with Pap-smear screening rates.

CONCLUSION

Patient health literacy and primary care physician were associated with Pap-smear utilization. Development of interventions to target low health literacy populations could improve cervical cancer screening.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Health literacy; Prevention; Screening; Pap-smear

Core tip: Patient health literacy and type of primary care physician were associated with Papanicolaou-smear utilization. Development of interventions to target low health literacy populations could improve cervical cancer screening and therefore improve screening in populations most at risk for cervical cancer.

Write to the Help Desk