Published online May 24, 2023. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i5.190
Peer-review started: September 18, 2022
First decision: November 11, 2022
Revised: November 23, 2022
Accepted: April 25, 2023
Article in press: April 25, 2023
Published online: May 24, 2023
Processing time: 242 Days and 9.1 Hours
The therapy of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction continues to be one of the largest problems in clinical practice. Numerous studies on colonic stenting for neoplastic colonic obstruction have been reported in the last decades. Thereby the role of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in the treatment of malignant colonic obstruction has become better defined. However, numerous prospective and retrospective investigations have highlighted serious concerns about a possible worse outcome after endoscopic colorectal stenting as a bridge to surgery, particularly in case of perforation. This review analyzes the most recent evidence in order to highlight pros and cons of SEMS placement in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction.
Core Tip: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) should be considered as a primary option in palliative treatment of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. In patients with conceivably curable left-sided colon cancer, SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery should be carefully discussed, specifically focusing on lower risk and lower permanent stoma rates, but potentially higher recurrence rates when compared to surgery. In this scenario the endoscopic expertise has a significant impact on the complication rate.
