Published online Jan 5, 2021. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v12.i1.13
Peer-review started: October 20, 2020
First decision: October 27, 2020
Revised: November 26, 2020
Accepted: December 4, 2020
Article in press: December 4, 2020
Published online: January 5, 2021
Processing time: 77 Days and 8.8 Hours
Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) experience abdominal pain and irregularities of stool form and passage frequency. The prevalence ranges from 9%-23%, and IBS imposes profound burdens on patients, physicians, and the healthcare system. The pathophysiology is poorly understood.
Faecal retention is suspected to play a role in IBS symptoms. However, few colonic transit studies exist, and none have included simultaneous determination of colonic faecal content. Such information would likely have implications for choice of therapeutic decisions.
The present case-control study was performed to compare colonic transit time (CTT) and faecal load between IBS-patients and healthy controls. We further aimed to compare these parameters in patients before and after treatment with a prokinetic regime.
CTT and faecal load were measured by performing a marker study. IBS-patients swallowed a capsule containing 24 radiopaque markers, and abdominal X-rays were taken after 48 h and 96 h. Control subjects ingested 24 markers at the same time for 6 d, followed by an X-ray on day 7. For both groups, CTT was calculated in hours, and a faecal load score was estimated.
Compared to 44 healthy controls, 140 IBS-patients exhibited a significantly prolonged mean CTT (45.48 h vs 24.75 h, P < 0.001) and a significantly greater mean faecal loading scores in each colonic segment (P < 0.001). After the intervention, the mean CTT in IBS-patients was reduced from 45.48 h to 34.50 h (P > 0.05), with the post-treatment CTT not significantly differing from the CTT among control subjects (P > 0.05). Moreover, following treatment, half of the patients were relieved from bloating, and the majority no longer experienced abdominal pain and had achieved a consistent daily stool.
IBS-patients were examined by using a new method comprising the simultaneous determination of CTT and faecal load. Our results showed a significantly prolonged CTT and significantly heavier faecal loading in IBS-patients compared to healthy control persons. These findings may contribute to the IBS symptoms, which were relieved to some degree following treatment with a prokinetic regime. Studies are needed to examine further the association between faecal retention and symptoms.
Simultaneous measurement of CTT and faecal load may serve as a diagnostic tool for investigating IBS-patients and could also be extended for use in patients with other bowel disorders. This method may also be useful for monitoring the effects of different treatment regimens.