Published online Feb 6, 2017. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i1.67
Peer-review started: October 19, 2016
First decision: November 22, 2016
Revised: November 24, 2016
Accepted: January 2, 2017
Article in press: January 3, 2017
Published online: February 6, 2017
Processing time: 94 Days and 23.9 Hours
The survey ascertains perceptions and describes current practice of clinicians regarding medication non-adherence in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Gastroenterologists, trainees and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialist nurses from the United Kingdom were invited to a web based survey collecting data on clinician demographics, patient volume and level of interest in IBD. Respondents were asked to estimate non-adherence levels and report use of screening tools and interventions to improve adherence.
Non-adherence was seen as an infrequent problem by 57% of 98 respondents. Levels of non-adherence were estimated lower than evidence suggests by 29% for mesalazine (5ASA), 26% for immunomodulators (IMM) and 21% for biologics (BIOL). Respondents reporting non-adherence as a frequent problem were more likely to report adherence levels in line with evidence (5ASA P < 0.001; IMM P = 0.012; BIOL P = 0.015). While 80% regarded screening as important only 25% screen regularly (40% of these with validated assessment tools). Respondents stated forgetfulness, beliefs about necessity of medication and not immediately apparent benefits as the main reasons for non-adherence. Patient counselling on benefits and risks of medication was a commonly used intervention.
Clinicians treating IBD patients frequently underestimate non-adherence and use of validated screening tools is infrequent. Most respondents identified the main factors associated with non-adherence in line with evidence and often counselled patients accordingly. Professional education should focus more on non-adherence practice to avoid adverse treatment outcomes associated with non-adherence.
Core tip: Non-adherence to maintenance medication is a very common phenomenon occurring in up to 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This survey demonstrates that many clinicians underestimate the extent of non-adherence and screening for non-adherence is infrequent and not systematic. The lack of evidence for any intervention to improve adherence is reflected by the participants divergent practice to improve adherence. There is an urgent need for further clinician education on non-adherence and robustly tested interventions that are capable of improving adherence.