BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2026; 17(3): 119031
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.119031
Beyond the gut microbe: Rethinking infection, microbiome harmony, and the one-health continuum
Sumit Rai, Prasan Kumar Panda
Sumit Rai, Department of Clinical Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri 522503, Andhra Pradesh, India
Prasan Kumar Panda, Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Disease Division), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarākhand, India
Author contributions: Rai S and Panda PK searched the literature, drafted the manuscript statistically, critically reviewed it, and approved the study.
AI contribution statement: No part of the manuscript was AI-generated. ChatGPT was only used for language editing and polishing. No AI was involved in data analysis, image creation or reference generation.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Prasan Kumar Panda, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Disease Division), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 409, College Block, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarākhand, India. motherprasanna@rediffmail.com
Received: January 19, 2026
Revised: February 25, 2026
Accepted: May 13, 2026
Published online: September 5, 2026
Processing time: 223 Days and 15.1 Hours
Abstract

Emerging microbial discoveries have transformed infectious-disease science, yet detection alone does not equate to pathogenicity. Human health is mediated by complex microbiomes, and dysbiosis can convert commensals into opportunists, a concept captured by the “pathobiome”. Across infectious-disease literature, gaps remain in integrating ecological context, host response, longitudinal data, and one-health perspectives. Misinterpretation of culture or sequencing results drives antimicrobial misuse, resistance, and ecological harm. We propose an eight-principle framework to distinguish pathogen from non-pathogen: (1) Clinical localization; (2) Temporal host response; (3) Exclusion of alternative sources; (4) Ecological context; (5) Host susceptibility; (6) Contamination assessment; (7) Transparent reporting of methods and quantitative thresholds; and (8) Ethical use of diagnostic technology. Adoption of this framework to any specialty, including gut, promotes accurate infection identification, stewardship, and transparency. Expanding perspective from the individual microbiome to planetary health, this approach aligns discovery with ecological and ethical responsibility, transforming infectious-disease practice from reactionary treatment to preservation of microbial harmony.

Keywords: Microbiome; Pathobiome; Diagnostic stewardship; One Health; Pathogen identification

Core Tip: Advances in culture and sequencing have expanded microbial detection, but presence does not equal pathogenicity. Many infections reflect disruption of the human microbiome rather than invasion by a novel pathogen. Misinterpretation of isolates drives antimicrobial misuse, resistance, and ecological harm. This opinion proposes an eight-question, clinically grounded framework to distinguish pathogens from non-pathogens by integrating host site and response, ecological context, contamination assessment, and transparent reporting. Applying this approach aligns infectious-disease practice with diagnostic stewardship, one health principles, and preservation of microbial harmony from individual patients to planetary health.

Write to the Help Desk