Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2014; 6(5): 210-217
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210
Number of patients | Number of intervals based on scan length + average of intervals, max, min, mid-scan length | Number of diameters (AP, Lat, AP + Lat, √ AP * Lat) on transverse images and localizer | Number of SSDE | Number of calculated SSDE in all patients |
4 | 8 + 4 | 96 | 96 | 384 |
24 | 9 + 4 | 104 | 104 | 2496 |
18 | 10 + 4 | 112 | 112 | 2016 |
4 | 11 + 4 | 120 | 120 | 480 |
Total = 50 | Total = 5376 |
AP (transverse images) | Lat (transverse images) | AP (localizer) | Lat (localizer) | |
Female | 25.5 ± 3.6 (18.1-31.3) | 37.0 ± 4.5 (29.4-46.9) | 27.4 ± 4.6 (19.9-36.1) | 39.1 ± 5.6 (27.8-48.0) |
Male | 28.2 ± 4.0 (23.0-40.9) | 37.7 ± 3.9 (30.1-46.2) | 30.4 ± 4.9 (22.7-46.2) | 40.0 ± 5.4 (29.2-49.8) |
P value | < 0.0100 | 0.2000 | < 0.0100 | 0.2000 |
< 90 kg | 24.4 ± 2.4 (18.1-29.9) | 34.4 ± 2.8 (28.8-40.7) | 26.0 ± 3.0 (18.1-32.9) | 36.0 ± 4.2 (27.8-46.6) |
≥ 90 kg | 29.7 ± 3.4 (26.0-40.8) | 39.6 ± 2.7 (35.7-44.9) | 32.3 ± 4.2 (27.0-48.7) | 42.4 ± 3.3 (35.5-46.2) |
P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
DAP | DL | DSum | DEff | |||||
Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | |
Localizer radiograph | ||||||||
Average | 0.20, 0.46 | 0.06 ± 0.14 | -0.17, 0.55 | 0.12 ± 0.18 | -0.26, 0.50 | 0.04 ± 0.17 | -0.25, 0.47 | 0.04 ± 0.16 |
Maximum | -0.32, 0.01 | -0.21 ± 0.08 | -0.13, 0.50 | 0.08 ± 0.17 | -0.28, 0.27 | 0.01 ± 0.16 | -0.30, 0.43 | 0.00 ± 0.16 |
Minimum | -0.26, 0.11 | -0.11 ± 0.09 | -0.17, 0.65 | 0.26 ± 0.23 | -0.27, 0.26 | 0.03 ± 0.19 | -0.27, 0.59 | 0.04 ± 0.19 |
Mid location | -0.30, 0.08 | -0.15 ± 0.10 | -0.17, 0.69 | 0.13 ± 0.23 | -0.22, 0.56 | 0.16 ± 0.23 | -0.20, 0.64 | 0.12 ± 0.17 |
Transverse computed tomography images | ||||||||
Average | -0.23, 0.59 | 0.13 ± 0.14 | -0.13, 0.50 | 0.15 ± 0.16 | -0.27, 0.50 | 0.11 ± 0.15 | -0.26, 0.53 | 0.11 ± 0.15 |
Maximum | -0.25, 0.67 | 0.18 ± 0.19 | -0.13, 0.50 | 0.08 ± 0.16 | -0.17, 0.59 | 0.08 ± 0.15 | -0.29, 0.53 | 0.10 ± 0.17 |
Minimum | -0.16, 0.66 | 0.13 ± 0.16 | -0.06, 0.70 | 0.31 ± 0.19 | -0.20, 0.61 | 0.11 ± 0.17 | -0.14, 0.59 | 0.16 ± 0.15 |
Mid location | -0.25, 0.74 | -0.10 ± 0.17 | -0.17, 0.55 | 0.19 ± 0.20 | -0.12, 0.56 | 0.16 ± 0.14 | -0.19, 0.64 | 0.10 ± 0.23 |
- Citation: Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Padole A, Saini A, Blake MA, Kalra MK. Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images? World J Radiol 2014; 6(5): 210-217
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v6/i5/210.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210