Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2026; 18(7): 120995
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.120995
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.120995
Table 1 Age distribution of study participants
| Age group (yrs) | n (%) |
| 20–30 | 62 (68.9) |
| 31–40 | 28 (31.1) |
| mean ± SD | 27.8 ± 4.6 |
| Median (25th–75th percentile) | 27.5 (24–32) |
| Range | 20–37 |
Table 2 Obstetric characteristics of study participants
| Characteristic | n (%) |
| Gravida | |
| 1 | 35 (38.9) |
| 2 | 33 (36.7) |
| 3 | 20 (22.2) |
| 4 | 2 (2.2) |
| Parity | |
| 0 | 38 (42.2) |
| 1 | 32 (35.6) |
| 2 | 19 (21.1) |
| 3 | 1 (1.1) |
| Living children | |
| 0 | 38 (42.2) |
| 1 | 34 (37.8) |
| 2 | 17 (18.9) |
| 3 | 1 (1.1) |
| Abortions | |
| 0 | 78 (86.7) |
| 1 | 12 (13.3) |
| Gestational age at enrolment (weeks) | |
| mean ± SD | 19.6 ± 0.7 |
| Median (25th–75th percentile) | 19.9 (19.1–20) |
| Range | 17–23 |
Table 3 Distribution of ophthalmic artery Doppler indices according to receiver operating characteristic-derived cut-off values (n = 90)
| Parameter | Category | n (%) | mean ± SD |
| RI | Low RI | 46 (51.1) | 0.71 ± 0.10 |
| Not low RI | 44 (48.9) | ||
| P1 | Low P1 | 4 (4.4) | 61.9 ± 14.6 cm/s |
| Not low P1 | 86 (95.6) | ||
| PI | Low PI | 29 (32.2) | 2.0 ± 0.3 |
| Not low PI | 61 (67.8) | ||
| P2 | High P2 | 78 (86.7) | 33.9 ± 10.2 cm/s |
| Not high P2 | 12 (13.3) | ||
| PR | High PR | 16 (17.8) | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
| Not high PR | 74 (82.2) |
Table 4 Distribution of normotensive participants and those with preeclampsia
| Outcome | n (%) |
| Normotensive | 82 (91.1) |
| Preeclampsia | 8 (8.9) |
| Total | 90 (100.0) |
Table 5 Association between ophthalmic artery Doppler indices and the subsequent development of preeclampsia
| Parameter | Category | Normotensive, n (%) | Preeclampsia, n (%) | Total, n (%) | P value (distribution) | mean ± SD (preeclampsia) | mean ± SD (normotensive) | P value (mean) |
| RI | Not low RI | 44 (100) | 0 (0) | 44 (100) | 0.006 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.004 |
| Low RI | 38 (82.61) | 8 (17.39) | 46 (100) | |||||
| P1 | Not low P1 | 80 (93.02) | 6 (6.98) | 86 (100) | 0.038 | 56.8 ± 17.9 | 62.4 ± 14.3 | 0.307 |
| Low P1 | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | 4 (100) | |||||
| PI | Not low PI | 59 (96.72) | 2 (3.28) | 61 (100) | 0.012 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 0.0003 |
| Low PI | 23 (79.31) | 6 (20.69) | 29 (100) | |||||
| P2 | Not high P2 | 12 (100) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0.591 | 39.9 ± 11.4 | 33.3 ± 10.0 | 0.085 |
| High P2 | 70 (89.74) | 8 (10.26) | 78 (100) | |||||
| PR | Not high PR | 74 (100) | 0 (0) | 74 (100) | < 0.0001 | 0.70 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | < 0.0001 |
| High PR | 8 (50) | 8 (50) | 16 (100) |
Table 6 Diagnostic performance of ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters for predicting preeclampsia
| Parameter | Low RI | Low P1 | Low PI | High P2 | High PR |
| Sensitivity (95%CI), % | 100 (63.1–100) | 25.0 (3.2–65.1) | 75.0 (34.9–96.8) | 100 (63.1–100) | 100 (63.1–100) |
| Specificity (95%CI), % | 53.7 (42.3–64.8) | 97.6 (91.5–99.7) | 71.9 (60.9–81.3) | 14.6 (7.8–24.2) | 90.2 (81.7–95.7) |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.77 (0.7–0.9) | 0.6 (0.5–0.7) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | 0.6 (0.5–0.7) | 0.9 (0.8–0.9) |
| Positive predictive value (95%CI), % | 17.4 (7.8–31.4) | 50.0 (6.8–93.2) | 20.7 (7.9–39.7) | 10.3 (4.5–19.2) | 50.0 (24.6–75.4) |
| Negative predictive value (95%CI), % | 100 (91.9–100) | 93.0 (85.4–97.4) | 96.7 (88.7–99.6) | 100.0 (73.5–100.0) | 100.0 (95.1–100.0) |
| Diagnostic accuracy, % | 57.8 | 91.1 | 72.2 | 22.2 | 91.1% |
- Citation: Dhiman R, Nayyar N, Takkar P, Sood D, Shukla A. Predictive value of second-trimester ophthalmic artery Doppler for identifying women at risk for preeclampsia. World J Radiol 2026; 18(7): 120995
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i7/120995.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.120995