Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2026; 18(5): 119048
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119048
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119048
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients undergoing abdominal photon-counting computed tomography and energy-integrating detector computed tomography, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)
| Variable | PCCT | EID-CT | P value |
| Gender | 0.8222 | ||
| Male | 17 (42.5) | 19 (47.5) | |
| Female | 23 (57.5) | 21 (52.5) | |
| Age | 42.58 ± 15.49 | 47.68± 12.0 | 0.056 |
| Height (cm) | 165.85 ± 8.66 | 163.15 ± 7.71 | 0.145 |
| Weight (kg) | 61.00 (57.50-72.00) | 65.00 (56.50-73.00) | 0.769 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.49 ± 3.43 | 24.39 ± 4.28 | 0.299 |
Table 2 Comparison of radiation dose between abdominal photon-counting computed tomography and energy-integrating detector computed tomography, median (interquartile range)
| Variable | PCCT | EID-CT | P value |
| CTDIvol (mGy) | 3.78 (3.20-4.17) | 7.15 (5.85-8.57) | < 0.001 |
| DLP (mGy × cm) | 103.15 (89.23-122.51) | 201.60 (161.15-227.68) | < 0.001 |
| ED (mSv) | 1.55 (1.34-1.84) | 3.02 (2.42-3.42) | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver agreement
| Variable | Intraclass correlation coefficient | 95% confidence interval | P value |
| meanliver | 0.916 | 0.871-0.945 | < 0.001 |
| SDliver | 0.892 | 0.837-0.929 | < 0.001 |
| meanfat | 0.899 | 0.851-0.936 | < 0.001 |
| SDfat | 0.896 | 0.838-0.932 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of objective and subjective image quality parameters between abdominal photon-counting computed tomography and energy-integrating detector computed tomography, median (interquartile range)
| Variable | PCCT | EID-CT | P value |
| meanliver | 65.95 (62.60-68.80) | 61.35 (55.77-65.08) | 0.001 |
| SDliver | 11.60 (10.85-12.45) | 18.60 (16.62-20.32) | < 0.001 |
| meanfat | -108.35 (-111.72 to -103.78) | -106.15 (-110.78 to -99.08) | 0.192 |
| SDfat | 11.75 (11.00-12.50) | 14.30 (13.03-16.35) | < 0.001 |
| SNR | 5.57 (5.02-6.32) | 3.26 (2.71-3.76) | < 0.001 |
| CNR | 10.26 (9.76-11.36) | 7.14 (6.21-7.67) | < 0.001 |
| EII | 71.99 (52.96-93.39) | 17.38 (12.71-20.75) | < 0.001 |
| SNR/(CDTI)1/2 | 2.90 (2.46-3.53) | 1.21 (0.97-1.47) | < 0.001 |
| CNR/(CDTI)1/2 | 5.46 (4.77-6.36) | 2.62 (2.36-2.98) | < 0.001 |
| NR | 1.00 (0.94-1.05) | 1.29 (1.10-1.48) | < 0.001 |
| Likert | < 0.001 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 29 | |
| 4 | 8 | 7 | |
| 5 | 31 | 4 |
- Citation: Zhu TT, Zhu XY, Yang M, Liu WM, Yang WJ, Liu X. Photon-counting computed tomography enables low-dose, high-quality abdominal imaging: A comparative study with energy-integrating detector computed tomography. World J Radiol 2026; 18(5): 119048
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i5/119048.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119048