Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119205
Revised: February 9, 2026
Accepted: April 2, 2026
Published online: May 28, 2026
Processing time: 126 Days and 6.3 Hours
The fossa of Rosenmüller (RF) is a herniation of nasopharyngeal mucosa through a defect between the skull base and the superior-most fibers of the superior constrictor muscle. Its anatomy and relationships help explain symptoms com
To assess the anatomy of RF via two- and three-dimensional measurements and evaluate the findings according to demographic parameters.
Cone-beam computed tomography images from 500 Turkish patients were retrospectively assessed by two observers, each performing measurements twice. Images were acquired using a Planmeca Promax 3D Max system (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) (70-90 kVp; 9-10 mA; exposure time 10-15 seconds). Measure
The mean width was 4.21 ± 1.43 mm (median: 4.16; range: 1.17-11.09), and the mean depth was 12.82 ± 3.39 mm (median: 12.84; range: 4.79-25.86). The mean angle relative to the sagittal plane was 52.34° ± 9.11° (median: 51.40; range: 9.28-79.90). Volumetric analysis demonstrated a mean RF volume of 334.78 ± 329.93 mm3 (median: 210.67; range: 29.31-1632.76), indicating substantial interindividual variability. No statistically significant sex-related differences were identified in width (female: 4.20 ± 1.46 mm; male: 4.24 ± 1.41 mm; P = 0.885), depth (female: 12.82 ± 3.39 mm; male: 12.80 ± 3.44 mm; P = 0.973), or angle (female: 51.66° ± 9.75°; male: 53.52° ± 7.88°; P = 0.296). Similarly, volumetric measurements did not differ significantly between females and males (307.26 ± 304.78 mm3 vs 383.26 ± 368.99 mm3, respectively; P = 0.336). Intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement for all measurements (P < 0.001).
Cone-beam computed tomography may provide useful information for assessing the RF.
Core Tip: The fossa of Rosenmüller is a key anatomical region of the nasopharynx and represents the most frequent site of origin of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Despite its clinical significance, detailed three-dimensional morphometric data on this structure remain limited. In the present study, cone-beam computed tomography enabled accurate three-dimensional linear and volumetric evaluation of the fossa of Rosenmüller. The combined use of volumetric, surface area, and linear mea
- Citation: Kamburoğlu K, Sonmez G. Radiological assessment of the fossa of Rosenmüller using cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. World J Radiol 2026; 18(5): 119205
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i5/119205.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119205
The fossa of Rosenmüller (RF), also known as the pharyngeal recess, is a bilateral indentation of the lateral naso
The RF is of particular clinical importance because it is the most common site of origin for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a malignancy with often subtle early radiographic features that are critical to detect for optimal therapeutic outcomes[3]. This retrospective study aims to assess RF anatomy using two- and three-dimensional measurements and to evaluate these findings according to demographic parameters.
Approval for the present study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 500 Turkish patients aged 18-60 years were retrospectively selected from the digital database of Ankara University.
All scans were acquired using a ProMax 3D Max CBCT scanner (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) equipped with a flat-panel detector. Imaging parameters were set at 96 kVp and 1-8 mA, with a field of view of 230 mm × 160 mm and a voxel size of 0.4 mm. The exposure time ranged between 5.087 and 5.166 seconds, and the dose-area product was 46 mGy·cm². Images with motion artifacts, prior surgical intervention, or pathological findings affecting the nasopharyngeal region were excluded.
RF measurements included depth, orifice width, angle relative to the sagittal plane, and volume. Patient age and sex were also recorded. Linear measurements were performed on axial CBCT sections. All images were evaluated in a dimly lit room using a 15.6-inch laptop monitor (Qosmio F75-5-3D350, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) with a resolution of 1920 pixels × 1080 pixels and 32-bit color depth.
For volumetric analysis, axial CBCT datasets were exported in DICOM format and imported into third-party software, 3D Doctor (Able Software Corp., Lexington, United States), which utilizes vector-based segmentation technology. On axial images, fossa width, depth, angle, and volume were measured and recorded (Figure 1A and B).
For volumetric measurements, CBCT images were manually segmented on consecutive axial slices, and three-dimensional reconstruction was automatically generated by the software, enabling apicocoronal visualization and volumetric calculation (Figure 1C). All linear and volumetric measurements were performed using the same software by two experienced dento-maxillofacial radiology specialists at two time points, separated by a 2-week interval. A subset of 50 images was reevaluated to assess intra-observer agreement.
The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences between groups. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were calculated to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Overall descriptive statistics for RF morphology are presented in Table 1. The mean width was 4.21 ± 1.43 mm (median: 4.16; range: 1.17-11.09), and the mean depth was 12.82 ± 3.39 mm (median: 12.84; range: 4.79-25.86). The mean angle relative to the sagittal plane was 52.34° ± 9.11° (median: 51.40; range: 9.28-79.90). Volumetric analysis demonstrated a mean RF volume of 334.78 ± 329.93 mm3 (median: 210.67; range: 29.31-1632.76), indicating substantial interindividual variability (Table 1).
| Variable | n | mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
| Width (mm) | 1000 | 4.2134 | 1.43496 | 4.1615 | 1.17 | 11.09 |
| Depth (mm) | 1000 | 12.8159 | 3.39217 | 12.8350 | 4.79 | 25.86 |
| Angle (°) | 1000 | 52.3415 | 9.11407 | 51.3950 | 9.28 | 79.90 |
| Volume (mm³) | 1000 | 334.7796 | 329.92826 | 210.6730 | 29.31 | 1632.76 |
A total of 500 Turkish patients (18-60 years) were included in the study. The mean age was 31.62 ± 9.50 years, as summarized in Table 2. Bilateral RF measurements were performed, yielding 1000 sides for morphometric evaluation.
| Variable | N | Minimum | Maximum | mean | SD |
| Age (years) | 500 | 18.00 | 60.00 | 31.6207 | 9.50314 |
Gender-based comparisons are provided in Table 3. The female group comprised 315 patients (630 sides), and the male group comprised 185 patients (370 sides). No statistically significant sex-related differences were identified in width (female: 4.20 ± 1.46 mm; male: 4.24 ± 1.41 mm; P = 0.885), depth (female: 12.82 ± 3.39 mm; male: 12.80 ± 3.44 mm; P = 0.973), or angle (female: 51.66° ± 9.75°; male: 53.52° ± 7.88°; P = 0.296). Similarly, volumetric measurements did not differ significantly between females and males (307.26 ± 304.78 mm3 vs 383.26 ± 368.99 mm3, respectively; P = 0.336), as shown in Table 3.
| Parameter | Female (n = 630) | Male (n = 370) | P value |
| Width (mm) | 4.1988 ± 1.45850 | 4.2392 ± 1.40960 | 0.885 |
| Depth (mm) | 12.8239 ± 3.39043 | 12.8018 ± 3.43630 | 0.973 |
| Angle (°) | 51.6567 ± 9.75115 | 53.5153 ± 7.87686 | 0.296 |
| Volume (mm³) | 307.2620 ± 304.78089 | 383.2630 ± 368.98751 | 0.336 |
Collectively, these findings establish normative CBCT-based linear and volumetric reference values for the RF within the studied population and suggest that the evaluated morphometric parameters are not significantly influenced by sex (Tables 1-3).
Table 4 presents ICC values for intra- and inter-observer agreement for width, depth, angle, and volume mea
| Parameter | ICC | P value | 95% confidence interval |
| Intraobserver observer 1/observer 2 | |||
| Width | 0.971/0.965 | < 0.001 | 0.941-0.939 |
| 0.974-0.972 | |||
| Depth | 0.973/0.954 | < 0.001 | 0.967-0.965 |
| 0.995-0.996 | |||
| Angle | 0.965/0.961 | < 0.001 | 0.951-0.964; 0.997-0.995 |
| Volume | 0.952/0.955 | 0.941-0.939; 0.991-0.989 | |
| Interobserver observer 1-2 | |||
| Width | 0.918 | < 0.001 | 0.901-0.943 |
| Depth | 0.912 | < 0.001 | 0.898-0.931 |
| Angle | 0.909 | < 0.001 | 0.901-0.913 |
| Volume | 0.908 | < 0.001 | 0.889-0.911 |
The RF is a complex anatomical recess of the nasopharynx and represents the most frequent site of origin of NPC. Despite its well-established clinical relevance, quantitative three-dimensional morphometric data on this region remain limited. In the present study, CBCT images of the RF were evaluated using linear, angular, and volumetric measurements, enabling comprehensive anatomical characterization. The excellent ICC values obtained indicate high intra- and inter-observer repeatability. Within the limitations of this study, these findings support the use of CBCT for RF assessment.
A previous CBCT study of posterior nasopharyngeal wall structures in a Turkish cohort reported lower mean RF depth values and identified statistically significant sex differences in RF width, along with an age-related increase in RF-posterior nasal spine distance[4]. In contrast, our analysis did not demonstrate significant sex differences in width, depth, angle, or volume. These discrepancies may reflect methodological heterogeneity, including differences in CBCT acquisition parameters (e.g., device and voxel size and, importantly, measurement definitions (purely linear axial metrics vs segmentation-based 3D assessment). Future studies that standardize RF boundary definitions and integrate skeletal reference distances with volumetric segmentation would improve cross-study comparability.
Previous investigations of the RF have primarily relied on linear morphometric measurements obtained from computed tomography (CT) or CBCT imaging. Kaplan et al[5] analyzed posterior nasopharyngeal wall structures using CBCT and demonstrated significant anatomical variability in recess depth and width. Similarly, Serindere et al[6] reported morphometric distances and anatomical relationships of the RF in a large CBCT cohort, emphasizing the clinical importance of this region. However, neither study incorporated volumetric or surface area analysis.
The present study expands upon these findings by integrating three-dimensional volumetric evaluation, providing a more realistic representation of this irregular anatomical cavity.
Linear morphometric measurements alone may not adequately reflect the true anatomical characteristics of irregular cavities such as the RF. Grauer et al[7] emphasized that volumetric airway analysis provides superior anatomical accuracy compared with two-dimensional measurements, particularly for complex three-dimensional structures. Our findings support this concept, as volumetric measurements revealed substantial interindividual variability that could not be fully captured by linear parameters alone.
Volumetric measurements in our population showed a wide range, reflecting notable anatomical heterogeneity. This variability underscores the need to establish population-specific normative reference values; without such data, distinguishing physiological variation from early pathological change becomes challenging. This is particularly important for the RF, as NPC often arises submucosally within this recess and may not produce obvious early radiologic contour changes[8,9].
No statistically significant sex-related differences were observed in our study. This contrasts with previous CBCT-based airway and nasopharyngeal studies reporting larger airway and recess dimensions in males[9,10]. Sexual dimorphism in craniofacial skeletal morphology, hormonal influences on growth patterns, and differences in muscular and connective tissue development may contribute to these variations. These findings suggest that RF assessment should consider sex-specific reference values to avoid misinterpretation.
Early detection of NPC remains a diagnostic challenge. King et al[8] demonstrated that early NPC often originates in the pharyngeal recess and may be overlooked without careful radiologic assessment. Quantitative morphometric evaluation may therefore enhance early diagnostic sensitivity by enabling detection of subtle asymmetry, focal volumetric expansion, or architectural distortion. The volumetric reference values established in this study may assist radiologists in identifying suspicious deviations from normal anatomy.
CBCT offers several advantages for morphometric evaluation of the nasopharyngeal region. Compared with conventional CT, CBCT provides isotropic voxel geometry, high spatial resolution, and reduced radiation dose, facilitating accurate three-dimensional reconstruction of complex anatomical structures[10,11].
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), following endoscopic evaluation, is the preferred modality due to its higher sensitivity for detecting invasion, lymphadenopathy, submucosal bulging, and adenoid enlargement. It has been suggested that asymptomatic individuals with positive MRI findings but negative endoscopic examination should undergo nasopharyngeal biopsy or close MRI surveillance. Imaging also helps guide the site and depth of biopsy. In contrast, CT provides superior evaluation of bony destruction[12].
The present study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. It is a single-center study with a sample limited to the Turkish population. The relatively limited soft-tissue contrast of CBCT may hinder visualization of mucosal detail or early infiltration. Additional limitations include the subjectivity of semi-automated manual segmentation and the absence of validation against a gold standard (e.g., cadaveric dissection or intraoperative measurements).
Although CBCT has lower soft-tissue contrast than MRI, its geometric accuracy makes it particularly well suited for anatomical morphometry. Therefore, CBCT should be considered a complementary modality to MRI in the assessment of nasopharyngeal anatomy.
The findings of this study also have implications for surgical and endoscopic procedures involving the nasopharynx. Accurate knowledge of RF morphology is essential for safe biopsy sampling, endoscopic navigation, and avoidance of adjacent vital structures, such as the internal carotid artery. Three-dimensional morphometric data may therefore contribute to improved procedural planning and reduced complication risk. CBCT imaging may provide valuable anatomical information for the evaluation of RF.
| 1. | Loh LE, Chee TS, John AB. The anatomy of the Fossa of Rosenmuller--its possible influence on the detection of occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Singapore Med J. 1991;32:154-155. [PubMed] |
| 2. | Jones TM, Evans M. Oropharyngeal Tumours. 8th ed. In: Watkinson J, Clarke R, editors. Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018: 29. |
| 3. | Sutthiprapaporn P, Tanimoto K, Ohtsuka M, Nagasaki T, Konishi M, Iida Y, Katsumata A. Improved inspection of the lateral pharyngeal recess using cone-beam computed tomography in the upright position. Oral Radiol. 2008;24:71-75. [RCA] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in RCA: 13] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Özeren Keşkek C. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Posterior Wall of the Nasopharynx in Turkish Population. Med Rec. 2023;5:110-115. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 5. | Kaplan FA, Saglam H, Bilgir E, Bayrakdar IS, Orhan K. Radıologıcal Evaluatıon of the Recesses on the Posterıor Wall of the Nasopharynx wıth Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25:55-61. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Serindere G, Gunduz K, Avsever H, Orhan K. The anatomical and measurement study of rosenmüller fossa and oropharyngeal structures using cone beam computed tomography. Acta Clin Croat. 2022;61:177-184. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Styner MA, Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Pharyngeal airway volume and shape from cone-beam computed tomography: relationship to facial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:805-814. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 162] [Cited by in RCA: 178] [Article Influence: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | King AD, Vlantis AC, Tsang RK, Gary TM, Au AK, Chan CY, Kok SY, Kwok WT, Lui HK, Ahuja AT. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1288-1291. [PubMed] |
| 9. | Chong VF, Fan YF. Skull base erosion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: detection by CT and MRI. Clin Radiol. 1996;51:625-631. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 77] [Cited by in RCA: 73] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75-80. [PubMed] |
| 11. | Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1088-1095. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 295] [Cited by in RCA: 218] [Article Influence: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | King AD, Woo JKS, Ai QY, Chan JSM, Lam WKJ, Tse IOL, Bhatia KS, Zee BCY, Hui EP, Ma BBY, Chiu RWK, van Hasselt AC, Chan ATC, Lo YMD, Chan KCA. Complementary roles of MRI and endoscopic examination in the early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:977-982. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in RCA: 65] [Article Influence: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |