BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2026; 18(3): 118119
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.118119
Table 1 Distribution of fixation device types
Fixation type
n
%
DHS627.3
External fixation313.6
Medullary nail522.7
Plate and screws627.3
Screws14.5
THR14.5
Table 2 Vascular pathology in study population
Pathology
n
%
Atherosclerosis940.9
Normal1045.5
Tumor compression313.6
Table 3 Location and laterality of prostheses
Parameter
n
%
Location
    Femur1777.3
    Tibia522.7
Side
    Right1150
    Left1150
Table 4 Signal-to-noise ratio with and without metal artifact reduction, median (25th percentile, 75th percentile)
Observer
With MAR
Without MAR
Reference
P value
One17.3 (8.5-30.2)8.03 (1.99-26)17.6 (6.65-42.5)0.057
Two12.98 (7.68-41.8)5.74 (2.88-23.6)a19.1 (8.2-36.5)0.009
Three16.5 (5.5-40.6)6.5 (3.0-15.8)a16.8 (7.1-43.0)0.004
Table 5 Intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-observer agreement
Measurement
ICC
Absolute agreement
95%CI for ICC
P value
SNR
    With MAR0.751Good0.570-0.877< 0.001
    Without MAR0.460Poor0.205-0.697< 0.001
    Reference0.790Good0.628-0.898< 0.001
CNR
    With MAR0.764Good0.488-0.809< 0.001
    Without MAR0.487Poor0.230-0.717< 0.001
    Reference0.810Good0.684-0.916< 0.001
Table 6 Overall artifact burden and image quality with vs without metal artifact reduction, median (minimum-maximum)
Characteristic
With MARS
Without MARS
MD1 (95%CI)
P value
Overall artifact2 (2-5)4 (3-5)1.5 (1-2)< 0.001
Overall image quality1 (1-3)2.5 (1-3)1 (0.5-1)< 0.001
Table 7 Inter-observer agreement of subjective assessment
Image type
Study quality assessment (W)
Study quality (P value)
Artifact assessment (W)
P value
MAR-reconstructed0.899< 0.0010.918< 0.001
Non-MAR0.847< 0.0010.922< 0.001