Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2025; 17(9): 111215
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111215
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111215
Table 1 The basic information of the patients and the comparison in patients with endometrial peristalsis, no endometrial peristalsis and endometrial peristalsis analysis done unsuccessfully
Case numbers | Age (year) | History of induced abortion | Menstrual cycle | Uterine position | Uterine longitudinal diameter (mm) | Endometrial thickness (mm) | Endometrial grade | ||||||||
0 | 1 | ≥ 2 | Proliferate phase | Secretory phase | Menopause | Anterior | Posterior | A | B | C | |||||
EmPA done unsuccessfully | 9 | 35.67 ± 4.69 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 58.22 ± 4.09 | 9.41 ± 1.80 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
With EmP shown on EmPA | 115 | 33.70 ± 7.78 | 54 | 35 | 26 | 68 | 44 | 3 | 70 | 45 | 52.43 ± 7.08 | 6.53 ± 2.52 | 52 | 39 | 24 |
No EmP shown on EmPA | 21 | 39.71 ± 13.95 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 9 | 43.38 ± 9.37 | 4.72 ± 2.87 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
t/χ² | 2.822 | 29.201 | 39.629 | 2.946 | 5.103 | 2.957 | 27.117 | ||||||||
P value | 0.006 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.244 | < 0.001 | 0.004 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 The comparison of endometrial peristalsis results in 50 patients by both endometrial peristalsis analysis and naked eyes analysis
EmPA (n = 50) | ||||
No EmP (9) | With EmP (38) | EmPA done unsuccessfully (3) | ||
Naked eyes analysis of a senior radiologist (n = 50) | No EmP (8) | 4 | 3 | 1 |
With EmP (42) | 5 | 35 | 2 | |
χ2 | 7.569 | |||
P value | 0.016 |
Table 3 Average parameters of endometrial peristalsis analysis and their relations with clinical and ultrasound parameters
Transfer direction | Peristalsis intensity | Transfer time (sec) | Transfer distance (mm) | Transfer velocity (mm/second) | Peristalsis frequency (/minute) | ||||
CF | FC | OP | |||||||
Menstrual cycle | Proliferate phase (n = 68) | 37 | 24 | 7 | 21.842 ± 8.154 | 6.444 ± 4.067 | 13.474 ± 9.033 | 2.494 ± 1.120 | 2.125 ± 0.975 |
Secretory phase (n = 44) | 30 | 9 | 5 | 26.308 ± 9.866 | 5.804 ± 3.662 | 12.529 ± 6.054 | 2.743 ± 1.205 | 2.330 ± 1.120 | |
t/χ² | 2.896 | 2.621 | 0.845 | 0.610 | 1.113 | 1.022 | |||
P value | 0.256 | 0.010 | 0.400 | 0.543 | 0.268 | 0.309 | |||
Uterine position | Anteverted (70) | 43 | 21 | 6 | 25.280 ± 8.769 | 6.165 ± 3.974 | 11.567 ± 6.124 | 2.404 ± 1.007 | 2.164 ± 0.984 |
Retroverted (45) | 26 | 13 | 6 | 20.574 ± 8.786 | 6.080 ± 3.790 | 15.263 ± 9.737 | 2.903 ± 1.298 | 2.244 ± 1.161 | |
t/χ² | 0.740 | 2.807 | 0.115 | 2.501 | 2.311 | 0.397 | |||
P value | 0.718 | 0.006 | 0.909 | 0.014 | 0.023 | 0.692 | |||
History of induced abortion | 0 (54) | 30 | 18 | 6 | 23.709 ± 8.808 | 6.234 ± 3.621 | 13.606 ± 8.665 | 2.644 ± 1.202 | 2.472 ± 1.066 |
1 (35) | 22 | 9 | 4 | 26.130 ± 7.802 | 5.716 ± 3.598 | 11.689 ± 6.646 | 2.480 ± 1.060 | 2.057 ± 0.914 | |
≥ 2 (26) | 17 | 7 | 2 | 19.255 ± 9.828a | 6.480 ± 4.803 | 13.564 ± 7.910 | 2.667 ± 1.192 | 1.808 ± 1.078b | |
F/χ² | 1.093 | 4.642 | 0.320 | 0.702 | 0.269 | 4.149 | |||
P value | 0.915 | 0.012 | 0.727 | 0.498 | 0.765 | 0.018 | |||
Endometrial grade | A (52) | 34 | 12 | 6 | 23.998 ± 9.132 | 6.150 ± 3.767 | 11.886 ± 5.656 | 2.428 ± 0.988 | 2.327 ± 0.949 |
B (39) | 21 | 15 | 3 | 24.173 ± 9.137 | 6.411 ± 3.907 | 15.030 ± 10.745 | 2.754 ± 1.206 | 2.359 ± 1.063 | |
C (24) | 14 | 7 | 3 | 21.035 ± 8.615 | 5.637 ± 4.219 | 12.178 ± 6.162 | 2.719 ± 1.370 | 1.646 ± 1.107c | |
F/χ² | 2.832 | 1.079 | 0.292 | 1.961 | 0.057 | 4.394 | |||
P value | 0.595 | 0.343 | 0.747 | 0.146 | 0.351 | 0.015 | |||
Age | ≤ 35 year (80) | 50 | 20 | 10 | 23.364 ± 9.387 | 5.734 ± 3.353 | 1.249 ± 0.795 | 2.583 ± 1.130 | 2.250 ± 1.049 |
> 35 year (35) | 19 | 14 | 2 | 23.611 ± 8.305 | 7.041 ± 4.826 | 1.422 ± 0.779 | 2.637 ± 1.215 | 2.071 ± 1.065 | |
t/χ² | 2.996 | 0.134 | 1.455 | 1.079 | 0.233 | 0.836 | |||
P value | 0.221 | 0.893 | 0.152 | 0.283 | 0.816 | 0.405 | |||
Age | r | / | 0.068 | 0.079 | 0.043 | 0.008 | 0.136 | ||
P value | / | 0.471 | 0.400 | 0.652 | 0.932 | 0.146 | |||
Uterine longitudinal diameter | r | / | 0.042 | 0.036 | 0.096 | 0.100 | 0.216 | ||
P value | / | 0.659 | 0.703 | 0.309 | 0.286 | 0.020 | |||
Uterine endometrial thickness | r | / | 0.316 | 0.069 | 0.084 | 0.107 | 0.293 | ||
P value | / | 0.001 | 0.436 | 0.370 | 0.254 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Highest parameters of endometrial peristalsis analysis and their relations with clinical and ultrasound parameters
Transfer direction | Peristalsis intensity | Transfer time (second) | Transfer distance (mm) | Transfer velocity (mm/second) | |||
CF | FC | ||||||
Menstrual cycle | Proliferate phase | 39 | 28 | 25.857 ± 10.307 | 6.255 ± 4.722 | 12.478 ± 7.429 | 2.643 ± 1.790 |
Secretory phase | 30 | 13 | 32.180 ± 12.162 | 5.793 ± 3.914 | 13.177 ± 6.899 | 3.113 ± 2.213 | |
t/χ² | 1.497 | 2.953 | 0.539 | 0.500 | 1.235 | ||
P value | 0.234 | 0.004 | 0.591 | 0.618 | 0.219 | ||
Uterine position | Anteverted (70) | 43 | 27 | 30.151 ± 11.023 | 6.074 ± 4.363 | 11.447 ± 6.888 | 2.427 ± 1.516 |
Retroverted (45) | 29 | 14 | 25.043 ± 11.679 | 5.868 ± 4.450 | 14.513 ± 7.210 | 3.462 ± 2.365 | |
t/χ² | 0.417 | 2.369 | 0.246 | 2.288 | 2.610 | ||
P value | 0.552 | 0.020 | 0.806 | 0.024 | 0.011 | ||
History of induced abortion | 0 (54) | 32 | 20 | 28.978 ± 11.596 | 5.816 ± 4.038 | 12.441 ± 6.344 | 2.898 ± 2.111 |
1 (35) | 23 | 12 | 31.406 ± 9.595 | 5.755 ± 3.586 | 11.866 ± 6.780 | 2.711 ± 1.909 | |
≥ 2 (26) | 17 | 18 | 22.058 ± 11.783a | 6.684 ± 5.894 | 14.127 ± 9.038 | 2.857 ± 1.712 | |
F/χ² | 2.365 | 5.601 | 0.416 | 0.787 | 0.099 | ||
P value | 0.321 | 0.005 | 0.661 | 0.458 | 0.906 | ||
Endometrial grade | A (52) | 34 | 18 | 28.768 ± 11.190 | 6.217 ± 4.455 | 11.746 ± 6.254 | 2.349 ± 1.266 |
B (39) | 21 | 18 | 29.634 ± 11.939 | 6.195 ± 4.555 | 13.654 ± 8.558 | 2.952 ± 2.058 | |
C (24) | 17 | 5 | 24.407 ± 11.144 | 5.181 ± 3.984 | 12.963 ± 6.447 | 3.683 ± 2.648b | |
F/χ² | 3.455 | 1.690 | 0.518 | 0.822 | 4.171 | ||
P value | 0.185 | 0.189 | 0.597 | 0.442 | 0.018 | ||
Age, year | ≤ 35 (80) | 52 | 27 | 28.323 ± 11.848 | 5.613 ± 3.752 | 11.800 ± 6.092 | 2.778 ± 1.974 |
> 35 (35) | 20 | 14 | 27.761 ± 10.851 | 6.862 ± 5.519 | 14.583 ± 8.908 | 2.954 ± 1.920 | |
t/χ² | 0.504 | 0.240 | 1.221 | 1.684 | 0.442 | ||
P value | 0.526 | 0.811 | 0.228 | 0.099 | 0.659 | ||
Age | r | / | 0.139 | 0.056 | 0.063 | 0.066 | |
P value | / | 0.139 | 0.552 | 0.500 | 0.483 | ||
Uterine longitudinal diameter | r | / | 0.069 | 0.044 | 0.080 | 0.170 | |
P value | / | 0.462 | 0.644 | 0.393 | 0.069 | ||
Uterine endometrial thickness | r | / | 0.317 | 0.083 | 0.152 | 0.035 | |
P value | / | 0.001 | 0.376 | 0.104 | 0.710 |
- Citation: Zhang HP, Chen ML, Xue SL, Zou J, Wu JJ, Zhou YQ. Value of endometrial peristalsis analysis technique in detecting and analyzing endometrial peristalsis features. World J Radiol 2025; 17(9): 111215
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i9/111215.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111215