Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2025; 17(7): 107459
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i7.107459
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i7.107459
Table 1 Key differences between imaging modalities
FD | MRD | PFUS | EDF | |
Oral contrast | Needed for small bowel evaluation | Not needed | Not needed | Not needed |
Ionizing radiation exposure | Yes | No | No | No |
Position | Sitting on the commode | Mainly supine | Lithotomy | Left lateral |
Multiplanar assessment | Limited | Excellent | Good | Good |
Multicompartment diagnosis | Yes (limited) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Soft tissue assessment | No | Excellent | Good | Good |
Cost | Relatively less expensive | More expensive | Low | Low |
- Citation: Singh JP, Assaie-Ardakany S, Aleissa MA, Al-Shaer K, Chitragari G, Drelichman ER, Mittal VK, Bhullar JS. Optimizing diagnosis in obstructed defecation syndrome: A review of imaging modalities. World J Radiol 2025; 17(7): 107459
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i7/107459.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i7.107459