Elmokadem AH, Elged BA, Abdel Razek A, El-Serougy LG, Kasem MA, EL-Adalany MA. Interobserver reliability of computed tomography angiography in the assessment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm and impact on patient management. World J Radiol 2023; 15(6): 201-215 [PMID: 37424734 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ali H Elmokadem, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Mansoura University, Elgomhoria St, Mansoura 35516, Egypt. mokademr83@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2023; 15(6): 201-215 Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Table 1 Imaging features considered in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
Endovascular therapy
Surgical management
Non-contrast computed tomography
Absence of parenchymal hematoma
Presence of intra-parenchymal hematoma
Aneurysm characters
Posterior circulation aneurysms
Middle cerebral and pericallosal arteries aneurysm
Small aneurysm neck < 4 mm
Aneurysm diameter > 15 mm Wide neck aneurysm > 4 mm
Aneurysm diameter < 15 mm
Abnormal configuration
Unilobar configuration
Aneurysmal sac incorporating arterial branches
Multiple aneurysms
Presence of intraluminal thrombus
Calcification located at the aneurysm neck
Perianeurysmal findings
Presence of vasospasm
Vascular variants interfere with endovascular management
Table 2 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography and computed tomography angiography features of aneurysm
Signs
Reader 1
Reader 2
K
95% CI
P value
Agreement, %
NCCT findings
SAH Fisher scale
3.47 ± 0.6
3.33 ± 0.4
0.84
0.78-0.85
< 0.001
89.50
Hydrocephalus (HCP)
Negative (N)
93
95
0.91
0.85-0.97
< 0.001
95.90
Positive (p)
53
51
Intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH)
Negative (N)
105
105
1
1.0-1.0
< 0.001
100.00
Positive (p)
41
41
Aneurysm features
Number
Total
166
169
0.95
0.89-1.0
< 0.001
98.80
Single
126
127
Multiple
40
42
Size
Small
55
57
0.89
0.83-0.96
< 0.001
94.70
Medium
101
102
Large
5
5
Giant
5
5
Site
Anterior
156
157
0.94
0.83-1.0
< 0.001
99.40
Posterior
10
12
Shape
Saccular
160
162
0.92
0.76-1.0
< 0.001
99.40
Fusiform
4
4
Serpentine
2
2
Blister
0
1
Margin
Sharp
71
75
0.95
0.90-0.99
< 0.001
97.60
Lobulated
95
94
Thrombus
6
9
0.82
0.65-0.99
< 0.001
97.60
Calcification
9
9
1
1.0-1.0
< 0.001
100.00
Branch incorporation
50
55
0.9
0.83-0.97
< 0.001
95.90
Orientation
0.95
0.91-0.97
< 0.001
96.50
Perianeurysmal findings
Vasospasm
21
25
0.9
0.81-0.99
< 0.001
97.60
Perianeurysmal cyst
1
1
1
1.0-1.0
< 0.001
100.0
Other vascular lesions
2
4
0.82
0.59-1.0
< 0.001
98.80
Bony relations
23
26
0.88
0.78-0.98
< 0.001
97.00
Bone fracture
1
1
Vascular variant
84
88
0.89
0.83-0.96
< 0.001
94.90
Overall agreement
0.95
0.94-0.96
< 0.001
97.80
Table 3 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography locations of aneurysm
Parent artery
Reader 1
Reader 2
ACOM
73
73
ACA
5
6
RT ICA
20
20
LT ICA
16
16
RT MCA
21
22
LT MCA
20
20
Basilar
8
9
LT PCA
1
1
RT Vertebral
1
1
LT SCA
0
1
K
95%CI
P value
0.97
0.87-1.0
< 0.001
Arterial segment
Reader 1
Reader 2
ACOM- Lt ACA complex
36
36
ACOM- Rt ACA complex
34
34
ACOM proper
3
3
A1
1
1
RT A2
1
1
LT A2
0
1
Azygous A2
2
2
A3
1
1
RT MCA bifurcation
14
14
LT MCA bifurcation
15
15
RT M1
4
4
LT M1
3
3
RT M2
3
3
LT M2
2
2
M4
0
1
RT PCOM
12
12
LT PCOM
9
9
RT ICA Terminus
4
4
LT ICA Terminus
2
2
RT Cavernous ICA
4
4
LT Cavernous ICA
5
5
Basilar tip
4
4
Mid Basilar
2
3
Basilar Perforators
2
2
Rt V4
1
1
LT SCA
0
1
Lt P1
1
1
K
95%CI
P value
0.97
0.87-1.0
< 0.001
Table 4 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography measurements of aneurysm
Size
Dome
Neck
Dome/neck ratio
Reader 1
Reader 2
Reader 1
Reader 2
Reader 1
Reader 2
Reader 1
Reader 2
Mean
7.4
7.4
3.7
3.6
2.7
2.7
1.3
1.3
Median
6
6
3
3
2.3
2.3
1.2
1.2
SD
5.44
5.47
3.2
3.1
2.1
2.1
0.8
0.8
Minimum
1.8
1.8
1
1
1
1
0.2
0.2
Maximum
40
42
22
22
20
20
4.7
5.6
ICC
0.97
0.97
0.96
0.98
95%CI
(0.96-0.98)
(0.96-0.97)
(0.95-0.97)
(0.97-0.98)
Citation: Elmokadem AH, Elged BA, Abdel Razek A, El-Serougy LG, Kasem MA, EL-Adalany MA. Interobserver reliability of computed tomography angiography in the assessment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm and impact on patient management. World J Radiol 2023; 15(6): 201-215