Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2023; 15(6): 201-215
Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Table 1 Imaging features considered in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
| Endovascular therapy | Surgical management | |
| Non-contrast computed tomography | Absence of parenchymal hematoma | Presence of intra-parenchymal hematoma |
| Aneurysm characters | Posterior circulation aneurysms | Middle cerebral and pericallosal arteries aneurysm |
| Small aneurysm neck < 4 mm | Aneurysm diameter > 15 mm Wide neck aneurysm > 4 mm | |
| Aneurysm diameter < 15 mm | Abnormal configuration | |
| Unilobar configuration | Aneurysmal sac incorporating arterial branches | |
| Multiple aneurysms | Presence of intraluminal thrombus | |
| Calcification located at the aneurysm neck | ||
| Perianeurysmal findings | Presence of vasospasm | Vascular variants interfere with endovascular management |
Table 2 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography and computed tomography angiography features of aneurysm
| Signs | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | K | 95% CI | P value | Agreement, % | |
| NCCT findings | |||||||
| SAH Fisher scale | 3.47 ± 0.6 | 3.33 ± 0.4 | 0.84 | 0.78-0.85 | < 0.001 | 89.50 | |
| Hydrocephalus (HCP) | Negative (N) | 93 | 95 | 0.91 | 0.85-0.97 | < 0.001 | 95.90 |
| Positive (p) | 53 | 51 | |||||
| Intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH) | Negative (N) | 105 | 105 | 1 | 1.0-1.0 | < 0.001 | 100.00 |
| Positive (p) | 41 | 41 | |||||
| Aneurysm features | |||||||
| Number | Total | 166 | 169 | 0.95 | 0.89-1.0 | < 0.001 | 98.80 |
| Single | 126 | 127 | |||||
| Multiple | 40 | 42 | |||||
| Size | Small | 55 | 57 | 0.89 | 0.83-0.96 | < 0.001 | 94.70 |
| Medium | 101 | 102 | |||||
| Large | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Giant | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Site | Anterior | 156 | 157 | 0.94 | 0.83-1.0 | < 0.001 | 99.40 |
| Posterior | 10 | 12 | |||||
| Shape | Saccular | 160 | 162 | 0.92 | 0.76-1.0 | < 0.001 | 99.40 |
| Fusiform | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Serpentine | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Blister | 0 | 1 | |||||
| Margin | Sharp | 71 | 75 | 0.95 | 0.90-0.99 | < 0.001 | 97.60 |
| Lobulated | 95 | 94 | |||||
| Thrombus | 6 | 9 | 0.82 | 0.65-0.99 | < 0.001 | 97.60 | |
| Calcification | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1.0-1.0 | < 0.001 | 100.00 | |
| Branch incorporation | 50 | 55 | 0.9 | 0.83-0.97 | < 0.001 | 95.90 | |
| Orientation | 0.95 | 0.91-0.97 | < 0.001 | 96.50 | |||
| Perianeurysmal findings | |||||||
| Vasospasm | 21 | 25 | 0.9 | 0.81-0.99 | < 0.001 | 97.60 | |
| Perianeurysmal cyst | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0-1.0 | < 0.001 | 100.0 | |
| Other vascular lesions | 2 | 4 | 0.82 | 0.59-1.0 | < 0.001 | 98.80 | |
| Bony relations | 23 | 26 | 0.88 | 0.78-0.98 | < 0.001 | 97.00 | |
| Bone fracture | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Vascular variant | 84 | 88 | 0.89 | 0.83-0.96 | < 0.001 | 94.90 | |
| Overall agreement | 0.95 | 0.94-0.96 | < 0.001 | 97.80 | |||
Table 3 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography locations of aneurysm
| Parent artery | Reader 1 | Reader 2 |
| ACOM | 73 | 73 |
| ACA | 5 | 6 |
| RT ICA | 20 | 20 |
| LT ICA | 16 | 16 |
| RT MCA | 21 | 22 |
| LT MCA | 20 | 20 |
| Basilar | 8 | 9 |
| LT PCA | 1 | 1 |
| RT Vertebral | 1 | 1 |
| LT SCA | 0 | 1 |
| K | 95%CI | P value |
| 0.97 | 0.87-1.0 | < 0.001 |
| Arterial segment | Reader 1 | Reader 2 |
| ACOM- Lt ACA complex | 36 | 36 |
| ACOM- Rt ACA complex | 34 | 34 |
| ACOM proper | 3 | 3 |
| A1 | 1 | 1 |
| RT A2 | 1 | 1 |
| LT A2 | 0 | 1 |
| Azygous A2 | 2 | 2 |
| A3 | 1 | 1 |
| RT MCA bifurcation | 14 | 14 |
| LT MCA bifurcation | 15 | 15 |
| RT M1 | 4 | 4 |
| LT M1 | 3 | 3 |
| RT M2 | 3 | 3 |
| LT M2 | 2 | 2 |
| M4 | 0 | 1 |
| RT PCOM | 12 | 12 |
| LT PCOM | 9 | 9 |
| RT ICA Terminus | 4 | 4 |
| LT ICA Terminus | 2 | 2 |
| RT Cavernous ICA | 4 | 4 |
| LT Cavernous ICA | 5 | 5 |
| Basilar tip | 4 | 4 |
| Mid Basilar | 2 | 3 |
| Basilar Perforators | 2 | 2 |
| Rt V4 | 1 | 1 |
| LT SCA | 0 | 1 |
| Lt P1 | 1 | 1 |
| K | 95%CI | P value |
| 0.97 | 0.87-1.0 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography measurements of aneurysm
| Size | Dome | Neck | Dome/neck ratio | |||||
| Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |
| Mean | 7.4 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Median | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| SD | 5.44 | 5.47 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Minimum | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Maximum | 40 | 42 | 22 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 4.7 | 5.6 |
| ICC | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | ||||
| 95%CI | (0.96-0.98) | (0.96-0.97) | (0.95-0.97) | (0.97-0.98) | ||||
- Citation: Elmokadem AH, Elged BA, Abdel Razek A, El-Serougy LG, Kasem MA, EL-Adalany MA. Interobserver reliability of computed tomography angiography in the assessment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm and impact on patient management. World J Radiol 2023; 15(6): 201-215
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v15/i6/201.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
