Hagiwara S, Yang A, Takao S, Kaneko Y, Nozaki T, Yoshioka H. New scoring system in assessment of Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis: A comparative study with established scoring systems. World J Radiol 2018; 10(11): 162-171 [PMID: 30568750 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.162]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hiroshi Yoshioka, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Professor, Executive Vice Chair, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, United States. hiroshi@uci.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2018; 10(11): 162-171 Published online Nov 28, 2018. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.162
Table 1 Magnetic resonance imaging parameters for the sequences
Imaging parameter
Tesla
Sequence
Sag PD
Sag PD-FS
Sag T1CE
Ax PD-FS
Ax T1CE
Repetition time (ms)
1.5T
2000
3000
438
3400
714
3T
2054-3940
3000-4150
530-782
3000-5300
530-782
Echo time (ms)
1.5T
46
46
12
43
13
3T
22-30
30-43
12-20
13-45
12-20
Matrix resolution (mm)
1.5T
0.7 × 0.7
0.7 × 0.7
0.7 × 0.7
0.6 × 0.6
0.6 × 0.6
3T
0.3 × 3.3
0.3 × 0.3
0.3 × 0.3
0.3 × 0.3
0.3 × 0.3
Field of view (mm)
1.5T
150
150
150
150
150
3T
150
150
150
150
150
Slice thickness (mm)
1.5T
3.5
3.5
3.5
5
5
3T
2.5
2.5
2.5
3
3
Table 2 Inter and intraobserver reliability
Intra-observer
Inter-observer
A1-A2
A1-B
A1-C
B-C
Thickness
T1CE
0.74 (0.65-0.81)
0.69 (0.60-0.77)
0.67 (0.56-0.75)
0.55 (0.42-0.65)
PD
0.68 (0.58-0.76)
0.45 (0.31-0.57)
0.49 (0.35-0.61)
0.54 (0.41-0.65)
PD-FS
0.71 (0.61-0.78)
0.59 (0.48-0.69)
0.49 (0.35-0.60)
0.63 (0.52-0.72)
SM score
T1CE
0.88 (0.83-0.91)
0.67 (0.56-0.75)
0.78 (0.70-0.83)
0.56 (0.43-0.66)
PD
0.88 (0.83-0.91)
0.49 (0.35-0.60)
0.72 (0.63-0.79)
0.50 (0.36-0.61)
PD-FS
0.89 (0.85-0.92)
0.51 (0.38-0.63)
0.79 (0.71-0.84)
0.62 (0.50-0.71)
MOAKS
T1CE
0.76 (0.68-0.82)
0.64 (0.53-0.73)
0.54 (0.41-0.65)
0.49 (0.35-0.60)
Synovitis-score
T1CE
0.93 (0.91-0.95)
0.65 (0.54-0.74)
0.72 (0.62-0.79)
0.53 (0.40-0.64)
WORMS (effusion synovitis)
PD-FS
0.77 (0.70-0.83)
0.70 (0.61-0.78)
0.61 (0.50-0.71)
0.68 (0.58-0.76)
Effusion-diameter
PD-FS
0.89 (0.85-0.92)
0.77 (0.69-0.83)
0.81 (0.75-0.86)
0.68 (0.58-0.76)
Table 3 Correlation with the MOAKS score
1.5T
3T
Total
Thickness
T1CE
0.45
0.49
0.47
PD
0.32
0.49
0.44
PD-FS
0.42
0.41
0.41
SM score
T1CE
0.55
0.68
0.64
PD
0.61
0.64
0.63
PD-FS
0.64
0.74
0.71
Synovitis-score
T1CE
0.68
0.51
0.56
WORMS (effusion synovitis)
PD-FS
0.48
0.55
0.53
Effusion-diameter
PD-FS
0.58
0.48
0.51
Table 4 Correlation with the parapatellar synovitis score
1.5T
3T
Total
Thickness
T1CE
0.63
0.73
0.70
PD
0.52
0.45
0.47
PD-FS
0.44
0.51
0.49
SM score
T1CE
0.85
0.79
0.81
PD
0.42
0.76
0.66
PD-FS
0.79
0.59
0.65
MOAKS
T1CE
0.66
0.56
0.59
PD-FS
0.65
0.52
0.56
WORMS (effusion synovitis)
PD-FS
0.64
0.81
0.76
Effusion-diameter
PD-FS
0.52
0.62
0.59
Citation: Hagiwara S, Yang A, Takao S, Kaneko Y, Nozaki T, Yoshioka H. New scoring system in assessment of Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis: A comparative study with established scoring systems. World J Radiol 2018; 10(11): 162-171