Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2011; 3(11): 266-272
Published online Nov 28, 2011. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i11.266
Magnetic resonance imaging appearance and changes on intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement: A pilot study
Rivka R Colen, Pascal O Zinn, Saman Hazany, Daniel Do-Dai, Julian K Wu, Kevin Yao, Jay J Zhu
Rivka R Colen, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States
Pascal O Zinn, Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, United States
Saman Hazany, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, United States
Pascal O Zinn, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, United States
Daniel Do-Dai, Department of Neuroradiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, United States
Julian K Wu, Kevin Yao, Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, United States
Jay J Zhu, Mischer Neuroscience Associates, UT Houston and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States
Author contributions: Colen RR and Zinn PO contributed equally; Colen RR and Zinn PO analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Colen RR, Zinn PO, Wu JK and Zhu JJ designed the research; Colen RR, Zinn PO, Do-Dai D and Hazany S performed the research; Yao K and Wu JK performed the surgeries and performed data collection.
Supported by NIH grants R25 CA089017-06A2 (RRC)
Correspondence to: Rivka R Colen, MD, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States. rrcolen@partners.org
Telephone: +1-617-7325500 Fax: +1-617-5826033
Received: June 23, 2011
Revised: September 8, 2011
Accepted: September 15, 2011
Published online: November 28, 2011
Abstract

AIM: To investigate changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which occur with intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS: This retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, with a waiver of informed consent. A total of eight patients aged 29-67 years with GBM underwent Gliadel wafer placement. T2-weighted/FLAIR images and post-contrast T1-weighted images both before and after wafer placement were retrospectively reviewed in consensus to determine changes in the following parameters: appearance of the pericavitary tissue, pattern of tumor recurrence or progression and appearance of the Gliadel wafer itself.

RESULTS: Five out of the eight patients had a progressive increase in enhancement and pericavitary T2/ FLAIR hyperintensity within the first 2 mo and a subsequent decrease in these MRI findings. None of these patients had tumor recurrence within the first 6 mo. Three out of the eight patients demonstrated a progressive increase in enhancement and pericavitary T2 hyperintensity, which continued after the first 6 mo, and were subsequently diagnosed with true tumor progression. There was no increase in distant/nonlocal tumor recurrence. The Gliadel wafer appearance changed over time.

CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression is common after intracavitary Gliadel wafer placement and thus care should be taken before diagnosing tumor progression or recurrence within the first 2 mo.

Keywords: Pseudoprogression; Gliadel wafers; Glioblastoma; Local chemotherapy; Glioma